下载

1下载券

加入VIP
  • 专属下载特权
  • 现金文档折扣购买
  • VIP免费专区
  • 千万文档免费下载

上传资料

关闭

关闭

关闭

封号提示

内容

首页 《当代中国哲学研究(1949-2009)》英文版

《当代中国哲学研究(1949-2009)》英文版.pdf

《当代中国哲学研究(1949-2009)》英文版

chhistorian
2018-10-03 0人阅读 举报 0 0 暂无简介

简介:本文档为《《当代中国哲学研究(1949-2009)》英文版pdf》,可适用于人文社科领域

StudiesonContemporaryChinesePhilosophy(ndash)ThetitlespublishedinthisseriesarelistedatbrillcommcpModernChinesePhilosophyEditedbyJohnMakeham(LaTrobeUniversity)VOLUMEStudiesonContemporaryChinesePhilosophy(ndash)ByGuoQiyongTranslatedbyPaulJDrsquoAmbrosio,RobertCarleoIII,JoannaGuzowska,ChadMeyers,MartynaŚwiątczaketalLEIDEN|BOSTONThisbookisaresultofthetranslationlicenseagreementbetweenChinaSocialSciencesPressandKoninklijkeBrillNVThisbookistranslatedintoEnglishfromtheoriginalljᖃԓѝഭଢᆖ⹄ウ(ndash)NJ(DangdaiZhongguozhexueyanjiundash)withfinancialsupportfromtheChineseFundfortheHumanitiesandSocialSciences(ᵜҖ㧧ѝॾ⽮Պ、ᆖส䠁䍴ࣙ)LibraryofCongressCataloginginPublicationDataNames:Guo,Qiyong,ndashauthor|DrsquoAmbrosio,PaulJ,translatorTitle:StudiesoncontemporaryChinesephilosophy(ndash)byGuoQiyongemsptranslatedbyPaulJDrsquoAmbrosio,RobertCarleoIII,JoannaGuzowska,emspChadMeyers,MartynaŚwiątczakDescription:LeidenBoston:Brill,|Series:ModernChineseemspphilosophy,ISSNvolumeIdentifiers:LCCN(print)|LCCN(ebook)|ISBNemsp(Ebook)|ISBN(hardback:alkpaper)Subjects:LCSH:Philosophy,Chinesemdashthcentury|Philosophy,emspChinesemdashstcenturyClassification:LCCB(ebook)|LCCBG(print)|DDCemspmdashdcLCrecordavailableathttps:lccnlocgovTypefacefortheLatin,Greek,andCyrillicscripts:ldquoBrillrdquoSeeanddownload:brillcombrilltypefaceissnisbn(hardback)isbn(ebook)CopyrightbyKoninklijkeBrillNV,Leiden,TheNetherlandsKoninklijkeBrillNVincorporatestheimprintsBrill,BrillHesDeGraaf,BrillNijhoff,BrillRodopi,BrillSenseandHoteiPublishingAllrightsreservedNopartofthispublicationmaybereproduced,translated,storedinaretrievalsystem,ortransmittedinanyformorbyanymeans,electronic,mechanical,photocopying,recordingorotherwise,withoutpriorwrittenpermissionfromthepublisherAuthorizationtophotocopyitemsforinternalorpersonaluseisgrantedbyKoninklijkeBrillNVprovidedthattheappropriatefeesarepaiddirectlytoTheCopyrightClearanceCenter,RosewoodDrive,Suite,Danvers,MA,USAFeesaresubjecttochangeThisbookisprintedonacidfreepaperandproducedinasustainablemannerContentsTranslatorrsquosIntroductionemspixIntroduction:LookingBackandReflectingonSixtyYearsofResearchonChinesePhilosophyemspTranslatedbyChadMeyersTwoBigStagesandFiveSmallStagesemspTheEightBigFieldsthatHaveBeenPopularintheLastThirtyYearsemspTheFusionofEastandWestandtheEstablishmentofChinesePhilosophyasaDisciplineintheEarlyTwentiethCenturyemspTranslatedbyYuanAiWangGuowei,LiangQichao,andChinesePhilosophyasaDisciplineemspTheParadigmofHuShiandFengYoulanmdashUndertheInfluenceofAngloAmericanPhilosophyemspTheParadigmsofGuoMoruoandHouWailumdashUndertheInfluenceofMarxismemspTheEarlyAchievementsinResearchonChinesePhilosophy(ndash)emspTranslatedbyChadMeyersChinesePhilosophyundertheDirectionofMarxismemspChinesePhilosophyrsquosParadigmoftheldquoTwoPairsrdquoandtheCorrespondingDebateemspTheInitialAcademicAchievementsofResearchinChinesePhilosophyemspTransformationsofResearchinChinesePhilosophy(ndash)emspTranslatedbyDanSarafinasLiberationinThoughtandtheShiftingResearchParadigmemspHistoricalResearchandResearchinPhilosophicalCategoriesemspSubjectivityofChinesePhilosophyandParadigmReconstructionemspviContentsResearchonPreQinPhilosophyemspTranslatedbyCMMorrowConfucianismemspDaoismemspMohismemspTheLogicians,Legalists,andMilitaryStrategistsemspPhilosophicalResearchontheQinHanandSuiTangPeriodsemspTranslatedbyDimitraAmarantidouPhilosophicalThoughtintheQinHanemspWeiJinXuanxueemspTheCollationofClassicalBuddhistTextsandtheHistoryofChineseBuddhismemspMajorBuddhistSchoolsemspTheCollationofDaoistTextsandtheHistoryofChineseDaoismemspDaoistSchoolsemspSuiTangConfucianismandSchoolofConfucianClassicsemspResearchonSongMingNeoConfucianismemspTranslatedbyChadMeyersandJoannaGuzowskaChengZhuNeoConfucianismemspTheLuWangSchoolofMindemspTheQiTraditionandEarlyEnlightenmentemspStudiesinEarlyModernandModernChinesePhilosophyemspTranslatedbyJoannaGuzowskaResearchinEarlyModernPhilosophyemspTheSinicizationofMarxistPhilosophyemspModernNewConfucianismemspLiberalismemspContemporaryScholarshiponChineseClassicsemspTranslatedbyMartynaŚwiątczakClassicsandtheStudyofClassicsastheFoundationofChineseCultureemspTheStudyoftheZhouYiandItsCommentariessincethesemspOverviewoftheScholarshiponShiandShuinRecentYearsemspviiContentsAStudyofMinoritiesPhilosophyemspTranslatedbySharonSmallTheRiseandControversyofldquoMinoritiesPhilosophyrdquoemspSpecificResearchemspAComprehensiveHistoryofandMonographonthePhilosophyofAllEthnicGroupsemspTrendsemspStudiesonAncientPhilosophyofNatureandthePhilosophyofScienceandTechnologyemspTranslatedbyPaulJDrsquoAmbrosioAncientPhilosophyofNatureandItsCharacteristicsemspPhilosophicalThinkinginAncientScienceandTechnologyemspOntheRelationshipbetweenAncientPhilosophyandScienceandTechnologyemspAncientPhilosophyofNatureandtheResearchMethodofthePhilosophyofScienceandTechnologyemspStudiesinClassicalLogicandEpistemologyemspTranslatedbyJoannaGuzowskaResearchintheHistoryofChineseLogicemspProblemsinResearchonChineseLogicemspMajorDevelopmentsintheStudyofClassicalEpistemologyemspResearchParadigmsintheStudyofChineseLogicandClassicalEpistemologyemspStudiesonAncientSocialandPoliticalPhilosophyemspTranslatedbyMartynaŚwiątczakThreeStagesofStudiesonAncientPoliticalPhilosophyemspContemporaryResearchonAncientPoliticalPhilosophyemspSpecificTopicsofScholarshiponAncientPoliticalPhilosophyinRecentYearsemspTheMethodologicalReflectionandProspectsofScholarshiponAncientPoliticalPhilosophyemspSociety,Religion,Ethics,andRitesinAncientChinaemspviiiContentsExcavatedBambooandSilkTextsinScholarshipontheHistoryofChinesePhilosophyemspTranslatedbyRobertCarleoIIIRelevantExcavatedTextsoftheLastSixDecadesemspExcavatedTextsandScholarshiponClassicsandMastersLiteratureemspAfterwordemspGuoQiyong䜝喀ࣷGlossaryofHistoricalTextsemspGlossaryofPersonalNamesemspTranslatorrsquosIntroductionGuoQiyong䜝喀ࣷ,whospecializesinthehistoryofConfucianismandtwentiethcenturyChinesethought,servesasprofessorofphilosophyandclassics,andasthedeanoftheSchoolofChineseClassicsinChinarsquosprestigiousWuhanUniversityHehasauthoredmorethantenbooks,servedaseditororcoeditorforovertwentyvolumes,andpublishedalmostonehundredacademicarticlesTheseworksarewidelyrecognizedasextremelyinfluentialacademiccontributionsincontemporaryChina,earningGuoareputationasoneofthemostimportantlivingscholarsinChinatodayStudiesonContemporaryChinesePhilosophyisanextremelyusefulresourceforanyoneworkingonmodernChinesephilosophyItdetailsmajorworksandtheircontributionsbetweenandThetranslationofthistextwascommissionedbytheChinaSocialSciencesPressandorganizedbyhellip,whowasrecommendedbyBrillPublishersAsmallteamoftranslatorscametogethertocompletetheprojectThechaptersweretranslatedseparatelythetranslatorrsquosnameisindicatedinafootnoteatthebeginningofeachchapterThetranslatorsare:YuanAi㺱㢮isaDPhilstudentatQueenrsquosCollege,OxfordUniversity,specializinginChinesephilosophyYuanisdeeplyinterestedinDaoism,andfrequentlyuseseitherananalyticoranAsianstudiesapproachinherresearchDimitraAmarantidouisaPhDcandidateinChinesePhilosophyatEastChinaNormalUniversity(ECNU)inShanghaiSheiscurrentlytranslatingYangGuorongrsquosTwentyEssaysonChinesePhilosophyandhascollaboratedonothertranslationsaswellRobertACarleoIIIisfromBoston,MAHeholdsanMPhilfromFudanUniversityandiscurrentlyaPhDcandidateattheChineseUniversityofHongKongHehastranslatedtheworkofseveralleadingcontemporaryChinesephilosophers,includingLiZehou,ChenLai,andYangGuorongPaulJDrsquoAmbrosioisanAssistantProfessorofChinesePhilosophyatEastChinaNormalUniversity,wherehealsoservesastheDeanoftheInterculturalCenterforLearningandTranslation,asaFellowoftheInstituteofModernChineseThought,andastheProgramDirectorforECNUrsquosEnglishlanguageMAandPhDprogramsHehaspublishedovertwentyarticles,isthecoeditor(withMichaelSandel)ofMichaelSandelandChinesePhilosophy,coauthor(withHansGeorgMoeller)ofGenuinePretending,andhastranslatedtheworkofmanyleadingChinesephilosophers,includingFengQi,ChenGuying,LiZehou,ChenLai,andYangGuorongxTranslatorrsquosIntroductionJoannaGuzowskaisaPhDcandidateatWarsawUniversityinPoland,wheresheiscompletingadissertationonKantandtheZhuangziShehaspublishednumerousarticlesandbeeninvolvedwithseveraltranslationprojectsChadMeyersholdsaPhDinChinesephilosophyfromEastChinaNormalUniversity,wherehealsodidhismastersdegreeHeiscurrentlylivinginOhio,workingasafreelancetranslator,andhasbeeninvolvedwithnumeroustranslationprojects,includingofworksbyChenLaiandYangGuorongCarmineMorrowisagraduatestudentofComparativeLiteratureattheUniversityofCalifornia,DavisHeholdsanMAinChinesePhilosophyfromFudanUniversityinShanghaiDanielSarafinas(অа⌒)isfromPembroke,MAHeholdsaBAPhilfromLoyolaMarymountUniversity,anMPhilfromZhongnanUniversity,andiscurrentlyaPhDcandidateattheUniversityofMacauHeisworkingontheconnectionsbetweencultureandphilosophy,particularlyastheyrelateinearlyChinesethought,andhasservedontranslationteamsworkingontextsbyLiZehouandYangGuorongSharonSmallwasbornandraisedinCaliforniaandlatermovedtoIsraelSheisfluentinEnglish,Hebrew,andMandarinChinese,andproficientinFrenchandclassicalChineseWhileattendingTelAvivUniversityinIsrael,shedevelopedadeepinterestinancientChinesephilosophy,particularlyearlyDaoismSince,SharonhaslivedinChinain,sheobtainedtheConfuciusInstituteNewSinologyFellowshiptopursueherPhDatPekingUniversityinearlyDaoistthought,inlightofrecentlyexcavatedmanuscriptsMartynaŚwiątczakBorowystudiedPhilosophy,Politics,andSinologyatWarsawUniversityinPolandSheiscurrentlyagraduatestudentatFudanUniversity,studyingChinesePhilosophyAschieftranslatorofthisproject,IwouldlikementionafewissuesconcerningthetranslationFirst,thecontentsofeachchapterwaswrittenbyadifferentauthor(andprobablyseveralstudents)ThedetailsofwhowroteeachsectioncanbefoundintheAfterwordSecond,intheoriginalChinese,thestyle,format,andterminologyvariesthroughoutthebookmdashfromchaptertochapterandsometimeswithinasinglechapterGenerally,weworkedtoestablishconsistenciesthatdonotalwaysappearintheoriginal,especiallyforthesakeofformattingandwhereterminologicaldiscrepanciesoccur,buteachchapterremainssomewhatindependentintermsofstyleThird,barringcertainkeytermssuchasdao䚃,li⽬,orrenӱ,wedonotattempttodowordforwordtranslationsIndeed,theremaybesignificantvariancesinhowatermistranslated,accordingtothecontext,impliedconnotation,andwithconcernforEnglishfluencyFinally,therearesomeobscureancienttextsthatdonothaveagreedupon(insomecases,any)EnglishtitlesGlosseshavebeenaddedxiTranslatorrsquosIntroductionforthesetitleseitherbythechaptertranslatorormyself,buttheglossesmerelyhintatthecontextofthesetexts,andarenotmeanttobetranslationsoftheactualtitleIalsowishtoexpressmygratitudetoeachofthetranslatorsfortheirexcellentwork,toVickiLowforeditingtheentiremanuscript,aswellasQinHigleyandVictoriaMensonfromBrillfortheirpatienceandunderstandingthroughoutthisalmostthreeyearprocessPaulJDrsquoAmbrosioMinhang,ChinaAprilcopykoninklijkebrillnv,leiden,ensp|enspdoiIntroductionLookingBackandReflectingonSixtyYearsofResearchonChinesePhilosophyTranslatedbyChadMeyersFirst,wewanttodefineldquoChinesephilosophyrdquoAccordingtothebranchesofstudy,whatinthepastwascalledldquothehistoryofChinesephilosophyrdquoisnowcalledldquoChinesephilosophyrdquoHowever,usingthetermldquoChinesephilosophyrdquoeasilyleadstoamisconceivedreferencetothewholefieldorprimarybranchofphilosophyinChinaInthisbookldquoChinesephilosophyrdquoisgenerallyequivalenttowhatisknowntodayasldquoChinesephilosophyrdquoofthesocalledsecondarybranch,thatis,ldquothehistoryofChinesephilosophyrdquoButthisisnottheendofthematterWhatwehavetoexplainisthatanalyzingldquoChinesephilosophyrdquosolelyintermsofknowingandunderstandingisnotenoughldquoChinesephilosophyrdquopossessesatleasttwolevels:thefirstlevelisldquoChinesephilosophyrdquoasaworldofmeaningThislevelconnotesastateofmindandtheidealoftheultimatemeaningofhumanlife,andparticularlythefundamental,whethergeneralorparticular,spiritualbeliefsorcorevaluesofChinesecivilizationmdashlikeldquotheboundaryofinterrelationofNatureandhumanbeings,rdquoldquothesourceofthenaturalorderofhumanlife,rdquodao䚃orldquoDaordquoandli⨶orldquoLi,rdquomdashwhichconstitutethelivingandfluidlytransforminglevelthatstillplaysapositiveroleinsecuringawayoflifeintodayrsquosworldandinthecollectivelifeoftheChinesepeopleOnlythesecondlevelistheacademiclevelofldquoChinesephilosophyrdquoasabodyofknowledgethatisbuiltupasabranchofstudyHerewefindwhatcouldbedivided,classified,andseparatelytakenintoacademicresearchOnthislevelldquoChinesephilosophyrdquocanbecognitivelyturnedintothecontentofcomparisonwithforeignphilosophyandtakentobetheequivalentenspTranslatorrsquosnote:Thetermdaocanbetranslatedasldquoway,rdquoldquopath,rdquoorldquodiscourserdquoItiscentraltoChinesephilosophicalthought,andcanoftenbeunderstoodastheldquowayrdquoofthecosmos,orinGuorsquosworkasldquothewayofnature,rdquowhich,ifgoneagainst,willonlycauseunproductivefrictionenspTranslatorrsquosnote:Thetermlicanbetranslatedasldquoprinciple,rdquoldquopattern,rdquoorldquocoherencerdquoItisanothertermcentraltoChinesephilosophicalthought,butonethathasvariousconnotationsthatdevelopovertimeandvaryfromtexttotext,authortoauthorIntroductionoftheldquoChinesephilosophyrdquothatforeignsinologiststakeastheobjectoftheirresearchThereare,however,somedifferencesbetweenldquoChinesephilosophyrdquoonthislevelandforeignsinologySecond,inthisbookwestressthethreeldquothirtyyearsrdquoconceptIndiscussingtherecentsixtyyearsofdevelopmentofacademichistory,thethirtyandfortyyearsrunningpriortothisareunavoidableIfwetakemorethanacenturyorsoasawhole,thenthehistorymadebythescholasticparadigmofChinesehumanitiesorsocialscienceevenmorestronglyillustratesthewholeimageofcontemporaryacademichistoryOfcourse,ourdiscussionofproblemsalwaysincludespointsofemphasis,andinthisworktheemphasisisonthelastsixtyyearssinceOctoberWecannot,however,forgetthatweneedtoframethisagainstthebackgroundofthethirtyyearsprecedingthisperiod,namelytheacademichistoryofthebeginningofthePeoplersquosRepublicuptoIndiscussingthelastsixtyyearsofacademicdevelopmentofthemainlandregionofChina,thepointofemphasisis,ofcourse,thethirtyyearsafterreformingandopeningupButthefirstthirtyyearsofthisperiod,namelyacademichistoryfromto,isbynomeansinsignificantTherearemanyreasonswhytheproblemsinthefollowingthirtyyearscouldstimulatedeepdiscussionandobtainacademicvalue,andpartoftheproblematicthemesamongthemstemmedfromreflectionsonthethirtyyearspriortoreformingandopeningupTheachievementsofthepriorthirtyyearsofresearchwerenotallvacantoftruthSincethemodernage,theincreasingtediousnessofthedivisionoflaborinacademiahasgreatlystrengthenedtheselfawarenessofindividuatedbranchesofstudymanyhavebegunassertingtheirownindependentagency,andtheirownobjectsofareasandmethodshavebeenmoreprofoundlydiscussedThedistinctionanddifferencesamongthehistoryofChinesephilosophy,thehistoryofChineseacademiclearning,andthehistoryofChinesethoughthavebeguntocatchtheattentionofscholarlydiscussionanddebateGenerallyspeaking,researchinthehistoryofphilosophyiscenteredonthediscussionofmetaphysics,cosmology,life,values,philosophicalproblems,andmethodsenspThehistoryofChineseacademiclearninggenerallystudiestheancientacademicschoolsofChina,whichisinseparablefromthehistoryofChinesethoughtAmongthemanyvolumesandworksofrecentperiodsontheissueofthehistoryofChineseacademiclearning:ZhangQizhiᕐኲѻandLiuXuezhiࡈᆖᘇ,ZhongguoXueshuSixiangBiannianѝഭᆖᵟᙍᜣ㕆ᒤAnnalsofChineseAcademicThought,volumes(Xirsquoan:ShaanxiNormalUniversityPress,)YinJizuoቩ㔗րandZhouShanઘኡ,ZhongguoXueshuSichaoShiѝഭᆖᵟᙍ▞ਢAHistoryofChineseTrendsofAcademicThoughtvolumes(Shanghai:ShanghaiAcademyofSocialSciencesPress,)IntroductionItthentendstoanalyzetheinternallogicandpressingdifficultiesofdifferentphilosophicalsystemsandtheevolutionanddevelopmentofphilosophicaltheoriesButresearchinthehistoryofthoughtfocusesmuchmoreontheinteractionbetweenideasandsocialhistoricalfactorslikepolitics,economics,andculture,theinfluenceofspecifichistoricalconditionsupontheformationofsomethought,andhowthesethoughtsinfluencesocialrealitymdashmoresimplyput,theldquohistoricalmeaningofthetransformationofthoughtrdquoButwhatmustbenoticedisthelastyearsofresearchinthehistoryofChinesephilosophyisthatitisalwaysinextricablyintertwinedwithresearchinthehistoryofChinesethoughtLiangQichaoằ੟䎵,CaiShangsi㭑ቊᙍandthegeneralscholarlyworldoftheshaveevenprofessionallydiscussedtheproblemoftherelationshipbetweenthehistoryofphilosophyandthehistoryofthoughtHowever,thisproblemhasnotbeenfundamentallyresolvedInaddition,theboundarybetweenthehistoryofChinesephilosophyandthehistoryofChinesethoughtisblurredBasedonthisfact,takingtheldquohistoryofChinesephilosophyandthoughtrdquoasthetopicofdiscussionseemstomorefullyreflectthedevelopmentalevolutionofthelastsixtyyearsofresearchinthehistoryofChinesephilosophyInanotherrespect,manyscholarswhohavebeeninfluencedbysuchtrendsofthoughtasmodernhermeneuticsemphasizetheautonomousnatureofthestudyofthehistoryofChinesephilosophyaswellastheclosebondbetweentheraisingandansweringofphilosophicalproblemsandthecontextofhistoryandculture,andsoholdtounfoldingthecombinedresearchofthehistoryofChinesephilosophyinawaythatintegratesthehistoryofphilosophyandthehistoryofthoughtOfcourse,theauthorsofthisbookengagesintheenterpriseofphilosophyandfocusheavilyonthecontentofphilosophyanditsresearchThecontentofphilosophystronglyreflectsthespiritoftheage,andphilosophicalwisdomiscapableofembodyingthesingularnatureofapeopleTwoBigStagesandFiveSmallStagesThebranchofstudy(ofthehistory)ofChinesephilosophywasestablishedatthebeginningofthetwentiethcenturyTheforerunnersofthisbranchofstudyenspHuangJunjie哴׺ᶠ,ShixueFangfaLuncongਢᆖᯩ⌅䇪ыCollectionofMethodologiesofHistory,rdedition(Taipei:TaiwanAcademicPress,),enspZhengZongyi䜁ᇇѹ,MingqingRuxueZhuanxingTanxi᰾␵݂ᆖ䖜ර᧒᷀AnalysisoftheParadigmShiftofConfucianismfromtheMingtoQingDynasties(HongKong:ChineseHongKongUniversityPress,),editedversion,prefaceIntroductionwereChenFuchen䱸唫ᇨ,ChenHanzhang䱸≹ㄐ,MaXulun傜ਉՖandXieWuliang䉒ᰐ䟿ThefoundersofthisbranchofstudywereWangGuowei⦻ഭ㔤,LiangQichaoandCaiYuanpei㭑ݳษ,andespeciallythosewhowereinfluencedbytheUnitedKingdomandtheUnitedStates,likeHuShi㜑䘲andFengYoulanߟ৻ޠThosewhoparticipatedinthisbranchofstudyalsoincludeZhongTai䫏⌠TheguidingstarintheprocessofinitingthestudyofthehistoryofChinesephilosophywasFengYoulanrsquostwovolumeZhongguoZhexueShiѝഭଢᆖਢAHistoryofChinesePhilosophy,publishedbytheCommercialPressinAdditionally,FengYoulanrsquosXinYuanDaoᯠⓀ䚃ANewTreatiseontheNatureofDao,publishedattheendofthewarofresistanceagainstJapan,wasanextensionofthistradition,andwascomparativelymoredevelopedandmoreChinesethanthepreviousworkFromtheendofthestotheeveofthefoundingofthenewChina,theworksofTangYongtong⊔⭘ᖔandZhangDainianᕐዡᒤarehardtoignoreInotherrespect,anothersetofclassicsincludestheseriesofcreativeworksaboutChinesephilosophyandthoughtthatwerewrittenbyMarxisthistoriansofthoughtwhowereguidedbythetheoryofhisto

用户评价(0)

关闭

新课改视野下建构高中语文教学实验成果报告(32KB)

抱歉,积分不足下载失败,请稍后再试!

提示

试读已结束,如需要继续阅读或者下载,敬请购买!

文档小程序码

使用微信“扫一扫”扫码寻找文档

1

打开微信

2

扫描小程序码

3

发布寻找信息

4

等待寻找结果

我知道了
评分:

/624

《当代中国哲学研究(1949-2009)》英文版

VIP

在线
客服

免费
邮箱

爱问共享资料服务号

扫描关注领取更多福利