首页 英语四级考试阅读备考材料(2)

英语四级考试阅读备考材料(2)

举报
开通vip

英语四级考试阅读备考材料(2)英语四级考试阅读备考材料(2) 英语四级考试阅读备考材料(2) 英语四级考试阅读备考材料 (2)TheLawsofNatureThephraseAlawofNatureisprobablyrarerinmodernscientificwritingthanwasthecasesomegenerationsago.Thisispartlyduetoaverynaturalobjectiontot The Laws of Nature The phrase "A law of Nature" is probabl...

英语四级考试阅读备考材料(2)
英语四级考试阅读备考材料(2) 英语四级考试阅读备考材料(2) 英语四级考试阅读备考材料 (2)TheLawsofNatureThephraseAlawofNatureisprobablyrarerinmodernscientificwritingthanwasthecasesomegenerationsago.Thisispartlyduetoaverynaturalobjectiontot The Laws of Nature The phrase "A law of Nature" is probably rarer in modern scientific writing than was the case some generations ago. This is partly due to a very natural objection to the use of the word "law" in two different senses. Human societies have laws. In primitive societies there is no distinction between law and custom. Some things are done, others are not. This is regarded as part of the nature of things, and generally as an unalterable fact. If customs change, the change is too slow to be observed. Later on kings and prophets could promulgate new laws, but there was no way of revoking old ones. The Greek democracies made the great and revolutionary discovery that a netmunity could consciously make new laws and repeal old ones. So for us a human law is something which is valid only over a certain number of people for a certain period of time. Laws of Nature, however, are not netmands but statements of facts. The use of the same word is unfortunate. It would be better to speak of uniformities of Nature. This would do away with the elementary fallacy that a law implies a law-giver. Incidentally, it might just as well imply a parliament or soviet of atoms. But the difference between the two uses of the word is fundamental. If a piece of matter does not obey a law of Nature it is not punished. On the contrary, we say that the law has been incorrectly stated, It is quite probable that every law of Nature so far stated has been stated incorrectly. Certainly many of them have. Nevertheless, these inaccurately stated laws are of immense practical and theoretical value. They fall into two classes-qualitative laws such as "All animals with feathers have beaks", and quantitative laws such as "Mercury has 13,596 times the density of water"(at 0?C and 1 atmosphere's pressure). The first of these is a very good guide. But it was probably not true in the past. For many birds which were certainly feathered had teeth and may not have had beaks. And it is quite possibly not today. There are about a hundred thousand million birds on our planet, and it may well be that two or three of them are freaks which have not developed a beak. But have lived long enough to grow feathers. It was thought to be a law of Nature that female mammals (defined as warm-blooded vertebrates with hair) had mammary glands, until Prof. Crew of Edinburgh found that many congenitally hairless female mice lacked these organs, though they could bear young which other females could then foster. And quantitative laws generally turn out to be inexact. Thus water is nothing definite. It is a mixture of at least six different substances. For in the molecule H20, one or both of the hydrogen atoms may be either light or heavy, and so may the oxygen atom. Similarly, mercury consists of several different types of atom. Thus the ratio of the densities of mercury and water is not fixed, though in the case of ordinary samples the variation is too small to be detected. But it can be detected if the water happens to have been taken from an accumulator which has been used for some time. In his theory of Probability (Oxford, 1939) Jefferys has something new to say about induction. Two contradictory theories are in vogue as to the laws of Nature. The older view is that they are absolute, though of course they may have been inaccurately formulated. The extreme positivistic view, enunciated by Vaihinger, is that we can only say that phenomena occur as if certain laws held. There is no sense in making any definite statements, though it is convenient to do so. Now Jeffreys points out that, if a number of observations have been found to conform to a law, it is highly probable that the next one will do so whether the law is true or not. In Jeffrey's words "A well-verified hypothesis will probably continue to lead to correct inferences even if it is wrong. " 上一篇英语: 英语四级考试阅读备考材料(1)下一篇英语: 英语四 级考试阅读备考材料(3)查看更多关于CET阅读的文章网友同时还浏 览了: 什么是雅思机经,如何巧用雅思机 雅思写作评分标准任务完成情况 雅思写作评分标准:连贯与衔接 雅思写作评分标准:词汇资源 雅思写作评分标准:语法的多样性 雅思考试合格标准
本文档为【英语四级考试阅读备考材料(2)】,请使用软件OFFICE或WPS软件打开。作品中的文字与图均可以修改和编辑, 图片更改请在作品中右键图片并更换,文字修改请直接点击文字进行修改,也可以新增和删除文档中的内容。
该文档来自用户分享,如有侵权行为请发邮件ishare@vip.sina.com联系网站客服,我们会及时删除。
[版权声明] 本站所有资料为用户分享产生,若发现您的权利被侵害,请联系客服邮件isharekefu@iask.cn,我们尽快处理。
本作品所展示的图片、画像、字体、音乐的版权可能需版权方额外授权,请谨慎使用。
网站提供的党政主题相关内容(国旗、国徽、党徽..)目的在于配合国家政策宣传,仅限个人学习分享使用,禁止用于任何广告和商用目的。
下载需要: 免费 已有0 人下载
最新资料
资料动态
专题动态
is_633423
暂无简介~
格式:doc
大小:18KB
软件:Word
页数:3
分类:
上传时间:2018-06-18
浏览量:4