首页 2010年上外复试 经验谈--高翻 翻硕

2010年上外复试 经验谈--高翻 翻硕

举报
开通vip

2010年上外复试 经验谈--高翻 翻硕 高翻 MA 小经验—逗你玩 今年有幸如愿的被高翻 MA 录取,还拿了个一等奖学金 本来想发榜完就来写点小小 经验的,没想受朋友邀请去嘉兴玩了两天,今天刚回来。言归正传—— 初试:翻译综合,主要看了译介学,其它参考书都略看了一遍,此外去图书馆多借了其它 翻译理论的书来看,比如说《西方翻译简史》,《当代翻译理论》,《西方翻译理论流派》 等等,后面这些书反而细看了。今年翻译综合与前几年不同,后面三个大题都与口译有关, 笔译的理论到没有,白那么辛苦背了 幸好看了下吉尔和塞莱斯科维奇的口译理论, 还...

2010年上外复试 经验谈--高翻 翻硕
高翻 MA 小 经验 班主任工作经验交流宣传工作经验交流材料优秀班主任经验交流小学课改经验典型材料房地产总经理管理经验 —逗你玩 今年有幸如愿的被高翻 MA 录取,还拿了个一等奖学金 本来想发榜完就来写点小小 经验的,没想受朋友邀请去嘉兴玩了两天,今天刚回来。言归正传—— 初试:翻译综合,主要看了译介学,其它参考书都略看了一遍,此外去图书馆多借了其它 翻译理论的书来看,比如说《西方翻译简史》,《当代翻译理论》,《西方翻译理论流派》 等等,后面这些书反而细看了。今年翻译综合与前几年不同,后面三个大题都与口译有关, 笔译的理论到没有,白那么辛苦背了 幸好看了下吉尔和塞莱斯科维奇的口译理论, 还算过关。希望大家对口译理论也要重视啊。今年我的翻译综合考了 133. 翻译实践:英翻中,多看下 Times 和 economist, 中翻 英看平时积累了,偶尔拿领导人的发言对照它的译文来看看。今年我的翻译实践是 126. 二外:我的二外是法语。公共法语前后看了三遍,重点 在语法,单词, 法语考试并不难,我考了 88, 感觉花二外上的时间多了点,本可以拿来 放在专业课上的。 政治:我报了领航的重点班和点睛班,冲刺班没报, 感觉还有点用。因为我 高中 高中语文新课程标准高中物理选修31全套教案高中英语研修观课报告高中物理学习方法和技巧高中数学说课稿范文 是理科,政治很糟糕,报班的好处是帮我把政治全梳理了一遍。 当然报不报班看自己,有些不报的考的很高的也有很多。我今年政治考了 75,出乎我意料, 本来想过个国家线就可以了 复试 专业笔试 4 月 12 日 中午 12:00-13:00 考的是一片中翻英,一片英翻 中,因为时间很紧,许多同学都来不及。中翻英是篇散文性质的,讲的好像是天山上的湖, 哈萨克族的一个传说什么的,很难; 英翻中是事实类的,比较简单。 注意:分配好时间, 以免来不及做完。 二外听说 4 月 12 日 下午 14: 00 问的问题比较简单,就自我介绍,来自哪里,家庭情况,天气等等,只要会说 一点就行了,不会了就说 pardon,老师不会为难的。 专业面试 4 月 13 日 下午 13: 00 这是重头戏了。进去前十分的紧张,导致我把准考证忘带进教室了。进去后,前面 坐着 6、7 个老师。先是问我准考证号,我只好道歉说我忘带了,幸好老师说只要报最后那 四位就行了,还好我记过,就说了。然后是柴院长问我为什么选这个专业,再跟据我回答的 提几个问题,如你以后要做翻译实践还是理论(我答了理论), 以后准备研究哪一领域等, 都是用英语答的。老师们都很和蔼,面试过程我不是很紧张,大约 5、6 分钟的样子就结束 ???? ???????? http://club.topsage.com/thread-2407892-1-1.html ???? 了,很快的。 第一次写经验,希望对大家有点帮助,呵呵。 Phoebechen--LZ 很有效率。说得也很详细。这次复试应该有见过,可惜了没有认识一下, 只能等开学了。 这边我也说说我的感受吧,高翻 MA 的信息不多,之前在这个论坛里面还是得到好多宝贵的 信息。也希望自己能为以后的同学提供点帮助。 初试: 翻译综合 133:我大概看了十多本理论书。除了 LZ 列的那些,还有《翻译学词典》、《译 介学导论》等。谢老的那几本 内容 财务内部控制制度的内容财务内部控制制度的内容人员招聘与配置的内容项目成本控制的内容消防安全演练内容 差不多,但译介学导论中对当代的几个流派有所介绍,个 人觉得还是可以看看。综合重点还是看《译介学》、《西方翻译简史》、《当代翻译理论流 派》。口译理论也要多加重视。10 年综合题型是:术语英译汉(与时政有关的,比如说二 氧化碳减排之类的);名词解释(比如 mother tounge 之类的,一般是和翻译理论、语言学 有关的)。这两道题考的是一般常识,平时多加积累。然后就是两道开放题,具体题目记不 得了,应该是和口译有关的。最后一道题目要对比 word-for-word 和 sense-for-sense translation。 翻译实践 126:第一题是一篇英文文章(文体如经济学人一样),先是有 10 个左右的 CLOZE, 自己填,没有选项。然后就将最后三段译成中文。(我平时练英译汉比较多,这次英译汉只 要求三段,建议以后的同学能更好地安排练习时间。);第二篇就是纯粹的汉译英,不是商 务、政治方面的题材,像是社论文,文体比较口语化,题目类似于“凡事上纲上线累不累”。 (个人觉得平时练习汉译英时可以各种文本都涉及到,我之前只看了点商务笔译教程上的一 些文章,练得不多,考试时候只能硬着头皮做。) 二外(日语) 77:论坛里面二外日语的消息不多,考法语的同学可能多些。买了上外要求 的新编日语 1-3,但真正仔细看的只有 1 和 2。但考试时候发现有些副词和句型其实是 3 里 面的,有些印象,但不记不清。建议同学们要不想或者没有时间看 3的话至少把 3 里面的副 词和句型看看。这次日语题型是:写出单词要求注音以及写了读音要求写单词;副词填空; 选词填空(这个涉及面比较广,以副词和特定句型为主);句子翻译(这个比较简单,平时 看看书就行);两篇阅读(这次阅读都是选择题,也不难)。二外和政治只需要过国家线, 个人觉得只要保证过 60 分就行,多花时间在专业课上。因为大家也知道上外复试算的是技 术分(总分乘以百分之十加两门专业课),所以这两门多考 10 分和专业课多考 1分是一样 的。不过个人感受,只供参考。 政治 67:本人高中学理且高一下学期就分科了。暑假 8 月份报了海天的强化班上了两个星 期,之后就没有动过书。直到十一过后才忽然醒悟离考研不远了,这次开始每天泡图书馆看 各种书。但我觉得我犯了个错误。我一直用的是海天的教材上海天的课程。但说实话,这年 海天在政治辅导上的 关于同志近三年现实表现材料材料类招标技术评分表图表与交易pdf视力表打印pdf用图表说话 pdf 现挺差强人意的。所以我觉得以后的同学们可以集思广益,多上几个 ???? ???????? http://club.topsage.com/thread-2407892-1-1.html ???? 不同机构的课或者多看几个机构的书和题。当然自己有信心的完全可以不用报班的。过线并 不难,但也不能大意。我这次就一直害怕政治不能过线,灰心失望地过完年就回学校找工作 了。所以大家还是要谨慎对待。 复试: 笔试:两篇翻译。汉译英完全没料到是散文,一看头就大了,直接开始做英译汉(英译汉比 较像经济学人上的文体)。时间不够,散文没做完。不过我至今没琢磨出来,这个测试到底 是看速度还是看质量。 二外日语口试:先是自我介绍,然后问家庭,学校日语多久了。口语一直没怎么练,进去之 前做好了最坏的准备,也就是一句都听不懂。老师很亲切,问题也都不难,很快就完了。 专业面试:先是柴教授问为什么要考上外高翻;然后就我的回答提了很多问题;之后姚教授 又问我想做学者还是译员,然后也是就我的回答提了问题。总共可能 10 多分钟。老师都很 和蔼。进去了就不紧张了。 希望会有帮助吧。 翻译专业硕士(MTI)入学考试(复试)题目—aide521 1.cloze Blaming China will not solve America’s problem By Stephen Roach Published: March 29 2010 20:33 | Last updated: March 29 2010 20:33 America’s fixation on the “China problem” is now boiling over. From Google to the renminbi, China is being blamed for all that ails the US. Unfortunately, this reflects a potentially lethal combination of political scapegoating and bad economics. The political pressures are grounded in the angst of American workers. After more than a decade of stagnant real compensation and, more recently, a sharp upsurge in unemployment, US labour is being squeezed as never before. Understandably, voters want answers. It is all because of the trade deficit, they are told – a visible manifestation of a major loss of production to foreign competition. With China and its so-called manipulated currency having accounted for fully 39 per cent of the US trade deficit in 2008-09, Washington maintains that American workers can only ???? ???????? http://club.topsage.com/thread-2407892-1-1.html ???? benefit if it gets tough with Beijing. EDITOR’S CHOICE China warned of growing ‘land loan’ threat - Mar-28China fund celebrates at conference - Mar-28Opinion: China’s time for lying low has ended - Mar-28Washington’s tricky debate over renminbi - Mar-28Editorial: China’s moral hazard - Mar-02China tells banks to halt lending - Jan-20However appealing this argument may seem, it is premised on bad economics. In 2008-09, the US had trade deficits with more than 90 countries. That means it has a multilateral trade deficit. Yet aided and abetted by some of America’s most renowned economists, Washington now advocates a bilateral fix – either a sharp revaluation of the renminbi or broad-based tariffs on Chinese imports. A bilateral remedy for a multilateral problem is like rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic. Unless the problems that have given rise to the multilateral trade deficit are addressed, bilateral intervention would simply shift the Chinese portion of America’s international imbalance to someone else. That “someone” would most likely be a higher-cost producer – in effect, squeezing the purchasing power of hard-pressed US consumers. The US would be far better served if it faced up to why it is confronted with a massive multilateral trade deficit. America’s core economic problem is saving, not China. In 2009, the broadest measure of domestic US saving – the net national saving rate – fell to a record low of -2.5 per cent of national income. That means America must import surplus saving from abroad to fund its future growth – and run current account and trade deficits to attract the foreign capital. Thus, for a savings-short economy, there is no escaping large multilateral trade imbalances. Yes, China is the biggest piece of America’s multilateral trade deficit. But that is because high-cost US companies are turning to China as a low-cost offshore efficiency solution. It also reflects the preferences of US consumers for low-cost and increasingly high-quality goods made in China. In other words, savings-short America is actually quite fortunate to have China as a large trading partner. No, China is hardly perfect. Like the US, it, too, has a large imbalance with the rest of the world – namely, an outsize current account surplus. Just as responsible ???? ???????? http://club.topsage.com/thread-2407892-1-1.html ???? global citizenship requires America to address its savings deficiency, the world has every reason to expect the same from China in reducing its surplus saving. But these adjustments must be framed in the multilateral context in which the imbalances exist. Just as China is one of more than 90 countries with which America runs trade deficits, US-China trade now represents only 12 per cent of total Chinese trade. It is wrong to fixate on a bilateral solution between these two nations to address their multilateral imbalances. Yet some of America’s most prominent economists are claiming that a revaluation of the renminbi vis-à-vis the dollar would not only create more than 1m jobs in the US but that it would inject new vigour into an otherwise anaemic global recovery. Economists should know better. Changes in relative prices are the ultimate zero-sum game – they re-slice the pie rather than expand or shrink it. Currency, or relative price, adjustments between any two nations are not a panacea for structural imbalances in the global economy. What is needed, instead, is a shift in the mix of global saving. Specifically, America needs deficit reduction and an increase in personal saving, while China needs to stimulate internal private consumption. Washington’s scapegoating of China could take the world to the brink of a very slippery slope. It would not be the first time that political denial was premised on bad economics. But the consequences of such a blunder – trade frictions and protectionism – would make the crisis of 2008-09 look like child’s play. 2.reading and comprehension China knows the time for lying low has ended By Ian Bremmer 2010-04-02 (www.ftchinese.com) With Google pulling out of China and US senators urging the White House to exert pressure for a renminbi revaluation, friction between the world's great powers seems depressingly normal. Sadly the reality is even worse. The mutual dependence of America and China is grounded in commercial ties, and the ???? ???????? http://club.topsage.com/thread-2407892-1-1.html ???? two sides will be doing business for decades to come. But a new conflict is unfolding that could be more dangerous even than the cold war. Soviet economic decisions had little impact on western standards of living. But today, globalisation means there is no equivalent to the Berlin Wall. Nothing can insulate China and America from each other's turmoil. The list of irritants in US-Chinese relations reaches beyond the current rows over Google and the renminbi, to include broader cyberattacks, disagreements over Iranian sanctions, China's failure to protect intellectual property, and trade disputes over tyres and steel pipes. There are other nascent conflicts, too – from control of natural resources to the militarisation of the Indian Ocean. These problems are symptoms of an illness that has progressed further than most observers realise. Put bluntly, Beijing no longer believes American power is indispensable to Chinese economic expansion and the Communist party's political survival. China's leadership has begun to consider a gradual shift in its global strategy. Though this will not be easy to carry out, it is now quietly embarking on political and economic “decoupling” from the US. This rethink began when the (western) financial meltdown put millions of Chinese out of work in early 2009. The shock undermined a number of Beijing's basic assumptions. Most significantly, China had “coupled” its growth to the west, becoming an export powerhouse to ensure ever rising standards of living. This strategy lasted for 20 years – but is now coming to a close. To the careful observer, the signs have been clear for some time. We glimpsed a new standpoint at December's climate change summit in Copenhagen and in the strong reaction last month to America's announcement of arms sales to Taiwan and to US president Barack Obama's meeting with the Dalai Lama. A change of heart can also be seen in signs of coming economic reforms – but in this case Washington's problem might be that change does not come fast enough. China is signalling that it wants its model of growth to rely more on its growing consumer base. Some Chinese officials predict Beijing can create a truly consumption-driven economy in only five years. But it will not happen this rapidly, for political and structural reasons. For minimum industrial disruption, this plan must be undertaken ???? ???????? http://club.topsage.com/thread-2407892-1-1.html ???? with great care. More significantly, Chinese officials argue that their country's resilience in the face of America's meltdown has vindicated China's “state capitalist” system. As a result, the commitment to building national champions is intensifying, and international companies are decrying Beijing's preferences for domestic rivals. The shift is also visible beyond China's borders. While China will not mount a military challenge to the US any time soon, its ambitions to extend its influence in Asia and its plan to do business in far-flung places have given new momentum to its military plans. Military spending is thought to have gone through double-digit growth every year for the past decade – indicating a potential regional arms race. A broader shift in the balance of power is also likely to empower Chinese hawks to call for greater resistance to US pressure in places such as North Korea, Burma and Sudan. What should America do? The answer is politically deeply problematic. China once saw the US as indispensable to its rise. It no longer does. So Washington must press harder for a sustainable, interconnected global recovery, while avoiding undue barriers to Chinese trade and investment in America. The US must also drive the participation of like-minded countries when engaging China on key diplomatic and economic issues. Avoiding a trade war is vital, as it would bolster China's notion of US dispensability even more. The extent of China's change hit me most clearly during the Copenhagen talks, when He Yafei, Chinese vice- foreign minister, dressed down Mr Obama during a meeting that Premier Wen Jiabao was expected to attend. It brought to mind Deng Xiaoping's famous dictum that China must “keep a low profile and never take the lead”. Now Beijing thinks the time for it to lie low has ended. The west must respond with wisdom and a firm hand, or low rumbling tensions will quickly grow into something much more damaging. The writer is president of Eurasia Group and author of The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? A longer version of this article appears in this month's Prospect magazine ???? ???????? http://club.topsage.com/thread-2407892-1-1.html ???? 只想起来 16 个空格,还有四个楼主想想 grounded more recently voters want answers accounted for gets tough Unless the purchasing power core economic problem a record low run current account that is because made in China a large imbalance Just as a revaluation of the renminbi know better 翻译专业硕士(MTI)入学考试(复试)面试题目 李稻葵:回顾过去 60 年。30 年前,我们都很清楚,这代人刚刚在读中学,那个时候大家 的自信心,是不强的。政治上有一点自信心,往往是比较盲目,需要做各种各样的宣传,才 能让年轻人树立自己的自信心。通过 30 年的发展,这个自信心逐步建立起来。现在来提大 国崛起的口号,是一个漫长的,我们个人来讲,漫长的历史的演变的结果。60 年对于个人 而言是很长的时间,对于历史而言是一瞬间,是一个历史演变的结果。 ???? ???????? http://club.topsage.com/thread-2407892-1-1.html ????
本文档为【2010年上外复试 经验谈--高翻 翻硕】,请使用软件OFFICE或WPS软件打开。作品中的文字与图均可以修改和编辑, 图片更改请在作品中右键图片并更换,文字修改请直接点击文字进行修改,也可以新增和删除文档中的内容。
该文档来自用户分享,如有侵权行为请发邮件ishare@vip.sina.com联系网站客服,我们会及时删除。
[版权声明] 本站所有资料为用户分享产生,若发现您的权利被侵害,请联系客服邮件isharekefu@iask.cn,我们尽快处理。
本作品所展示的图片、画像、字体、音乐的版权可能需版权方额外授权,请谨慎使用。
网站提供的党政主题相关内容(国旗、国徽、党徽..)目的在于配合国家政策宣传,仅限个人学习分享使用,禁止用于任何广告和商用目的。
下载需要: 免费 已有0 人下载
最新资料
资料动态
专题动态
is_875195
暂无简介~
格式:pdf
大小:164KB
软件:PDF阅读器
页数:8
分类:
上传时间:2012-01-29
浏览量:73