COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Copyright Regulations 1969
WARNING
This material has been reproduced and communicated to
you by or on behalf of Swinburne University of Technology
pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (the Act).
The material in this communication may be subject to
copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or
communication of this material by you may be the subject of
copyright protection under the Act.
Do not remove this notice.
Ninety-five percent of t he world's designers focus all of
their efforts on developing products and services
exclusively for the richest ten percent of the world's
customers . Nothing less than a revolution in design is
needed to reach the other ninety percent.
Transport enginee rs work hard to create elegant shapes for
modern cars while the majority of people in the world can
only dream about buying a used bicycle. As deSigners make
products ever more stylish, efficient, and durable, their
products' prices go up, but people with money are both able
and wi lling to pay. In contrast, the poor in developing coun
tries-who outnumber their rich counterparts by twenty to
one-have only pennies to spend on hundreds of critical
necessities. They are ready and willing to make any reason
able compromise in quality for the sake of affordability, but
again and again, nothing is available in the marketplace
that meets their needs.
The fact that the work of most modern designers has
almost no impact on most of the people in the world is not
lost on those entering the field. Bernard Amadei, an engi
neering professor at the Univers ity of Colorado in Boulder,
tells me that engineering students all over the United
States are flocking to take advantage of opportunities
made available by organizations like Engineers Without
Borders to work on problems such as designing and build
ing affordable rural water-supply systems in poor coun
tries. If students can make meaningful contributions in
designing specifically for
6. A micro-sprinkler in use on poor customers, why do
a small-plot farm in Nepal. designers continue to
Ignore thiS area? Is It because It IS much more dlfflcul[ PAUL POLAK
than designing products for rich customers? I s It because
they perceive that [here IS no money w be made? I do
not agree.
HOW COMPLICATED IS IT TO DESIGN FOR THE PDORP
You do not need a degree in engineering or architecture to
learn how to talk and listen to poor people as customers. I
have been doing it for more than twenty years. The things
they need are so simple and so obvious, it is relatively easy
to come up w ith new income-generating products that
they are happy to pay for . But they have to be affordable.
Twenty-three years ago, in Somalia, International
Development Enterprises (IDE), the organization,
I founded, undertook its first prOject by helping refugee
blacksmiths build and sellsoo donkey carts to their fellow
refugees. However, in Somalia, there are a lot of thorns in
the dirt roads they traveled on, and nowhere a donkey-cart
owner could buy tools to fix flat tires. So I went to Nairobi,
Kenya, and bought tube patch kits and lug wrenches.
I bought quite a number of good-quality, British-made
wrenches that carried a virtual lifetime guarantee for $12
each, as well as a few $6 Chinese-made models that would
be lucky to last six months. I offered both types of lug
wrenches for sale to donkey-cart owners at cost plus
transportation .
To my amazement, the Chinese lug w renches sold like
hotcakes while I failed to sell a single British model. How
could this be? After talking to a lot ofdon key-cart owners, I
finally realized an operator could generate enough income
in one month to buy ten British-made lug wrenches, but if
19
he did not have the money to buy a lug wrench today to fix a
flat tire, hewould earn nothing and might end up losing his
donkey cart. So he bought the w rench he could afford today
to stay in business and earn more money for tomorrow. I
have heard the same story repeated over and over by the
poor people I've talked to. For the 2.7 billion people in the
world who earn less than $2 a day, affordability rules.
THE RUTHLESS PURSUIT OF AFFOROABILlTY
Vince Lombardi, the famous coach of the Green Bay
Packers, often said to his football players, "Winning isn 't
everything; it's the only thing."With one wo rd change, the
same sentiment applies to the process of designing
products to serve poor customers: Affordability isn't
everything; it's the only thing .
I have to confess that I am a born cheapskate, so the
notion of putting affordability first comes naturally to me.
When I need an umbrella, instead of buying a $38 designer
model in the department store, I opt for a functional black
one bought for $1 at the local Dollarama, where everything
costs a dollar or less. I know the $38 model would last a lot
longer, but I also know that I would probably forget it
somewhere within a month. If that $1 umbrella keeps my
head dry for just one rain shower or, better still, for a
couple of months before I lose it, I've saved myself $37.
The rural poor think in much the same way, with one
critical difference-they will kee~ that $1 umbrella in good
working order for seven years, at the end of which it will
have many patches on it and three or four improvised
splints on the handle, yet still be usable. But the re is
another big difference. To earn a single dollar, an unskilled
laborer in the United States only needs to work about ten
minutes, while his counterpart in Bangladesh or
Zimbabwe must work for two full days. To learn how to
come up w ith affordable products for poor customers in
developing countries, Western deSigners would do well to
start with a brainstorming exercise to come up with a
serviceable ten-cent umbrella .
HOW MANY ANTS DOES IT TAKE TO MAKE AHDRSEP
Put you rself in the shoes of Peter Mukula, a poor farmer w ho
lives along a dusty road twenty-five kilometers from
Livingstone, in southern Zambia. If he could afford to buy a
packhorse, he cou ld make an extra $600 a year hauling
vegetables to the Livingstone market. But there is no way he
can beg for, borrow, or steal the $soo it wou ld take to buy
one. Can you think of a practical solution to Peter's
dilemma?
Let me throw out a crazy idea: What if Peter could buy
a quarter horse? Not a purebred quarter horse, but a horse
that is a quarter the size of a regular packhorse. Let's
assume that you could buy one of these miniature horses
for $lS0 and that it could pack sixty kilograms. Would that
work? Peter would earn less money each trip, but he could
gradually use his profits to buy more miniature horses.
Once he owned four of them, they would be hauling the
same 240 kilos as a full-sized packhorse
But even if a horse a quarter of the size of a packhorse
were available, $lS0 is still far more than what he could
afford out of his $300 yearly income. To make it affordable,
Peter would need a miniature horse that is more like one
twelfth of a horse, w hich could carry twenty kilos and cost
less than $so. Peter would probably have to carry another
twenty kilos on his back to help make up the difference.
After five years, he might be able to expand to a string of
twelve pygmy horses. Only then could he earn the $600 a
year that the packhorse he dreams of would provide.
Here is an even crazier idea: Suppose we could invent a
way to harness the remarkable strength-to-weight ratio of
the common forest ant. An engineering class in Germany
designed tiny weights that could be attached to an ant's
back and determined that forest ants can carry as much as
thirty times their own weight. (A human can only carry
about double.) How many ants would it take to carry the
same load as a packhorse? An ant weighs about ten
milligrams; if it can carry twenty times its weight, it can
pack 200 milligrams. It would take one and a quarter
million ants to carry Peter's 240 kilos. A million and a
quarter ants would come pretty cheap, but designing the
harness would be quite a challenge.
I have taken you through this imaginary design
scenario to illustrate the central task of design for poor
customers-coming up with breakthroughs in both
miniaturization and affordability. The next step in the holy
trinity of affordable design is to make the new product
infinitely expandable.
FROM FOREST ANTSTO THE ASWAN DAM
If you th i nk the process of breaking a horse into twelve af
Fordable pieces is complicated, try wrapping your mind
around the problem of breaking the Aswan Dam in Egypt
down into millions of ant-sized pieces representing the
small farms that could be nourished by the wate r stored in
Lake Nasser. Big dams like Aswan are built to provide an
swers to the twin global problems of flooding and water
scarcity. But when it comes to delivering irrigation water,
extremely poor, one-acre farmers are usually left on the
outside looking in.
THE NAWSA MADSYSTEM
You may be wondering where the term Nawsa Mad comes
from; it is Aswan Dam spelled backwards. It addresses
perennial flooding and drought w ith exactly the same
strategy use€! by the Aswan Dam, but shrunk down to one
four-millionth of its size so that it fits onto a two-acre farm
and into a small farmer's pocketbook. Put another way, it
is the ant to the Aswan Dam's horse.
Like most things in my life, I stumbled into the Nawsa
Mad concept backwards. In May 2003, I was interviewing
farmers in Maharastra, India, who were using low-cost
drip systems to make the water in their open we lls stretch
a lot Further than the flood irrigation they had been using.
20
But the sixty-foot-deep, twenty-five-foot-wide wells that
were the only source of irrigation water during the dry
season cost 100,000 rupees (about $2,000) to build.
Because they were so expensive, only twenty-five to forty
percent of the farmers in Maharastra owned a welL The
rest earned a paltry income from rain-fed farming and
survived by finding work outside the farm. However,
rainwater ran off their fields in sheets during the summer
monsoon season.
Could we find a cheap, simple way to trap some of this
monsoon rainwater and store it to irrigate crops during the
dry season, from March to May, when vegetable and fruit
prices were at their peak? To create a miniaturized, on
farm version of the Aswan Dam, we had to find ways to: 1)
collect monsoon rainwater on individual farms; 2) settle
out the silt and mud in the water; 3) store it for nine
months with no evaporation; 4) deliver it from storage to
crops without wasting a drop; and, most important, 5)
develop the whole system to be affordable enough for a
poor farm family living on $300 a year, profitable enough
to pay for itself in the first year, and infinitely expandable
using the profits it generated.
Solutions for 1, 2, and 4 were easy. There are already all
kinds of rainwater-harvesting systems in place that
collect, settle, and store rainwater, and the low-cost drip
irrigation system designed by IDE could provide the means
to deliver it efficiently to crops. The critical missing link
was an enclosed, zero-evaporation water-storage system
for individual farms that was cheap enough to pay for itself
in the first growing season. We estimated that a farmer
could reasonably be expected to clear $50 from drip
irrigated, high-value crops grown in the dry season using
10,000 liters of stored water. So we set a retail price target
of $40 for the 1O,000-liter enclosed storage tank. This was
a daunting target since the cost of a 10,000-liter ferro
cement tank in India starts at $250. But we had already
made progress toward finding an affordable solution.
People allover India were using open pits lined with
plastic to store water for short periods. This was not a
solution for us because most of the wate r would evaporate
over six months in such a hot and dry climate. But the
lined pits gave me the idea of placing a fatter version of an
enclosed water bag into a pit. Jack Keller, an IDE Board
member and internationally renowned water expert,
closed the circle by pointing out that the optimal surface
to-volume ratio would be provided by a cylinder. So we
came up with the idea of a ten-meter-long, double-walled
plastic sausage in an earth trench (fig. 1). By u,;ing the
earth for structural support, we reached our price objective
of $40 for a 1O,000-liter storage tank.
The fact is, of the 1.2 billion people in the world who
earn less than $1 a day, some 900 million are small farmers
who earn most of their living from what they can grow on
their two-acre farms, split into four or five plots. Very few
of them have access to irrigation water from big dams.
Most of them live in climates with distinct monsoon and
dry seasons, where affordable on-farm waterstorage and
drip irrigation systems could enable them to produce
income-generating, high-value crops in the dry season.
AS3 DRIP IRRIGATIDN SYSTEM
Almond growers in California invest millions of dollars in
state-of-the-art drip-irrigation systems because they im
prove crop yield and quality as well as provide a miserly way
to deliver water to the roots of plants. My colleagues and I
at I DE have come up with something at the other end of the
afford ability scale-a kitchen garden d ri p kit that sells for
$3 in India (fig. 2).
Larger low-cost drip systems now sell for $160 an acre
in India-on e-fifth the cost of conventional systems. The
direct application of the bUilding blocks of affordable
design made this dramatic drop in price possible, and low
cost drip is rapidly establishing a massive new market for
effiCient, productive irrigation on small plots in India and
other countries in Asia and Africa.
There is no need to maintain high pressure in the short
plastiC pipes that deliver water to quarter-acre plots_
Cutting the pressure by eighty percent allowed us to cut
the wall thickness of the pipes, thereby lowering the cost
of material by eighty percent. The farmers themselves
taught us how to make the walls even thinner and to
provide a choice of wall thicknesses so they could pick a
system that would last however long they wanted. We
replaced expensive sand trap filters that prevent clogging
with more simple and affordable filters, and we changed
expensive high-tech emitters at drip points with simple
plastiC tubes that did not clog easily. We traded capital for
labor by making drip lines moveable from one row of
plants to the next. Finally, a farmer could start with a 20
square-meter system for $3 and expand it systematically
to five acres by reinvesting his profits, highlighting the
principles of affordability, miniaturization, and
expandability I outlined earlier.
Mohan Nitin inherited his family's two-acre farm in
Maharastra, an open well, and a five-horsepower diesel
pump. But the well could only produce a quarter acre of
flood -irrigated vegetables in the dry season, when prices
are high. Mohan and his wife, his mother, and his two
daughters, aged eight and eleven, were able to survive
only by finding occasional work on neighboring farms.
Two weeks before my visit, Mohan's family invested
$160 in an IDE Drip System for one and a quarter acres_
This was only about one seventh of what he would have
had to pay for a high-tech drip system of the same size;
nevertheless, his mother had to sell family jewelry to pay
for it. She beamed as she told me this because she now be
lieves her family's poverty will end. Mohan and his family
have planted sweet limes intercropped with eggplant as
well as a variety of vegetables, and plan to add inter
cropped pomegranate. He believes he can earn more than
$1,000 in the dry season alone, compared to the $150 or so
he was earn ing before.
21
1. Trench-supported lOjooo- liter
water storage bag undergoing test
ing in India.
2. A $3 drip Irrigation kit.
3. A drip-irrigated plot located out
side Harare, Zimbabwe.
The dramatic drop in price for drip irrigation has now
made it profitable for small farmers to start using drip on
lower-value crops like cotton and sugarcane, and some of
them are even irrigating alfalfa for their milk buffalos (fig.
3). I believe that low-cost drip systems like those
developed by I DE will, over the next ten years, take over
the majority of the world market for drip irrigation .
PEDALING TO PROSPERITY
This may sound like a large claim, but the enormous market
potential for affordable technologies like IDE Drip has al
ready been demonstrated in a powerful way. The proof lies
in the phenomenal impact of the treadle pump, a simple,
step-action pump that resembles a Stairmaster and can lift
water from up to seven meters below ground (fig. 4). While
IDE did not invent the treadle pump, we have reengineered
it to be affordable for our rural, dollar-a-day customers. (On
average, IDE'S treadle pumps currently retail for about $40
in Asia and $90 in Africa.) Since IDE first began marketing
treadle pumps in Bangladesh some twenty years ago, more
than 1.23 million units have been purchased and installed
by small farmers at an unsubsidized, fair-market price.
Using these pumps, many farmers have been able to double
their net annual incomes, ensuring a better life and long
term prosperity for their families.
A$100 HOUSE
What dollar-a-day people in rural areas desperately need is
a starter kit for a 200-square-foot house that they could
borrow money on or sell if they had to, and which they could
build for no more than $100. Homes in the United States
and Europe are getting so expensive, it is becoming harder
and harder for people to own one; remarkably, most of the
800 million or so people in the world who earn less than $1
a day and live in rural areas actually own the home they live
in. But if they tried to sell it, they would get no money for it,
and if they took it to a local banker as collateral for a loan,
tRey would get nowhere. This is because many of these
homes are made of sticks and wattle, with a thatched roof
and du ng floor, and have no value in the local market. Thei r
owners have no opportunity to build something with real
value at a price they can afford (fig. 5).
22
4. Bamboo tfeadle pump in use in
Maharashtra State, India.
But in every village, there are a few famil ies who have
a hou se built out of brick or cement block and a tile roof,
and these houses have both sales and collateral value.
They accomplish th is not by building it a little bit at a time,
because that is all the money they have to spend, and
construction loans simply are not available. I have seen far
too many designs from Western architects for refugee
shelters and rural dwellings that look elegant to the
Western eye and start at $900, which is totally out of the
refugees' and poor rural families' price range.
The no-value, stick-and-thatch home has a major flaw :
it lacks a stab le foundation and durable skeleton . All we
need to start a salable, bankable 20-square-meter home is
eight strong beams and a solid roof that does not leak.
Initially, this durable structural skeleton can be filled in
with local materials, for example, sticks covered with mud
for the walls and thatch for the roof. Then, as there is
money, the stick walls can be replaced with cement block
or brick, twenty-five bricks a,t ,a time,
Access to affordable irrigation, seeds, ways to grow
high-value crops, and profitable markets will speed up the
home-building process . If, from the very beginning, the
house is specifically designed to accept added modules,
like a LEGO set, the family who lives in it can eventually
own a house as big as they ca'n afford, When the bankable
house is completed, the famil
本文档为【design for the other 90%】,请使用软件OFFICE或WPS软件打开。作品中的文字与图均可以修改和编辑,
图片更改请在作品中右键图片并更换,文字修改请直接点击文字进行修改,也可以新增和删除文档中的内容。
该文档来自用户分享,如有侵权行为请发邮件ishare@vip.sina.com联系网站客服,我们会及时删除。
[版权声明] 本站所有资料为用户分享产生,若发现您的权利被侵害,请联系客服邮件isharekefu@iask.cn,我们尽快处理。
本作品所展示的图片、画像、字体、音乐的版权可能需版权方额外授权,请谨慎使用。
网站提供的党政主题相关内容(国旗、国徽、党徽..)目的在于配合国家政策宣传,仅限个人学习分享使用,禁止用于任何广告和商用目的。