翻译fidic合同导读与解析3.5

3.5 决定(Determinations) In the project implementation process, there are many places to be decisions, including the different views of the parties to the contract. As a manager, engineers, both the unique role of the provisional referee, this is one of the contracts given to his power. How he exercise of that power? Look at the provisions of this paragraph: When the contract requires the engineer to decide certain matters, he should discuss with each party, and strive to make the two sides reached a consensus; Filling such agreement, under the contract, combined with the actual situation, and fair dealing; The engineer shall notify the parties of their own decision, and explain the reasons for such a decision; If a party to this objection to a decision, it can resolve it under clause 20[claims, disputes and arbitration], but before the final settlement, both sides should follow the instructions of engineer. We say that engineers are a special role in the project management community. The role from the traditional British engineering procurement, after fidic introduced its version of the contract. But the engineer’s position also seems to be change gradually. In the 3rd edition of the fidic red book (1977), the engineer is also clear that an independent party; word to the 4th edition(1987), an independent “independent” was gone, but still separate out the provisions of a provision of the master of engineering acts unbiased(impartial). To the 1999 version, and maybe we have discovered, engineers has become one of the owners side can be seen(from where?), and delete that terms of the engineers behaviors unbiased in the 4th edition, is only mentioned in this subsection, engineers should be in determining the fair(fair).therefore ,we can draw the conclusions of the special role of the “engineer”,more and more closer to the owners, and gradually lost its independence. Replaced by some of the features of its “quasi-arbitrator” another role of the engineering “Dispute Adjudication Board(DAB)”, seen section 20[Claims, Disputes and Arbitrations ] How to understand the engineers in the decision should be fair and this “soft” binding? We believe that if the engineer’s behavior is considered to be fair, his decision shall meet the following conditions: 1.c omply with the provisions and spirit of the contract 2.t aking into account the actual situation occurring 3.l isten to both sides, rather than listen to the views of the owners party 3.5 在工程的实施过程中,有许多地方都要进行决定,包括 合同 劳动合同范本免费下载装修合同范本免费下载租赁合同免费下载房屋买卖合同下载劳务合同范本下载 双方对某一问题的不同看法。作为一个管理者,工程师还兼有“临时 裁判”的特殊角色,这是合同赋予给他的权力之一。那么他怎么行使这一权力呢?看本款的 规定 关于下班后关闭电源的规定党章中关于入党时间的规定公务员考核规定下载规定办法文件下载宁波关于闷顶的规定 : 当合同中要求工程师根据本款决定某事宜时,他应与每方商量,力争使双方达成一致意见; 若达不成一致意见,他应根据合同,结合实际情况,公平处理; 工程师应将自己的决定通知双方,并 说明 关于失联党员情况说明岗位说明总经理岗位说明书会计岗位说明书行政主管岗位说明书 如此决定的理由; 如果一方对此决定有异议,可按第20条[索赔,争端与仲裁]来解决,但在最终解决之前,双方应遵照执行工程师的指令。我们说,在工程管理界,工程师还是一个特殊角色。这一角色来自于英国传统的工程采购方式,后被FIDIC引入其合同版本。但工程师的地位似乎也在逐渐变化。在FIDIC红皮书第3版(1977),工程师还被明确标明是独立的一方;到了第4版(1987),独立“independent”一词就不见了,但仍单独拿出一个条款来规定“工程师应行为无偏(impartial)。”到了这99年新版,也许大家 已经发现,工程师已经成为了业主方的一员(从哪里可以看出?),并且删除了第4版中的关于工程师应行为无偏的那一条款,只是在本款提到,工程师在决定时应公平(fair)。因此,我们可以看出得出的结论是,“工程师”这一特殊角色,越来越向业主靠拢,逐渐失去其独立性。其“准仲裁员”的部分功能也被新出现的另一角色“争端裁决委员会”(DAB)所取代,见第20条[索赔,争端与仲裁]。 怎样理解“工程师在做出决定时应当公平”这种“软”约束力呢?我们认为,如果工程师的行为被认为是公平的,他的决定应符合下列条件: 1.符合合同的规定和精神; 2.考虑到发生的实际情况; 3.倾听双方的意见,而不是一味听从业 主一方的意见。