英语专业四级作文
模板
个人简介word模板免费下载关于员工迟到处罚通告模板康奈尔office模板下载康奈尔 笔记本 模板 下载软件方案模板免费下载
Will Electronic Dictionaries Kill Printed Dictionaries? Numerous individuals, contemporarily, prefer to
utilize electronic dictionaries rather than printed paper
ones for the reason that electronic dictionaries carry
much less weight, occupy smaller space and are more
convenient to be brought along with everywhere.
There is a general acknowledgement that printed
dictionaries will gradually fade out of our sight
eventually. On the contrary side of the commonly accepted viewpoint, I firmly believe that electronic
dictionaries will not kill printed ones.
First, printed dictionaries consume students less
financial resources (require smaller budget) than the
electronic ones. An inconceivable number of students,
who apply dictionaries most frequently, are barely able
to afford the costly expense of an electronic dictionary. Hence, the printed exactly satisfy their demands.
Second, scholars are in favor of the printed ones other than e-dictionaries. What a teacher used to do is (to)
hold a thick, heavy dictionary, and I assume that they
tend to preserve their long formed habit. Third, it is
only the printed dictionaries that can be collected into
on our private bookshelves. We are libraries or be placed
likely to constantly apply electronic dictionary, and
nevertheless, we will never collect it since it is designed
to be used for its convenience, not to be collected.
Undoubtedly, electronic dictionaries will enjoy
enormous popularity/be prevalent in the future because of their convenience and portability while the printed ones are indispensable and will not be substituted by the former. Each of dictionaries is just complementary to the other.
浙公网安备 33021202002483