HEAInternational Education and Foreign Language Studies Domestic Programs(OPE)：heainternational教育和外语研究的国内项目（OPE）

HEAInternational Education and Foreign Language Studies Domestic Programs(OPE)：heainternational教育和外语研究的国内项目（OPE） HEA: International Education and Foreign Language Studies Domestic Programs (OPE) FY 2010 Program Performance Report (System Print Out) Strategic Goal 3 Multiple HEA, Title VI, Parts A and B Document Year 2010 Appropriation: $ CFDA 84.015: National Resource Centers and Fellowships Program for Language and Area or Language and International Studies 84.016: Undergraduate International Studies and Foreign Language Programs 84.017: International Research and Studies 84.153A: Business and International Education Program 84.220: Centers for International Business Education 84.220A: Centers for International Education Business 84.229A: Language Resource Centers 84.274A: American Overseas Research Centers 84.337: Technological Innovation and Cooperation for Foreign Information Access Program Goal: To meet the nation's security and economic needs through the development of a national capacity in foreign languages, and area and international studies. Objective 1 of 9: The National Resource Centers (NRC) Program provides grants to institutions of higher education or consortia of institutions of higher education to establish, strengthen, and operate comprehensive and undergraduate language and area/international studies centers. Measure 1.1 of 4: Percentage of less and least commonly taught languages as defined by the Secretary of Education taught at Title VI National Resource Centers. (Desired direction: increase) 89a0bu Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2008 Set a Baseline 37 Target Met 2009 999 (December 2011) Pending 2010 999 (December 2011) Pending 2011 null37 Not Collected Pending 2012 38 (December 2013) Pending 2013 38 (December 2014) Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), National Resource Centers (NRC) Program, annual and final reports. Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. This is a new measure that focuses on Title VI’s mission of maintaining national capacity in a broad range of less and least commonly taught foreign languages. The numerator is the total number of less and least commonly taught languages as defined by the Secretary of Education taught at NRCs in a given fiscal year. The denominator is the total number of less and least commonly taught languages as defined by the Secretary of Education. FY 2008 data will be used to establish the baseline; and targets are expected to be set beginning in 2009. This measure is intended to replace the measure: percentage of critical languages taught, as reflected by the list of critical languages referenced in the HEA Title VI program statute. The current list of 171 languages was developed in 1985. A list of less and least commonly taught languages is U.S. Department of Education 1 03/16/2011 Draft being developed from which the Secretary would select certain languages as “critical need languages.” Measure 1.2 of 4: Percentage of critical need languages as defined by the Secretary of Education taught at National Resource Centers. (Desired direction: increase) 89a0bv Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2008 Set a Baseline 81 Target Met 2009 999 (December 2011) Pending 2010 999 (December 2011) Pending 2011 81 Measure not in place 2012 82 Measure not in place 2013 82 Measure not in place Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), National Resource Centers (NRC) Program, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. This is a new measure that focuses on critical need languages and will capture how well our programs respond to new and unanticipated language challenges. The numerator is the total number of critical need languages as defined by the Secretary of Education taught at NRCs in a given academic year. The denominator is the total number of critical need languages as defined by the Secretary of Education. A list of less and least commonly taught languages is being developed from which the Secretary would select certain languages as “critical need languages.” FY 2008 data will be used to establish the baseline; and targets are expected to be set beginning in 2009. Measure 1.3 of 4: Percentage of National Resource Center grants teaching intermediate or advanced courses in critical need languages as defined by the Secretary of Education. (Desired direction: increase) 89a0by Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2008 Set a Baseline 63 Target Met 2009 999 (December 2011) Pending 2010 999 (December 2011) Pending 2011 null63 Not Collected Pending 2012 64 (December 2013) Pending 2013 64 (December 2014) Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), National Resource Centers (NRC) Program, annual and final reports Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. This is a new measure that focuses on critical need languages and will capture how well our programs respond to new and unanticipated language challenges. The numerator is the total number of NRC grants teaching intermediate or advanced courses in critical need languages U.S. Department of Education 2 03/16/2011 Draft as defined by the Secretary of Education. If a FLAS Fellow attending an NRC institution lists an intermediate or advanced course in critical need languages, that NRC institution will be added to the numerator if it is not already included. The denominator is the total number of all NRC grants. A list of less and least commonly taught languages is being developed from which the Secretary would select certain languages as “critical need languages.” FY 2008 data will be used to establish the baseline; and targets are expected to be set beginning in 2009. Measure 1.4 of 4: Percentage of NRC master’s and doctoral graduates who report that they found employment that utilizes their language and area skills. (Desired direction: increase) 89a0e2 Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2008 Set a Baseline (December 2009) Pending 2009 999 (December 2010) Pending 2010 999 (December 2011) Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), National Resource Centers (NRC) Program, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. Graduates who earn at least 15 hours worth of credits and major in a wide range of disciplines will be tracked through this measure. Some of the graduates might also be FLAS students; hence there is some duplication between this measure and the FLAS employment measure. The numerator is the number of NRC master's and doctoral graduates who report that they found employment that utilizes their language and area skills. The denominator is the number of NRC master's and doctoral graduates who report they they found employment. FY 2008 data will be used to establish the baseline; and targets are expected to be set beginning in 2009. This measure is intended to replace the percentage of National Resource Center Ph.D. graduates who find employment in higher education, government, and national security that is being phased out because it is not a good measure of the results from NRC funding and the authorizing statute does not promote employment in a particular field. Objective 2 of 9: The Foreign Language and Area Studies (FLAS) Fellowship Program provides academic year and summer fellowships to institutions of higher education to assist graduate students in foreign language and either area or international studies. Measure 2.1 of 4: Efficiency measure: cost per Foreign Language and Area Studies (FLAS) Fellowship Program fellow increasing average language competency by at least one level. (Desired direction: decrease) 7996 Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2005 14,962 Measure not in place 2006 999 15,771 Did Not Meet Target 2007 999 16,347 Did Not Meet Target 2008 999 16,251 Made Progress From Prior Year U.S. Department of Education 3 03/16/2011 Draft 2009 999 (March 2011) Pending 2011 null16,000 Not Collected Pending 2012 16,000 (December 2013) Pending 2013 16,000 (December 2014) Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), Foreign Language and Areas Studies (FLAS) Fellowship Program, annual and final performance reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. The calculation is the annual appropriation for FLAS divided by the number of FLAS fellowship recipients increasing their average competency score by at least one point from pre- to post-test. The 2004 actual value reflects an appropriation of $27.0 million divided by 1,546 successful fellows. The 2005 actual value reflects an appropriation of $28.0 million divided by 1,647 successful fellows. For FY 2006-2009, this is an efficiency measure without targets. Measure 2.2 of 4: The average competency score of Foreign Language and Area Studies (FLAS) Fellowship Program recipients at the end of one full year of instruction minus the average score at the beginning of the year. (Desired direction: increase) 1671 Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2004 1.2 1.22 Target Exceeded 2005 1.2 1.22 Target Exceeded 2006 1.2 1.15 Did Not Meet Target 2007 1.2 1.06 Did Not Meet Target 2008 1.2 1.01 Did Not Meet Target 2009 1.2 (March 2011) Pending 2010 1.2 (December 2011) Pending 2011 1.2 (December 2012) Pending 2012 1.2 (December 2013) Pending 2013 1.2 (March 2015) Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), Foreign Language and Areas Studies (FLAS) Fellowship Program, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. Overall change in the language competency self-assessment reflects a mix of different levels of improvement at all stages (beginner, intermediate, advanced) of the three modalities of language acquisition that the assessment measures (reading, writing, speaking and listening). Beginning language students may be expected to make larger advances over a given time period (and therefore have larger change scores) than more advanced students. A target value of 1.2 for change over the year reflects an ambitious overall goal for the program. U.S. Department of Education 4 03/16/2011 Draft Measure 2.3 of 4: Percentage of Foreign Language and Area Studies (FLAS) master’s and doctoral graduates that studied critical need languages as defined by the Secretary of Education. (Desired direction: increase) 89a0bz Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2008 Set a Baseline 74 Target Met 2009 999 (March 2011) Pending 2010 999 (December 2011) Pending 2011 null75 Not Collected Pending 2012 75 (December 2013) Pending 2013 75 (March 2015) Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), Foreign Language and Area Studies (FLAS) Program, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. This is a new measure that focuses on critical need languages and will capture how well our programs respond to new and unanticipated language challenges. The numerator is the number of FLAS master's and doctoral graduates reporting a post- and pre-score for any of the critical need languages as defined by the Secretary of Education. The denominator is the total number of FLAS master's and doctoral graduates. FY 2008 data will be used to establish the baseline; and targets are expected to be set beginning in 2009. Measure 2.4 of 4: Percentage of Foreign Language and Area Studies (FLAS) participants who report that they found employment that utilizes their language and area skills. (Desired direction: increase) 89a0c0 Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2008 Set a Baseline Not Collected Not Collected 2009 999 Not Collected Not Collected 2010 999 Not Collected Not Collected Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), Foreign Language and Area Studies (FLAS) Program, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. This is a new measure that is intended to replace the former measure: percentage of employed Master's and doctoral degree graduates in fields of postsecondary education or government. The new measure captures FLAS participants utilizing their language and area skills without regard to employment sector. The numerator is the number of FLAS participants who report that they found employment that utilizes their language and area skills. The denominator is the number of FLAS participants who report that they found employment. FY 2008 data will be used to establish the baseline; and targets are expected to be set beginning in 2009. U.S. Department of Education 5 03/16/2011 Draft Objective 3 of 9: Centers for International Business Education (CIBE) provide funding to schools of business for curriculum development, research, and training on issues of importance to United States trade and competitiveness. Measure 3.1 of 3: Percent of graduates of a doctoral or Master's, including MBA, program with significant international business concentration at the postsecondary institution who are employed in business-related fields, including teaching at a business school. (Desired direction: increase) 89a02i Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2006 46 Measure not in place 2007 999 37 Did Not Meet Target 2008 999 41 Made Progress From Prior Year 2009 0 (March 2011) Pending 2011 null-999 Not Collected Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), Centers for International Business Education (CIBE) Program, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. This is a new measure, which includes doctoral and MBA graduates. FY 2006 data will set the baseline and will be available in March 2008. For FY 2007-2009, this measure is without targets. Measure 3.2 of 3: Efficiency measure: cost per Master's, including MBA, degree recipient or doctoral graduate employed in business-related fields, including teaching in a business school. (Desired direction: decrease) 89a02j Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2007 999 1,965 Did Not Meet Target 2008 999 1,844 Made Progress From Prior Year 2009 0 (December 2010) Pending 2011 null-999 Not Collected Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), Centers for International Business Education (CIBE) Program, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data Explanation. FY 2007 baseline data, $1,965, reflects an FY 2007 Appropriation of $10,650,000 divided by 5,421 Masters or Doctoral graduates employed in business-related fields, including teaching in a business school . Measure 3.3 of 3: Percentage of Centers for International Business Education projects judged to be successful by the program officer, based on a review of information provided in annual performance reports. (Desired direction: increase) 89a02k U.S. Department of Education 6 03/16/2011 Draft Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2007 999 100 Did Not Meet Target 2008 999 100 Did Not Meet Target 2009 0 (March 2011) Pending 2011 null-999 Not Collected Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), Centers for International Business Education (CIBE) Program, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. This is a new measure in FY 2007. FY 2007 data will set the baseline and will be available in March 2009. For FY 2007-2009, this measure is without targets. Objective 4 of 9: The International Research and Studies (IRS) Program supports surveys, studies, and instructional materials development to improve and strengthen instruction in modern foreign languages, area studies, and other international fields to provide full understanding of the places in which the foreign languages are commonly used. Measure 4.1 of 3: Efficiency measure: cost per high-quality, successfully-completed International Research and Studies project. (Desired direction: decrease) 2025 Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2006 Maintain a Baseline Not Collected Not Collected 2007 Maintain a Baseline 134,140 Pending 2008 999 128,308 Made Progress From Prior Year 2009 0 (March 2011) Pending 2010 130,000 (March 2012) Pending 2011 130,000 (March 2013) Pending 2012 130,000 (March 2014) Pending 2013 130,000 (March 2015) Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), International Research and Studies (IRS) Program, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. This measure is calculated as the appropriation for IRS (for FY 2007, $5,822,840 )divided by the number of IRS projects successfully completed (for FY 2007, 44). For FY 2008, the cost per successful outcome of 4129,200 was calculated by dividing the appropriation of $5,943,200 by the 46 successful projects.The program had no established targets for 2008 or 2009. U.S. Department of Education 7 03/16/2011 Draft Measure 4.2 of 3: Percentage of International Research and Studies Program projects judged to be successful by the program officer, based on a review of information provided in annual performance reports. (Desired direction: increase) 2023 Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2006 Maintain a Baseline Not Collected Not Collected 2007 Maintain a Baseline 100 Pending 2008 999 100 Did Not Meet Target 2009 0 (March 2011) Pending 2010 95 (March 2012) Pending 2011 95 (March 2013) Pending 2012 95 (March 2014) Pending 2013 95 (March 2015) Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), International Research and Studies (IRS) Program, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. For FY 2008-09, this measure is without a target. Measure 4.3 of 3: Number of outreach activities that are adopted or disseminated within a year, divided by the total number of IRS outreach activities conducted in the current reporting period. (Desired direction: increase) 2024 Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2006 Set a Baseline Not Collected Not Collected 2007 Maintain a Baseline 913 Pending 2008 999 86 Did Not Meet Target 2009 0 1,241 Target Exceeded 2011 null-999 Not Collected Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), International Research and Studies (IRS) Program, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. For FY 2008-09, this measure is without a target. Objective 5 of 9: Language Resource Centers (LRCs) provide grants for establishing, strengthening, and operating centers that serve as resources for improving the nation's capacity for teaching and learning foreign languages through teacher training, research, materials development, and dissemination projects. U.S. Department of Education 8 03/16/2011 Draft Measure 5.1 of 3: Number of outreach activities that are adopted or disseminated within a year, divided by the total number of LRC outreach activities conducted in the current reporting period. (Desired direction: increase) 89a02o Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2007 999 2,172 Target Exceeded 2008 999 3,690 Target Exceeded 2009 0 (March 2011) Pending 2011 null-999 Not Collected Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), Language Resource Centers (LRC) Program, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. This is a new measure. For FY 2007-2009, this measure is without targets. Measure 5.2 of 3: Percentage of Language Resource Centers projects judged to be successful by the program officer, based on a review of information provided in annual performance reports. (Desired direction: increase) 2027 Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2006 Maintain a Baseline Not Collected Not Collected 2007 Maintain a Baseline 100 Pending 2008 999 100 Did Not Meet Target 2009 0 (December 2011) Pending 2011 null95 Not Collected Pending 2012 95 (March 2014) Pending 2013 95 (March 2015) Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), Language Resource Centers Programs, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. For FY 2008-09, this measure is without a target. Measure 5.3 of 3: Efficiency measure: cost per high-quality, successfully-completed Language Resource Centers project. (Desired direction: decrease) 2029 Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2006 Maintain a Baseline Not Collected Not Collected 2007 Maintain a Baseline 322,941 Pending 2008 999 329,978 Did Not Meet Target 2009 0 (March 2011) Pending U.S. Department of Education 9 03/16/2011 Draft 2011 null325,000 Not Collected Pending 2012 325,000 (March 2014) Pending 2013 325,000 (March 2015) Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), Language Resource Centers Programs, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. This measure is calculated as the annual appropriation for LRC (for FY 2007, $4,844,116) divided by the number of LRC projects successfully completed (for FY 2007, 12). . For FY 2008-09, this measure is without a target. Objective 6 of 9: The Undergraduate International Studies and Foreign Language (UISFL) program provides funds to institutions of higher education, a combination of such institutions, or partnerships between nonprofit educational organizations and institutions of higher education to plan, develop, and carry out programs to strengthen and improve undergraduate instruction in international studies and foreign languages. Measure 6.1 of 3: Percentage of Undergraduate International Studies and Foreign Language Program projects judged to be successful by the program officer, based on a review of information provided in annual performance reports. (Desired direction: increase) 2031 Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2006 Maintain a Baseline Not Collected Not Collected 2007 Maintain a Baseline 100 Pending 2008 999 100 Did Not Meet Target 2009 0 (March 2011) Pending 2010 95 (March 2012) Pending 2011 95 (March 2013) Pending 2012 95 (March 2014) Pending 2013 95 (March 2015) Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), Undergraduate International Studies and Foreign Language (UISFL) Program, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. For FY 2008-09, this measure is without a target. Measure 6.2 of 3: Percentage of critical languages addressed/covered by foreign language major, minor, or certificate programs created or enhanced; or by language courses created or enhanced; or by faculty or instructor positions created with Undergraduate International Studies and Foreign Language or matching funds in the reporting period. (Desired direction: increase) 2032 U.S. Department of Education 10 03/16/2011 Draft Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2006 BL+1 Not Collected Not Collected 2007 BL+2 19 Target Exceeded 2008 999 17 Did Not Meet Target 2009 0 (March 2011) Pending 2011 null18 Not Collected Pending 2012 18 (March 2014) Pending 2013 18 (March 2015) Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), Undergraduate International Studies and Foreign Language (UISFL) Program, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. For FY 2008-09, this measure is without a target. Measure 6.3 of 3: Efficiency measure: cost per high-quality, successfully-completed Undergraduate International Studies and Foreign Language project. (Desired direction: decrease) 2033 Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2006 Maintain a Baseline Not Collected Not Collected 2007 Maintain a Baseline 97,609 Pending 2008 999 77,414 Made Progress From Prior Year 2009 0 (March 2011) Pending 2010 80,000 (March 2012) Pending 2011 80,000 (March 2013) Pending 2012 80,000 (March 2014) Pending 2013 80,000 (March 2015) Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), Undergraduate International Studies and Foreign Language (UISFL) Program, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. This measure is calculated as the appropriation for UISFL, (for FY 2007, $4,300,000) divided by the number of projects successfully completed (for FY 2007, 46). For FY 2008, the cost per successful outcome of $75,367 was calculated by dividing the appropriation of $4,295,914 by the 57 successful projects. For FY 2008-09, this measure is without a target. U.S. Department of Education 11 03/16/2011 Draft Objective 7 of 9: The Business and International Education (BIE) Program provides funds to institutions of higher education that enter into an agreement with a trade association and/or business for two purposes: to improve the academic teaching of the business curriculum and to conduct outreach activities that expand the capacity of the business community to engage in international economic activities. Measure 7.1 of 3: Percentage of Business and International Education Program projects judged to be successful by the program officer, based on a review of information provided in annual performance reports. (Desired direction: increase) 2035 Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2006 Maintain a Baseline Not Collected Not Collected 2007 Maintain a Baseline 98 Pending 2008 999 100 Made Progress From Prior Year 2009 0 (March 2011) Pending 2010 95 (March 2012) Pending 2011 95 (March 2013) Pending 2012 95 (March 2014) Pending 2013 95 (March 2015) Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), Business and International Education Program, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. FY 2005 data will be used as the baseline and will be available in December 2006. For FY 2008-09, this measure is without a target. Measure 7.2 of 3: Number of outreach activities that are adopted or disseminated within a year, divided by the total number of BIE outreach activities conducted in the current reporting period. (Desired direction: increase) 2036 Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2006 Maintain a Baseline Not Collected Not Collected 2007 Maintain a Baseline 38.7 Pending 2008 999 54 Made Progress From Prior Year 2009 0 (March 2011) Pending 2011 null-999 Not Collected Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), Business and International Education Program, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. The calculation is the number of outreach activities that result in adoption or further dissemination within a year, divided by the total number of BIE participant project-related U.S. Department of Education 12 03/16/2011 Draft outreach activities during the current year. FY 2005 data will be used to establish a baseline and will be available in March 2007. The calculation is the number of outreach activities that result in adoption or further dissemination within a year, divided by the total number of BIE participant project-related outreach activities during the current year. For FY 2008-09, this measure is without a target. Measure 7.3 of 3: Efficiency measure: cost per high-quality, successfully-completed Business and International Education project. (Desired direction: decrease) 2037 Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2006 Maintain a Baseline Not Collected Not Collected 2007 Maintain a Baseline 99,800 Pending 2008 999 102,068 Did Not Meet Target 2009 0 (March 2011) Pending 2010 100,000 (March 2012) Pending 2011 100,000 (March 2013) Pending 2012 100,000 (March 2014) Pending 2013 100,000 (March 2015) Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), Business and International Education Program, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. The calculation is the annual appropriation for the BIE program (for FY 2007, $4,340,500) divided by the number of BIE projects successfully completed (for Fy 2007, 42). For FY 2008, the cost per successful outcome of $99,790, was calculated by dividing the appropriation $4191,200 by 42 successful projects. For FY 2008-09, this measure is without a target. Objective 8 of 9: The Technological Innovation and Cooperation for Foreign Information Access (TICFIA) Program supports projects that will develop innovative techniques or programs using new electronic technologies to collect information from foreign sources. Grants are made to access, collect, organize, preserve, and widely disseminate information on world regions and countries other than the United States that address our nation's teaching and research needs in international education and foreign languages. Measure 8.1 of 2: Percentage of Technological Innovation and Cooperation for Foreign Information Access Program projects judged to be successful by the program officer, based on a review of information provided in annual performance reports. (Desired direction: increase) 2039 Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2006 Maintain a Baseline 100 Pending 2007 Maintain a Baseline 100 Target Met U.S. Department of Education 13 03/16/2011 Draft 2008 999 (March 2011) Pending 2009 0 (March 2012) Pending 2011 null-999 Not Collected Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), Technological Innovation and Cooperation for Foreign Information Access (TICFIA) Program, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. For FY 2008-09, this measure is without a target. Measure 8.2 of 2: Efficiency measure: cost per high-quality, successfully- completed Technological Innovation and Cooperation for Foreign Information Access project. (Desired direction: decrease) 2041 Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2006 Maintain a Baseline Not Collected Pending 2007 Maintain a Baseline 188,889 Pending 2008 999 Not Collected Not Collected 2009 0 162,167 Did Not Meet Target 2011 null-999 Not Collected Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), Technological Innovation and Cooperation for Foreign Information Access (TICFIA) Program, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. The calculation is the annual appropriation for the TICFIA program (for FY 2007, $1,700,000) divided by the number of TICFIA projects successfully completed (for FY 2007, 10). For FY 2008-09, this measure is without a target. Objective 9 of 9: The American Overseas Research Centers (AORCs) provides grants to consortia United States institutions of higher education to establish or operate overseas research centers that promote postgraduate research, exchanges, and area studies. Measure 9.1 of 3: Percentage of American Overseas Research Centers projects judged to be successful by the program officer, based on a review of information provided in annual performance reports. (Desired direction: increase) 2043 Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2006 Maintain a Baseline 100 Pending 2007 Maintain a Baseline 100 Target Met 2008 999 100 Did Not Meet Target 2009 0 (March 2011) Pending 2011 null95 Not Collected Pending U.S. Department of Education 14 03/16/2011 Draft 2012 95 (March 2014) Pending 2013 95 (March 2015) Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), American Overseas Research Centers, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. For FY 2008-09, this measure is without a target. Measure 9.2 of 3: Percentage of scholars who indicated they were "highly satisfied" with the services the Center provided. (Desired direction: increase) 2044 Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2006 Maintain a Baseline Not Collected Not Collected 2007 Maintain a Baseline 89 Pending 2008 999 90 Made Progress From Prior Year 2009 0 (March 2011) Pending 2011 null90 Not Collected Pending 2012 90 (March 2014) Pending 2013 90 (March 2015) Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), American Overseas Research Centers, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. For FY 2008-09, this measure is without a target. Measure 9.3 of 3: Efficiency measure: cost per high-quality, successfully-completed American Overseas Research Centers project. (Desired direction: decrease) 2045 Actual Year Target Status (or date expected) 2006 Maintain a Baseline Not Collected Not Collected 2007 Maintain a Baseline 108,829 Pending 2008 999 108,829 Did Not Meet Target 2009 0 (March 2011) Pending 2011 null108,000 Not Collected Pending 2012 108,000 (March 2014) Pending 2013 108,000 (March 2015) Pending Source. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, International Resource Information System (IRIS), American Overseas Research Centers, annual and final reports. Frequency of Data Collection: Annual U.S. Department of Education 15 03/16/2011 Draft Data Quality. Data are supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Explanation. The calculation is the annual appropriation for the AORCs (for FY 2007, $1,000,000) divided by the number of visiting scholars served by the research centers (for FY 2007, 9). For FY 2008-09, this measure is without a target. U.S. Department of Education 16 03/16/2011 Draft