关于英语学能的参考书目

1. Carroll. J . 1981. Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude [ A ] . In K. Diller ( ed. ) .1981. 2. Carroll. J . 1990. Cognitive abilities in foreign language aptitude : Then and now [A ] . In T. Parry & C. Stansfield (eds. ) . 1990. 3. Carroll , J . & S. Sapon. 1999. Modern Language Aptitude Test ( Form A ) [ M ] . Bethesda , Maryland : ·457 ·Second Language Testing Inc. 4. Carroll , J . & S. Sapon. 2002. Modern Language Aptitude Test Manual [M] . Bethesda , Maryland : Sec2 ond Language Testing Inc. 5. Diller , K. (ed. ) . 1981. Individual Differences and Universals in Language Learning A ptitude [ C ] . Rowley , MA : Newbury House. 6. Ehrman , M. 1998. The Modern Language Aptitude Test for predicting learning success and advising students[J ] . Applied Language Learning 9 : 31270. 7.Ehrman , M. & R. Oxford. 1995. Cognition plus : Correlates of language learning success [J ] . The Modern Language Journal 79 : 67289. 8. Grigorenko , E. , R. Sternberg & M. Ehrman. 2000. A theory based approach to the measurement of foreign language learning ability : The CanalF theory and test [J ] . The Modern Language Journal 84 : 3902 405. 9. Harley , B. & D. Hart . 1997. Language aptitude and second language proficiency in classroom learners of different starting ages [J ] . Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19 : 3792400. 10. Kiss , C. & M. Nikolov. 2005. Developing , piloting ,and validating an instrument to measure young learners aptitude [J ] . Language Learning 55 : 992150. 11’.Nyikos , M. 1990. Sex related differences in adult language learning : Socialization and memory factors [J ] . The Modern Language Journal 74 : 2732287. 12. Oxford , R. 1990a. Language Learning Strategies :What Every Teacher Should Know [ M] . Boston : Heinle & Heinle Publishers. 13. Oxford , R. 1990b. Style , strategies , and aptitude : Connections for language learning [A] . In T. Parry & C. Stansfield (eds. ) . 1990. 14. Parry , T. & C. Stansfield ( eds. ) . 1990. Language Aptitude Reconsidered [ C] . Englewood Cliffs , N. J . : Prentice Hall. 15. Robinson , P. (ed. ) . 2002. Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning [ C ] . Philadelphia : John Benjamins. 16. Rosemary , E. 2005. Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition [ J ] . Language Teaching Research 9 :1472172. 17. Sasaki , M. 1996. Second Language Proficiency , Foreign Language Aptitude , and Intelligence : Quantitative and Qualitative Analyses [ M] . 18. New York :Peter Lang.Sawyer , M. & L. Ranta. 2001. Aptitude , individual difference , and instructional design [ A ] . In P. 19.Skehan , P. 1986. The role of foreign language aptitude in a model of school learning [J ] . L anguage Testing 3 : 1882221. 20. Skehan , P. 2002. Theorizing and updating aptitude[A] . In P. Robinson (ed. ) . 2002. 21. Sparks , R. et al. 1998. Factors in the prediction of achievement and proficiency in a foreign language [J ] . Applied Language Learning 9 : 712105. 22. Sparks , R. & L. Ganschow. 2001. Aptitude for learning a foreign language [J ] . A nnual Review of A p2 plied Linguistics 21 : 902111.