2012届机械工程系毕业
设计
领导形象设计圆作业设计ao工艺污水处理厂设计附属工程施工组织设计清扫机器人结构设计
答辩安排
表
关于同志近三年现实表现材料材料类招标技术评分表图表与交易pdf视力表打印pdf用图表说话 pdf
doc - 永州职业技术学院(2012 Mechanical Engineering Department graduation design reply arrangement doc - Yongzhou Vocational Technical College)
2012届机械工程系毕业设计答辩安排表doc - 永州职业技术学院
(2012 Mechanical Engineering Department graduation design reply arrangement doc - Yongzhou Vocational Technical College)
I carefully collated documents, documents from the network
I only collect and sort out
In case of error
Please check it yourself!
Department of mechanical engineering, Yongzhou Vocational Technical College
Table of defense for the 2012 graduation project (Thesis)
Graduation project (Thesis) is an important component of teaching plan
It is a comprehensive summary of the students' study at school
Is also an important basis for Accreditation
My department has paid considerable attention to graduates since the beginning of 2012
Under the leadership of the dean's Office
Led by department leader
Mobilize professional backbone teachers to serve as guidance teachers for graduation projects
And regularly carry on the work progress check and student information feedback
Solve all kinds of practical problems for students in time
In order to make the graduation project a complete success
The graduation reply will be arranged as follows:
1. members of the Defense Committee
Group leader: Luo Hui, Qing Li Jun
Deputy leader: Deng Zilin, Peng Yongzhong
Instructors: Yang Dongsheng, Jiang Guosheng, Tang Aiwu, Deng Yi, Xie Xiaohua, He Genmao, Zhou Meirong, Ling Ling, He Yushan, Zhou Xianwen, Shao Xiangyong, Gui Jianguo, Zhang Yiwu, Huang jian,
Wang Wei, Mo Liping, Qin Long, Chen Xiaohui, Luo Songtao, Li Yonghui, Wu Haibo,
Jiang Wenhua, Mao Shuo, Mai Bo, Lv Haiying, Chen Yi, Lv Dijie, Wen, Xiaoping, Peng Wei, Huang Enfu
2, the respondent time and place
Time: Saturday (May 26, 2012) morning 8:00~12:00
3:00~5:00 PM
Setting: teaching building, Faculty of agriculture, Yongzhou Vocational Technical College
3, graduation design, defense requirements and matters needing attention
(1) students who participate in the defense must be 5 days before the graduation defense meeting
Submit the thesis and all relevant information to the Defense Committee after the advisor has reviewed and signed the comments
(2) students who participate in the defense must be in good order
Fluently and fluently, it introduces the name, origin, task, content, feasibility analysis, scheme demonstration and formulation of the graduation project (Thesis)
Design process, working principle, test situation, design difficulty, innovation point, novelty, application value, social and economic benefit, conclusion and so on
Focus should be highlighted
The Respondent must use chart No. 0 or No. 1 standard drawings
The presentation time is 5~10 minutes
(the best material for making courseware is demonstrated in a multimedia classroom)
(3) the principal respondent teacher (that is, the thesis instructor) answers questions about the respondent students
Generally 2~3 questions
Then ask other teachers for questions
The problem should not exceed 3
The teacher's questions must be direct and orderly
Harmonious atmosphere
To avoid causing students nervous and cause mistakes in defense
(4) the students should answer the questions raised by the teachers in an orderly, accurate and simple manner
The total time of question and answer is less than 15 minutes
(5) matters needing attention in reply;
Keep quiet in the court
Non respondent (except staff members) shall not be admitted
without permission
The review the teacher must reply in a day before the review of the design scheme, feasibility, novelty, creativity, design and program design quality, data processing, parameter calculation accuracy and fair and realistic to write comprehensive comments
This review results
And prepare questions for the students to answer
The respondent teachers should mainly focus on the graduation project design ideas and solutions, principle, basic theory, new technology, application value, social and economic benefits; the analysis of the problems is comprehensive, in-depth and meticulous; expression of the comprehensive ability of using knowledge, ability and so on questions
When necessary, the basic theoretical knowledge of the subject (subject) can be involved
Not too far away from the point
A controversial or indefinite answer
When the student is in reply
Can carry relevant information
4, graduation thesis review format
1) tutor comments: the students work attitude (regular / general) during the graduation project (Thesis)
Thesis work (hard / hard / general)
Volume of work (large / moderate / small)
Thesis difficulty (large / moderate / small)
Master the basic theories and special knowledge of the discipline (solid / good / general)
Ability to analyze and solve problems (strong / strong / general)
(well completed / better completed / completed / not completed) graduation design task
(may / may / may / may not) participate in graduation project defense
2) reviewer comments: the student's graduation design topic (appropriate / suitable / general)
The student was in the graduation project
(much / widely) reading both domestic and foreign references
Comprehensive analytical skills (strong / strong / general)
Paper organization (clear / unclear), text (smooth / out of order), diagram (standard / nonstandard)
And other evaluations (well done / completed / not completed) graduate design tasks
(may / may / may / may not) participate in graduation project defense
5. graduation respondent specific grouping
Group 1 (09 die): group leader - Deng Yi
Members: Chen Xiaohui, Wu Haibo, Qin Long
Clerk: Qin Long
Students to participate in the defense: 09 mold class students
Group second (09 NC): group leader - Tang Aiwu
Members: Zhang Yiwu, Jiang Wenhua
Clerk: Jiang Wenhua
Students who participated in the defense: 09 NC class students
Group third (09 Automation): group leader - Jiang Guosheng
Members: Li Yonghui, Lv Haiying
Clerk: Lv Haiying
Students who participated in the defense: 09 students in automation class
Fourth groups (09 Electromechanical, three dimensional directions): group leader - Xie Xiaohua
Members: Shao Xiangyong, Mo Liping
Clerk: Shao Xiangyong
Students participating in the defense: grade 09 electromechanical classes, three-dimensional direction of students
Fifth groups (09 Electromechanical, electrical direction): group leader - Wang Wei
Members: Peng Wei, Sui Jianguo
Clerk: Sui Jianguo
Students to participate in the defense: 09 electrical and mechanical classes, electrical direction of students
Sixth groups (09 machines, motor processing direction): group leader - He Yushan
Members: Chen Yi, Mai Bo
Clerk: Chen Yi
Students participating in the defense: 09 class
Electromechanical flight processing direction students
Group seventh (09 electromechanical mould direction): group leader - Zhou Xianwen
Members: Lv Dijie, Huang Jian
Clerk: Lv Dijie
To participate in the respondent students: 09 electrical and mechanical classes, mold direction students
Group eighth (09, 31 (1)): Team Leader - Yang Dongsheng
Members: Mao Shuo, Luo Songtao, Wen Xiaoping
Clerk: Wen Xiaoping
Students participating in the defense: class 09, class 31 (1), all students
Group ninth (09, 31 (2)): Team Leader - He Genmao
Members: Zhou Meirong, Xiang Ling, Huang Enfu
Clerk: to Guo Ling
Students to participate in the defense: 09, 31 (2) class of all
students
All students in each group may simultaneously reply
In principle, there are no more than 5 students in one defense,
Hope group leader is responsible for the organization of the group defense work and completion of design (Thesis) mark
Department of Mechanical Engineering
May 7, 2012