高考作文中的所谓套作作文及其评判标准之我见 target=_blank（My opinion on the so-called composition by linking in the composition of the college entrance examination and its evaluation criteria target=_blank）

高考 地理事物空间分布特征语文高考下定义高考日语答题卡模板高考688高频词汇高考文言文120个实词 作文中的所谓套作作文及其评判 标准 excel标准偏差excel标准偏差函数exl标准差函数国标检验抽样标准表免费下载红头文件格式标准下载 之我见 target=_blank（My opinion on the so-called composition by linking in the composition of the college entrance examination and its evaluation criteria target=_blank） 高考作文中的所谓套作作文及其评判标准之我见 target=_blank(My opinion on the so-called composition by linking in the composition of the college entrance examination and its evaluation criteria target=_blank) My opinions on the composition of "interplanting" and its evaluation criteria Dongguan Zhangmutou middle school Zhang Xueyuan I. what is meant by intercropping?" I do not know since when, the language test paper appeared "no interplanting" and other words and requirements. However, the examination syllabus does not say "interplanting". So, what exactly is "interplanting"? What is meant by intercropping? "I see less general narrow (i.e., neither the authority with very limited knowledge and scanty information) to hear their explanation, nor to search on the Internet related works of experts, only to see some gossip among Internet users. Generally speaking, the so-called "relay", mainly has two kinds: one is in accordance with a fixed structure mode or memorize model mode of writing, what structure does not change; the two is the material composition of materials as the basic content of writing to be expanded and interpretation. I think the first kind of situation can basically be regarded as imitation. Of course, if you copy the essay down as your own composition, you can copy it; the second one can be regarded as plagiarism. As everyone knows, there are good things only to imitate, successful problem does not exist, can give not to imitate, but there's the structure of the most effective and most people can write on what kinds of mode, what does not allow students to imitate? What's more, one of the basic tasks for students is to learn some types of writing Besides, how do you know and what to say is imitation? This is obviously a false proposition. As for plagiarism, of course not. There is no need to speak. Two, to the so-called "interplanting" composition, past and present criteria In the past although not expressly can imitate, but we all know there is no doubt that students should imitate the model of article writing, teachers also structure and method to promote and guide the students to imitate the classic article, and the imitation of good article to give a high evaluation, over the years, most of the College entrance examination marks all over the country the composition is this phenomenon using structural methods and techniques of the classical is also a good example of. But in March I attended a senior university entrance examination, speaker staff broke the amazing provisions of "material":2009 East China province college entrance examination marking group expressly and such writing criteria is the actual operation of many provinces including Guangdong Province: where the "set" (not copy) of the text, especially take "the full text is divided into five sections, the three section of the main section of the parallel structure, each section was divided into arguments and facts and reason three layer composition, are low scores or even only to a very low score, no matter how good the other hand. At the meeting, several speakers have repeatedly reminded the participants the severity of such composition of the judge this year will be worse than before, and repeatedly urged participants back to severely warned the students not to used this pattern to writing. Three, my view In my view, this approach is extremely wrong and should be corrected immediately. First, this is a serious violation of the generally accepted criteria for college entrance examination writing. "Exam outline" clearly stipulates: "in accordance with the problems and meet the style requirements, healthy thinking, enrich the content, the center clear, complete structure, language fluency and writing right" reached the "basic level". I don't know how other people understand. As far as I'm concerned, this composition should pass more than 36 points. If you can "through the in-depth nature of the phenomenon, reveal the causal relationship of things within the view, with the role of inspiration" ("deep"), or "material rich, argument enrich" ("rich"), or "word sentence is appropriate, flexible, good use of rhetoric," expressive "(namely" grace "), or" new ideas, fresh materials, reasoning (i.e. "originality" innovation ") should put the" development level "scores get, it can at least get more than 48 points. Why do you score 30 points, 20 points, or even lower for all these good compositions? Besides, Why did the original class give high marks or even full marks, and now they suddenly beat each other? This is clearly an extremely unreasonable approach to candidates, parents, teachers and the state, national and social extreme irresponsible behavior. Second, it is seriously divorced from high school students' actual situation, including writing ability and life reality. What is the actual situation of high school students now? The writing ability, most of the students do not love writing, can truly achieve the "exam outline" provisions of the "basic level" requirements have not much, can reach the level of "development level" at best is very rare. Don't say innovation and personalized, ordinary high school students, is given a model, such as the structure above is now yigunzidasi, after repeated practice, also can't write a composition with an air of importance. Then, their real life, one is to learn very much, learning tasks well, even most of the students can learn Chinese as a minor subject, composition structure mode which have so much time to train all kinds of? Is it necessary to learn and master all kinds of structural patterns, even when there is time for ordinary high school students, especially those who are not going to spend their time writing essays in the future? Third, do not allow students to imitate, ask students to innovate, the desire is good, but not realistic, because the primary and secondary school students can only be inherited mainly, the basic task of high school students is to learn and imitate. Even college students, few have the ability to innovate ah. Don't say that in ancient times, the human long history of thousands of years, in a more than tens of billions of mortals from ancient to modern times, there are a few people can really innovation? More than 99% of the people can learn and use the existing patterns well, which is very difficult, and can even be very successful! I strongly oppose training only a kind of composition structure, and indiscriminately to this kind of writing high marks even out, but I also firmly opposed to this kind of structure is only excluded. Because the most basic structure of argumentative writing is nothing more than "parallel", "contrast" and "progressive", or three, the structure of the argumentative way, there are three main. Moreover, it is well known and accepted that juxtaposition is one of the most common, common, typical and effective structures. I can't say that they are ignorant and superficial to those who are paranoid about the juxtaposition, but at least their approach is very one-sided and extreme and extremely irresponsible. Fourth, this will inevitably impact the normal high school Chinese teaching, especially high school composition teaching. As is known to all, reading teaching and composition teaching in senior high school are mainly argumentative writing. Most of the readings are typical argumentative essays, and the objects of practice and imitation are also argumentative essays. In fact, imitation is not only the main theme of composition teaching in senior high school, but also the most important, common and most effective way of existence in all walks of life. How many people in the world can innovate regularly and effectively in full sense? The vast majority of college students can only learn and imitate. High school students innovation is obviously difficult and unrealistic. Fifth, doing so will greatly dampen students' enthusiasm for learning composition. Because writing is difficult to learn, it is difficult to write, especially now the students, especially the non key middle school students can learn and use one or two kinds of structure mode is good, they should learn dozens, dozens of patterns and finally write a new composition, prohibitively difficult, the majority of students, it is not possible to achieve. That they do so, they must be constantly on the run, at a loss, even to cope with or give up learning chinese. Sixth, this will seriously blow the enthusiasm of Chinese teachers in teaching research and teaching. Just imagine, if you do not teach, do not learn, do not imitate the classic structure of the model, What are you talking about and what are your structural patterns? How can you finish it and practice it enough? Once you are a professor, an effective way, and the adults are marking the group to do in limbo? Who would be interested in serious teaching and hard work, you say? I think that students and teachers are not easy, don't be a kind of a kind this year, next year, let the students and the teachers are constantly on the run or at a loss, for young people and our people in this endless toss in consumption, lost, it is absolutely a sin. Seventh, this is clearly a serious high. Marking the teacher's writing and judging ability. Although, as a whole, those who can take part in the college entrance examination are all relatively professional and excellent, we should also admit that their levels are uneven, or that they have different preferences. Not every year there are some exam papers from heaven to hell, or from hell to heaven? Isn't that very telling? Besides, really high level of writing master, did not choose to be a teacher, a lot of the composition of the marker may not be able to even in less than an hour to finish the composition of college entrance examination of more than 800 words. Eighth, it will greatly increase the burden of teacher marking. Time is a burden, as we all know, the average time spent in the past the teacher marking each essay is about a minute, we may in Guangdong last year has doubled, to about two minutes, now to give each have a unique style (marking and marking group of students are required to do, do not say to the other). The composition of accurate scoring, no more than 10 minutes is absolutely impossible. Besides the spirit, if students really write complete creative writing, writing is not a new marking seen, let alone two minutes, most of the marking for 20 minutes, I am afraid it may not be able to accurately judge, this is undoubtedly a great mental pressure on the marking for. Ninth, for a variety of reasons, marking the teacher will consciously and unconsciously reduce students' writing scores and the total average score, it is not fair to all exam candidates and their teachers and parents, it is not good for anyone. Of course is the most unfair to those students who really talented and play but was killed by sap. This will greatly increase the unfairness and contingency, seriously damaging the seriousness and impartiality of the college entrance examination. Tenth, as mentioned earlier, marking the teacher not only level is uneven, and is the preferred, especially the criticism, completely different views, it will be difficult to make a completely rational or consistent evaluation, the express provisions of the certain patterns of composition yigunzidasi, to have some bias teacher the excuses and reasons for killing. In a word, the purpose of the system, in the college entrance examination composition, a pattern or imitation composition yigunzidasi practices is obviously unreasonable, should stop immediately and stop the introduction of a similar policy and related operation, should be objective, reasonable, fair and comprehensive evaluation of each composition, whether he adopt or imitate what structure mode. One