首页 九二共识(92 consensus)

九二共识(92 consensus)

举报
开通vip

九二共识(92 consensus)九二共识(92 consensus) 九二共识(92 consensus) The 92 consensus in November 1992 the mainland's Association for relations across the Taiwan Strait and Taiwan Strait Exchange Foundation to solve NPC and CPPCC business talks how to show that reached attitude of adherin...

九二共识(92 consensus)
九二共识(92 consensus) 九二共识(92 consensus) The 92 consensus in November 1992 the mainland's Association for relations across the Taiwan Strait and Taiwan Strait Exchange Foundation to solve NPC and CPPCC business talks how to show that reached attitude of adhering to the one China principle to verbally express "both sides adhere to the principle of a Chinese" consensus. At the end of 1987, after thirty years of separation between the two sides of the Straits, the exchanges between the people on both sides of the Straits and the economic and cultural exchanges were developed, and various problems were also derived. In order to solve these problems, Taiwan has had to adjust to the "no contact, no compromise, no negotiation" "three policy", was founded in November 21, 1990 by non-governmental intermediaries authorized contact and consultation with the mainland - Straits Exchange Foundation, to handle cross-strait affairs official "inconvenience and can not come out of the". In order to facilitate contacts and talks with the SEF, the CPC Central Committee and the State Council Taiwan Affairs Office to promote the establishment of the Association for relations across the Straits in December 16, 1991, and authorized to adhere to a Chinese principle as the basis of communication and business negotiation NPC and CPPCC. In from October 28 to 30, 1992, the NPC and CPPCC held talks in Hongkong to discuss the issue of how to express the principle of adhering to the one China principle in the negotiations between the two sides of the Taiwan Straits (the use of notarization). The basic attitude is that the specific issues in cross-strait exchanges is China's internal affairs should be solved based on a Chinese principle of negotiation. In business talks, as long as the basic attitude that adhere to a Chinese principle, can not discuss the political meaning of a Chinese, the way of expression can be full consultation. During the Hongkong talks, the proposed 5 words, according to Taiwan's Straits Exchange Foundation "NUC" conclusion put forward 5 kinds of words, although the Taiwan side also agreed that cross-strait notarization is China internal affairs, both sides should adhere to a Chinese principle, and expressed the desire for national reunification but, in the text representation scheme, it is difficult to reach agreement NPC and CPPCC. At the end of the talks, and increase the SEF representative 3 kinds of expressions, and come up with the content of their final expression: "the process of joint efforts to achieve national unity in the Taiwan Strait, both sides adhere to a Chinese principle, but for a Chinese the meaning of cognition are different. In view of the frequent exchanges between the people on both sides of the Straits, in order to protect the rights and interests of the people on both sides of the Straits, the verification of documents should be properly solved." He also suggested "with their verbal statement form in a China principle", which is the main representative of the results of the talks, the SEF suggestion and the specific contents of the expression report after the official reply. Attached: 92 consensus text The "92 consensus" message, ARATS Association for relations across the Taiwan Strait in November 16, 1992 to the Taiwan Straits Exchange Foundation, on the way to express their own oral statement "about a Chinese principle, said full respect. The full text of the historical correspondence will be as follows: October 28th to 30, I will, China Notary Association staff and your staff on both sides of the Strait notarization use of work of negotiations also started on both sides of the Strait registered mail inquiry and lost compensation issues. The work of the negotiations, not only in the specific business problems has made considerable progress, but also in the cross-strait business talks expressed a China on the principle of progress, this is the result of the joint efforts of all parties concerned. Beijing in March to discuss the work after I repeatedly stated that the specific issues in cross-strait exchanges is China affairs, should be solved based on a principle of China negotiation; in business talks, as long as the basic attitude that both sides adhere to a Chinese principle, can not discuss "the political implications of a Chinese" the expression of a China principle in business talks can be fully discussed, and is willing to listen to your opinion and from all walks of life in Taiwan. In the discussion, I suggested that under the premise of mutual understanding, with our own NPC and CPPCC oral statement presented in the form of a China principle, And put forward the specific content of the expression, which clearly both sides adhere to a Chinese principle, the content has also appeared in Taiwan newspapers in Japan after. We note that Mr. Xu Huiyou made a public statement in November 1st and expressed his agreement with the above recommendations. Your letter of November 3rd officially said from Taiwan authorities agreed, "to express their own way of oral statement". I will fully respect and accept your suggestion, and has told Mr. Chen Rongjie on November 3rd. In order to make cross-strait talks as soon as possible the use of notarization grams have full power, now I will make your oral presentation points as: both sides of the Strait adhere to a Chinese principle, strive for the reunification of the country. But in the cross-strait business talks, does not involve the political meaning of a Chinese ". In this spirit, the cross strait notarization (or other negotiation matters) should be properly solved. I would suggest, after our NPC and CPPCC also agreed their own oral statement, in Beijing or Taiwan, or Xiamen Kinmen to continue talks related to specific operational problems in the draft agreement some differences, and by our NPC and CPPCC responsible person signed an agreement. "The table" in the SEF reply Taiwan Strait Exchange Foundation in December 3, 1992 to land haven (Law) number eighty-first - word no. 10457, sent a letter to the mainland Association for relations across the Taiwan Strait, ARATS reply letter of November 16th that suggest a "verbal description of their" about "a China" meaning. The SEF this historic correspondence is as follows: the association of cross-strait relations: on the "cross-strait document verification" talks about November 16th and 30 big letters were noted. In view of the "cross-strait document verification" and "indirect cross-strait registered letter inquiry and compensation" is China on both sides of human affairs question lingered for a long time, not only affect the interests of people on both sides, and make people's doubts about the exchange, is regrettable! I have just received your letter of the two show, "may take a positive attitude, signed an agreement" and "obtain complete resolution of problems, the end, we welcome. We always believe that cross-strait affairs should be related to political issues, and the two sides have different perceptions of the meaning of "one China". In order to seek a solution to the problem, we suggest oral explanation. As for the specific content of verbal instructions, press release we have released on November 3rd that said, according to "guidelines for national unification" and "the National Unification Council in August 1st this year for a" China "by resolution to express. My side of this position and that has repeatedly clarified, media in Hongkong, the mainland and Taiwan area, for both sides and that has been fully reported. There should be a pressing matter of the moment is to solve the affairs of the substantive issues, we have in Hongkong to discuss the preliminary consensus, and fully consider your opinion, finishing the draft agreement in Hongkong handed to you on behalf of your talks, for "cross-strait document verification" and "indirect cross-strait registered letter inquiry and compensation" two draft if there is still a legacy the differences, please write to our study. We attach great importance to the talks between the chairman of the board of directors and the chairman of the board of directors in singapore. As for matters related to the talks, we will actively study, to separate.
本文档为【九二共识(92 consensus)】,请使用软件OFFICE或WPS软件打开。作品中的文字与图均可以修改和编辑, 图片更改请在作品中右键图片并更换,文字修改请直接点击文字进行修改,也可以新增和删除文档中的内容。
该文档来自用户分享,如有侵权行为请发邮件ishare@vip.sina.com联系网站客服,我们会及时删除。
[版权声明] 本站所有资料为用户分享产生,若发现您的权利被侵害,请联系客服邮件isharekefu@iask.cn,我们尽快处理。
本作品所展示的图片、画像、字体、音乐的版权可能需版权方额外授权,请谨慎使用。
网站提供的党政主题相关内容(国旗、国徽、党徽..)目的在于配合国家政策宣传,仅限个人学习分享使用,禁止用于任何广告和商用目的。
下载需要: 免费 已有0 人下载
最新资料
资料动态
专题动态
is_314871
暂无简介~
格式:doc
大小:26KB
软件:Word
页数:6
分类:
上传时间:2018-03-04
浏览量:149