供应商选择调查表

Selection Tool 选择供应商的工具 Supplier Information 供应商信息： Supplier name: 供应商名称： Phone: 电话： Fax: 传真： Corporate headquarters address: 总部地址： Supplier web page address: 网址： Contact name/title: 联系人： Phone: 电话： Fax: 传真： Contact address: 联系地址： Contact email: EMAIL： Other important information: 其他重要信息： SQE Analysis SQE分析： Weight 比重 Supplier A 供应商A Supplier B 供应商B Supplier C 供应商C RTS Readiness Supplier’s Outgoing Quality Level/DPPM ]供应商出货品质水平/DPPM Supplier’s Customers Line Reject Rate 供应商客户的厂内不良率： Supplier’s Customers Field Reject Rate 供应商客户的市场不良率： Forecasted LRR @ Customer 预估的客户产线不良率 Forecasted IFIR @ Customer CUSTOMER的预期初始市场不良率 Quality System 品质系统： Quality Resources 品质资源： TOTAL (weighted) 总计 100% SQE Worksheet SQE工作 表 关于同志近三年现实表现材料材料类招标技术评分表图表与交易pdf视力表打印pdf用图表说话 pdf ： RTS Readiness    Score:                                                                                                                                  分数： Detail:    How soon may the product be successfully introduced into Customer manufacturing, and does the compatibility of the design meet Customer’s needs? 说明：        产品需要多长时间才能成功导入CUSTOMER生产， 设计 领导形象设计圆作业设计ao工艺污水处理厂设计附属工程施工组织设计清扫机器人结构设计 能力是否可以满足CUSTOMER需求？ Scoring:    1    Represents high risk to schedule and quality OR not compatible 分数：                时间及品质具有高风险性，配合度差 2 Represents medium risk to schedule or quality; compatible 时间及品质具有中等风险性，配合度好 3 Represents low risk to schedule or quality; compatible 时间及品质具有低风险性，配合度好 4 No risk to schedule or quality; compatible 时间及品质无风险性，配合度好 Comments备注:                        Supplier’s Outgoing Quality Level/DPPM    Score:    供应商出货品质等级/DPPM Detail:    (Supplier’s history)    说明              供应商的历史状况     Supplier should be measuring DPPM rates, analyzing/categorizing reasons for failures, and taking appropriate corrective actions.                     供应商能够计算出不良率，分析失效原因并加以分类，并能够剔除有效的改善对策。 Scoring:    1    Supplier does not measure DPPM rate 分数：                供应商无法计算出不良率 2 Supplier measures DPPM rate, however, there is no analysis (pareto) or corrective action 供应商能够计算出不良率，但无法提供分析及改善对策。 3 Supplier measures DPPM rate and performs analysis (pareto), however, no corrective action is taken 供应商能够计算出不良率，能够剔除原因分析，但是无法提供改善对策。 4 Supplier measures DPPM rate, performs analysis (pareto) and has effective corrective action system 供应商能够计算出不良率，提供原因分析及有效的改善对策。     General DPPM Information:                           主要的市场不良资讯：     a)    Agree to Customer’s DPPM goals:    Yes, goals are  _______        No                             是否达到CUSTOMER不良率目标：  是，目标是：      否     b)    Plan to support achievement of DPPM goals:    Yes (plan attached)                                                                                                         Plan promised by _____________                           是否有确保达到不良率目标的计划：    是（相关计划）                                                                                                   计划确定人： Comments备注:                        Supplier’s Customers’ Line Reject RateS    Score    供应商客户的厂内不良率                                                                  分数： Detail:    (Supplier’s customers’ history)______________    (Customer’s current goal)    说明：        （供应商的历史状况）                                          CUSTOMER 的现行目标 Scoring:    1    Supplier’s customers’ LRR is 2 times worse than Customer’s current goal 分数：                供应商客户的长期不良率超过CUSTOMER现行目标值的2倍 2 Supplier’s customers’ LRR is greater than Customer’s current goal, yet less than 2 times greater 供应商客户的长期不良率超过CUSTOMER现行目标值，但是小于其2倍 3 Supplier’s customers’ LRR is approximately equal to Customer’s current goal 供应商客户的长期不良率基本与CUSTOMER现行目标一致 4 Supplier’s customers’ LRR is better than Customer’s current goal 供应商客户的长期不良率优于CUSTOMER现行目标值 Supplier’s Customers’ Field Reject RateS    Score:    供应商客户的市场不良率                                                                                  分数： Detail:    (Supplier’s customers’ history)______________    (Customer’s current goal)    说明：        供应商客户的历史状况                                        CUSTOMER现行目标 Scoring:    1    Supplier’s customers’ FIR is 2 times worse than Customer’s current goal 分数：                供应商客户的市场不良率超过CUSTOMER现行目标值的2倍 2 Supplier’s customers’ FIR is greater than Customer’s current goal, yet less than 2 times greater CUSTOMER客户的市场不良率超过CUSTOMER现行目标，但低于其2倍 3 Supplier’s customers’ FIR is approximately equal to Customer’s current goal 供应商客户的市场不良率基本与CUSTOMER现行目标值一致 4 Supplier’s customers’ FIR is better than Customer’s current goal 供应商客户的市场不良率优于CUSTOMER现行目标值 Forecasted LRR @ Customer    Score:    预期的CUSTOMER产线不良率                                                                                      分数—— Detail:    (Supplier’s forecasted)_____________________    (Customer’s current goal)    说明：          供应商的预估值                                                      CUSTOMER的现行目标 Scoring:    1    Supplier’s LRR is 2 times worse than Customer’s current goal 分数：                供应商的产线不良率超过CUSTOMER现行目标值的2倍 2 Supplier’s LRR is greater than Customer’s current goal, yet less than 2 times greater 供应商的产线不良率超过CUSTOMER的现行目标值，但低于其2倍 3 Supplier’s LRR is approximately equal to Customer’s current goal 供应商的产线不良率基本与CUSTOMER现行目标值一致 4 Supplier’s LRR is better than Customer’s current goal 供应商的产线不良率优于CUSTOMER现行目标值 Forecasted IFIR @ Customer    Score:    预期的CUSTOMER早期市场不良率                                                                                分数 Detail:    (Supplier’s forecasted)_____________________    (Customer’s current goal)    说明：        供应商的预估值                                                    CUSTOMER的现行目标值 Scoring:    1    Supplier’s IFIR is 2 times worse than Customer’s current goal 分数                    供应商的早期市场不良率超过CUSTOMER现行目标值的2倍 2 Supplier’s IFIR is greater than Customer’s current goal, yet less than 2 times greater 供应商的早期市场不良率超过CUSTOMER的现行目标值，但低于其2倍 3 Supplier’s IFIR is approximately equal to Customer’s current goal 供应商的早期市场不良率基本于CUSTOMER现行目标值一致 4 Supplier’s IFIR is better than Customer’s current goal 供应商的早期市场不良率优于CUSTOMER现行目标 Quality SYSTEM    Score:    品质系统                                                                                                              分数 Detail细则: a)  ISO Certification:    1  Yes (circle one:  9001  9002)        0  No a) ISO认证                          b) Customer Quality Systems Audit scoring ranges: b)    品质系统稽核得分     0    Less than 70%  (Not Approved)     2    Between 70–89%  (Conditionally Approved)     4    Between 90–100%  (Approved) Quality Resources     Score:    品质资源                                                                                                              分数                    Detail细则:     The Supplier should have a dedicated Quality Department with adequate staffing resources to attend to tactical issues and a Quality Manager with time to attend to strategic issues. Additionally, Supplier should be willing to appoint a Joint Quality Engineer for each mfg site.                     供应商应当建立专门的品保系统、足够的品保员工参与品质问题的解决，任命品保经理参与公司决策，另外供应商还要在每个制造厂任命一名JQE Scoring:    1    Inadequate resources 系统不健全 2 Quality staff; however, no Quality Manager 有品保员工，但没有专职品保经理 3 Quality Department and dedicated Quality Manager 有品保员工和专职品保经理 4 Quality Department, Quality Manager, and willing to appoint a JQE 有品保员工和专职品保经理，同意任命一名JQE Local Support支持    Score:    Detail:    Supplier capability to meet Customer’s “Supplier Quality Standard” 细则：          供应商目前的状况可以满足客户的“SQS” Scoring:    1    No commitment to support and won’t be ready until 3 months after First Customer Ship                             第一次客户调查没有达到要求且3个月内都没有完成客户的要求 2 Exists but poor execution, or won’t be ready until 1 month after FCS 3 客户的要求已经改正但改善效果不好，且客户调查后一个月内都没有达成相关要求 4 Exists but not totally meeting expectations, or Supplier can have in place at FCS 基本已经满足客户要求或客户调查时能够及时改善 5 Already exists and meeting expectations 完全满足客户要求