3xxx2013-3-19Thefilmreviewof“scrapping”ThismovieisaboutastorywhichhappenedinanimmigrantfamilylivingintheUnitedStatesnow.Dennis,aChinesechild,ishavingafeverandsufferingfromdiarrhea.SincehisgrandfatherwasfromBeijinganddidn'tunderstandthedrugs'Englishinstruction,heusedthelonghistoryChinesewisdomtherapyscrappingtotreatDennis.ButheneverpredictedthatthistreatmentbecametheevidenceofDenni'sfatherabusedthechild.Inthecourt,aseriesofconflictsisfollowed,andthesohappyfamilybecamefragmentedinafewtime.Wecan'timaginescrappingisjustalittlethingforChinese.WhyshoulditbecomealegalsetbacksintheUnitedStates.Scrappinghasexperiencedthousandsofyear'shistory.WhybecameillegalbehaviorintheUS.Thisquestionisveryvaluableforpeopletothinkaboutit.AsfarasI'mconcerned,thisproblemisduetotheculturaldifferencesbetweenChineseandwesterncountry.WesternpeoplecannotbelievethetreatmentofGuashawhichhasalonghistoryinChina.Theculturedifferencesexistedineverywhere.Differentcountryhasdifferentcultures.Weshouldrealizeit,andacceptitsometime.Butthereisalsoamoreimportantreasonthatthecourtdidn'tunderstandthetruethingsanddidn'tverifytheillegalevidence.Becausetheculturaldifferenceitselfisanobjectivefactor.Onlywhenculturaldifferencescan'tbeacceptedthistragedywouldhappen.Asweallknowthelowisjustice,andthecourtneedsthefact.Inthisfilm,scrappinghadn'treallybeunderstood,thecourtdeprivedthecustodyofXuDatong.It'snodoubtthattheydidn'tunderstandcorrectlyandverifytheillegalevidence,whichleadtothecontrarytothejusticeoflaw.IfthecourtknowsthedifferencesbetweenChineseandforeigncultures,itwon'tmakesucharidiculousdecision.Anotherbrightspotofthisfilmisthefather'slove.AtthehearingXuDatongexpressedimpatiencethattotallydifferentfromhispersonalityasanengineer.Hefeelsanxietyandfearthatheisgoingtolosehischild.HespiritedawayDennisatthecontactofthelaw.InordernottoletDennisknowthetruth,heplayedagamewithDennisandDennishadagoodsleep.Intheend,Xuclimbninefloorstomakehisloveclimax.“Scrapping”isvaluableforpeopletowatch.It'srichinculturalconnotations.OfcoursethingshavebeensolvedsatisfactorilyFinally,theprosecutionofthecourthasbeenrevoked.Theresultofthefilminadditiontothenormalconscienceandmoreisduetothecommunicationandunderstandingofeachother.Ithinktheher'osnameis“DaTong”.Itstruemeaningisthecommunicationandunderstandingofotherculture.观后感一GuaShaisamovieaboutthedifferencesbetweenAmericanandChineseculture.XudatongisavideogamesdesignerinSt.Louis.WhenhisfathervisitsfromChina,heperformsGuaSha(aChinesetraditionaltreatment)onhisgrandson,whichleavesbrightredmarksontheskinandcausesalawsuitofchildabuse.Inthecourt,Datongloseshismindsothatfinallyhelosescustodyofhisson.Ithinkthissceneisshockingandthought-provokingtomostoftheChineseaudiences.Butthemostimpressingscenetomeistheending.DatongwantstoseehissoninChristmaseve,hehastoclimbapipetotheninthfloorwhichhissonlives.Ithinkthepipeisnotonlyapipe,butalsoagap,adeepgapbetweenAmericanand5000-yearChineseculture.Hewantstoclimboverthegapandhewillneversucceed,perhapsnoChinesepeoplereallycouldsucceed.中文翻译:刮痧是一部反映中美文化差异的电影。徐大同(孩子的爸爸)是圣路易斯的一位电子游戏
设计
领导形象设计圆作业设计ao工艺污水处理厂设计附属工程施工组织设计清扫机器人结构设计
师。他父亲从中国到美国看望孙子,并对孙子进行了刮痧(一种中国传统治疗的方法),哪些留在孙子皮肤上的刮痕被认为是虐待儿童的证据,并将大同告上了法庭。在法院上,由于大同没有证据(或无所是从),以至于他最后丢失对儿子的监护权。我觉得这一幕是令人震惊的,令中国观众发人深省的,但结局给人的印象最深。大同希望在圣诞节前夕看到他的儿子,他不得不爬钢管到九楼去看他的儿子。我想那钢管,不仅是钢管,而是美国与5000年中华文化的鸿沟。他想爬过这个鸿沟,他是做不到,也许没有中国人民真正能做得到IhaveneverimaginedthatIwouldwriteafilmreviewinEnglish.Becausewhenreferringtofeelingandculture,IcanhardlyexpressmywholeideainChinese,letaloneinEnglish.Well,justhaveatry.TheGuaShaTreatmentisdesignedtodiscusstheculturedifferences.WecanknowthatfromDatong,thenameoftheleadingman.DatongisaclassicalChineseterm.Itreferstoautopianvisionoftheworldinwhicheveryoneandeverythingisatpeace.Whilelifealwaysplaysjokesonpeople,Datong'speacefullifedidn'tlastlong.HewasaccusedofabusinghissonbecauseofthebruisesfromGuaSha.Actually,DatongwasnotthepersonwhogavethelittleboyGuaShatreatment.It'shisfather.ButDatongdecidedtobeascapegoat.Thiswasaculturedifference.InChinesetraditionalculture,lawisnotimportantthanaffection.Thoughwealsopraisethosepeoplewhoputrighteousnessabovefamilyloyalty,nobodywantsthathappentothemselves.Chinesethinkthatbeingascapegoatforfamilymembersespeciallyforfatherormotherisaresponsibility.ThebiggestculturedifferencethefilmshoweduswasthatChineseculturewasbasedonexperiencewhilewesternbasedonspecificevidences.GuaShahasbeenusedasatreatmentforthousandsyears,andmanypeopleadvocateitfortheirownexperience.JustlikemanyAncientChinesetechnique,wejustknowitisusefulbutwecan'texplainitclearly.Sotopersuadewesternertobelieveitseemsimpossible.Thenculturesconflicthappens.Butwecan'tdirectlyblamewesternerinthiscase.NotonlyGuaSha,butalsolaughtherapyandsoonarenotacceptedbywesternerasnormaltreatments'.sItaresponsibleattitudeforlife.Becauseweknowlittleaboutthesetreatments,wecannotmakesurewhatisgoingtohappen.Andhowweshoulddealwithit?AncientChinesehavegivenustheanswer:WhileinRome,doasRomedose.Butweshouldnotabandonourownculture,justlikeGuaSha,atreatmentthathelpsbloodcirculatebetter.SokeeponGuaShaandcommunication.MaybesomedaytherewillbeaDatongWorld.