首页 传感器数量对应力波检测原木内部缺陷精度的影响_英文_

传感器数量对应力波检测原木内部缺陷精度的影响_英文_

举报
开通vip

传感器数量对应力波检测原木内部缺陷精度的影响_英文_ Journal of Forestry Research, 18(3): 221−225 (2007) 221 DOI: 10.1007/s11676-007-0045-5 Effect of sensor quantity on measurement accuracy of log inner defects by using stress wave WANG Li-hai, XU Hua-dong, ZHOU Ci-lin, LI Li, YANG Xue-chun North...

传感器数量对应力波检测原木内部缺陷精度的影响_英文_
Journal of Forestry Research, 18(3): 221−225 (2007) 221 DOI: 10.1007/s11676-007-0045-5 Effect of sensor quantity on measurement accuracy of log inner defects by using stress wave WANG Li-hai, XU Hua-dong, ZHOU Ci-lin, LI Li, YANG Xue-chun Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, P. R. China Abstract: Wood nondestructive testing (NDT) is one of the high efficient methods in utilizing wood. This paper explained the principle of log defect testing by using stress wave, and analyzed the effects of sensor quantity on defect testing results by using stress wave in terms of image fitting degree and error rate. The results showed that for logs with diameter ranging from 20 to 40 cm, at least 12 sensors were needed to meet the requirement which ensure a high testing accuracy of roughly 90% of fitness with 0.1 of error rate. And 10 sensors were recom- mended to judge the possible locations of defects and 6 sensors were sufficient to decide whether there were defects or not. Keywords: Sensor quantity; Log defect testing; Stress wave; Image fitting degree Introduction Quality assessment and defects detection of woods had the im- portant effects on forestry industry. Nondestructive evaluation on the properties of logs is necessary to solve practical problems without the destruction of the integrity of trees (Yang et al. 2005b). The earliest method was to take an increment core from the trees, which was considered nondestructive for its life and to develop different nondestructive techniques for studying main physical characteristics of trees. Researchers have used a number of techniques to investigate the detection of defects in wood. Conners et al. (1983) used a thresholding technique to locate surface defects on gray-scale images of hardwood lumber. Butler et al. (1989) reported that the use of RGB color information increased pixel-based defect de- tection accuracy for some subtle defects by over 20 percentage points compared to gray-scale accuracy. Sobey and Semple (1989) used the Conners et al. (1983, 1984) gray-scale approach on radiata pine (Pinus radiata) lumber, but the measures were calculated for larger local areas of fixed size and only included mean, variance, and kurtosis. They reported an overall defect detection accuracy of 95% but clear wood accuracies of only 75%−80%. Sobey et al. (1989) then followed up that study with a neural network-based classifier, but only overall classification rates were given. With the development of wood nondestructive testing tech- Foundation project: This paper was supported by the project “Devel- opment of Portable NDT Instrument (2002(39-1))” sponsored by Na- tional Forestry Administrative Bureau of China Received: 2007-05-06 ; Accepted: 2007-06-20 © Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag 2007 Electronic supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at http://dxdoi.org/10.1007/s11676-007-0045-5 Biography: WANG Li-hai (1960- ), Male, professor in Northeast For- estry University, Harbin 150040, P. R. China. Correspondence author (E-mail: lihaiwang@yahoo.com ) Responsible editor: Zhu Hong nology, stress wave technology is widely used in fields of wood industry due to its lower cost in comparison with other technolo- gies including CT and x-rays, etc. In recent years, stress wave technology has been used to test wood defect with stress wave sensors simultaneously (Wang et al. 2002). This paper studied the effects of sensor quantity on the fitness and error of testing images by using stress wave. Principle of log defect testing by using stress wave The general principle is that a sensor is flipped to produce a stress wave propagated in wood and received by other sensors. The time interval in the process is recorded to calculate the propagation speed of stress wave between two sensors. Stress wave propagation in log is a dynamic process that is directly related to the physical and mechanical properties of log. Gener- ally, wave propagates more rapid in high density hard wood and slower in low density soft wood (Yang et al. 2005a). By measur- ing wave transmission time in the radial direction, the internal condition of the log can be fairly accurately evaluated. This measured time can be used as a predictor of the physical condi- tions inside the log when it is converted to wave speed (Lin et al. 2005). Experiment methods Experiment hypotheses Ten logs in four tree species with two kinds of defects collected from Dailing Forestry Bureau, Heilongjiang Province were in- vestigated in this study. The circumference of log disc is sup- posed to be a whole circle. All kinds of log defects are supposed to be normal geometric shape. Hollow is a normal circle, and crack is a triangle or rectangle. Experiment conditions Testing work was carried out inside laboratory at temperature of 20 °C and humidity of 72%. Stress wave testing apparatus, Arbotom, was imported from Germany, and ST-85 digital apparatus of measuring log humidity, WANG Li-hai et al. 222 and computer were employed in the testing. The whole log with natural defects is earmarked in number 1, number 2, until to number 10 (Table 1). Table 1. The general characters of ten log samples Serial number Assortments Log mois- ture content (%) Log disc diameter (cm) Defect category Defect area (cm2) No.1 Aspen 8.5 36.8 Hollow 122.66 No.2 Aspen 8.6 33.74 Hollow 153.86 No.3 Birch 18.3 38.83 Hollow 196 No.4 Birch 17.5 30.24 Cracks 75.63 No.5 Aspen 9.3 31.96 Cracks 34 No.6 Korean Pine 15.5 31.19 Cracks 30.63 No.7 Korean Pine 13.5 21.96 Cracks 28 No.8 Korean Pine 13.3 31.83 Cracks 26.02 No.9 Ash 10.5 35.82 Hollow and Cracks 104.25 No.10 Ash 10.5 39.79 Hollow and Cracks 314 Experiment process The tested log stands at one place where it is 1 or 2 meters away from computer and Arbotom testing apparatus. The pins are put into the circumference of log and kept on one level. Sensors are hanged on the pins orderly keeping sensors and pins perpendicu- lar (to the horizontal plane). The arcs between the pins are meas- ured and recorded. The apparatus are connected, and the work state must be nor- mal. Detailed connecting methods are omitted. Small hammer is used to hit the shock bolt of each sensor about 8 to 10 times for reducing the random error. The data are observed and the error data should be deleted. Then the sensors with error data are hit again until error rate of all data under 3%. Meanwhile line graph and surface graph originate from Arbotom testing apparatus are analyzed. The sensors are removed from the log, the pins are fixed again and sensor quantity is changed. This experiment is repeated until to end. Experiment results Surface graph The testing log images of No.9 (Fig. 1) are taken as example to describe the experiment process. These images are tested by Arbotom software in different sensors, and intensified by Photo- shop software. Fig. 1 Cross section picture of log sample No. 9 Fig. 2 The surface graph of log sample No. 9 with 4, 6, 8, 12 sensors respectively Journal of Forestry Research, 18(3): 221−225 (2007) 223 In Fig. 2, the dark color areas are defect areas. It is clear that area and location of the tested defects approach actual defects gradually with sensor quantity increasing. Experiment data The size of graph, i.e. the length of graph (L) and the width of graph (W) can be shown from the graph originated from Ar- botom. If the size of graph is known, the defected area tested could be calculated. The calculate steps are: (1) The single grid area is calculated by using the length of graph (L) and the width of graph (W). (2) The number of grids of defects is counted for N. (3) The tested defect area is calculated by multiplying single grid area and defect grid number N (Table 2). Table 2. Tested defect area of ten log samples cm2 Sensor quantity No. Area 3 4 5 6 8 10 12 Sd 3.98 6.08 6.08 5.43 6.08 5.75 6.08 N 51 35 31 28 24 26 21 No.1 St 202.98 212.8 188.48 152.04 145.92 149.5 127.68 Sd 4.46 6.84 6.84 5.83 6.84 6.44 6.84 N 50 34 32 33 30 27 25 No.2 St 223 232.56 218.88 192.39 205.2 173.88 171 Sd 4.38 6.76 5.76 5.89 6.41 6.41 6.76 N 64 60 54 51 40 34 31 No.3 St 280.46 405.2 310.8 300.56 256.4 218.05 209.56 Sd 4.94 4.00 3.48 3.6 4 4 4 N 43 35 34 27 25 22 19 No.4 St 212.5 140 118.32 97.2 100 88 76 Sd 5.70 4.40 4.13 4.13 4.27 4.41 4.27 N 42 50 19 14 22 9 8 No. 5 St 239.50 220.44 78.47 57.82 93.94 39.69 34.16 Sd 4.00 5.69 5.15 5.14 5.50 5.50 5.69 N 41 26 25 26 15 9 6 No.6 St 163.76 147.85 128.70 133.54 82.54 49.53 34.12 Sd 3.99 5.98 5.19 5.16 5.98 5.70 5.98 N 33 18 15 15 11 7 5 No.7 St 131.59 107.56 77.78 77.41 65.78 39.92 29.88 Sd 4.15 6.06 5.15 5.68 5.68 5.68 6.06 N 29 17 17 12 9 8 5 No.8 St 120.46 103.01 87.51 68.17 51.12 45.44 30.29 Sd 6.9 5.76 4.84 4.96 5.76 5.44 5.76 N 50 50 42 31 27 23 19 No.9 St 345 288 203.09 153.76 155.52 125.12 109.44 Sd 4.67 7.11 6.08 6.22 6.22 6.76 7.11 N 93 78 57 58 54 50 46 No.10 St 434 554.67 346.56 360.89 336 337.78 327.11 Notes: N is the number of defect grids. Sd is single grid area and St is the tested defect area. From Table 2, the number of defect grid drops with sensor quantity increasing, and the tested defect area also reduces gradually, which approaches the actual defect of samples gradu- ally as a result. While closing to the actual defect, the tested de- fect area becomes smaller. But there are some data that do not conform to this rule. Because the defects of samples are very complex, there are errors during the experiment. Analysis of experiment results Image fitting degree and error rate For analyzing the effects of sensor quantity on the measurement accuracy of log defects, stress wave is used by setting two in- dexes: image fitting degree and error rate (Yang et al. 2002). Image fitting degree reflects the degree of image matching by using the ratio of actual defect area to tested defect area. zS is actual defect area, tS is tested defect area, T is image fitting degree. There is %100×= t z S ST (1) Error rate reflects the deviation degree of actual defect area to tested defect area. V is error rate. The math formula is z zt S SS V −= (2) From above two formulas, accuracy of stress wave testing is higher when image fitting degree approaches 100% and error rate approaches 0. Effects of sensor quantity on image fitting degree and error rate Image fitting degree and error rate of ten samples are calculated according to the defects area and the equation (Table 3). The image fitting degree approaches 100% and error rate ap- WANG Li-hai et al. 224 proaches 0 gradually with sensor quantity increasing (Table 3). The accuracy of stress wave testing for log defect also increases gradually with sensor quantity increasing. Table 3. The image fitting degree and the error rate of ten samples in different sensor quantity Area Sensor quantity No. 3 4 5 6 8 10 12 St 202.98 212.8 188.48 152.04 145.92 149.5 127.68 Sz 122.66 122.66 122.66 122.66 122.66 122.66 122.66 T1 60% 57% 65% 81% 84% 82% 96% No.1 V1 0.65 0.73 0.53 0.24 0.19 0.22 0.04 St 223 232.56 218.88 192.39 205.2 173.88 171 Sz 153.86 153.86 153.86 153.86 153.86 153.86 153.86 T2 69% 66% 70% 79% 75% 88% 90% No.2 V2 0.45 0.51 0.42 0.25 0.33 0.13 0.11 St 280.46 405.2 310.8 300.56 256.4 218.05 209.56 Sz 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 T3 70% 48% 63% 65% 76% 90% 94% No.3 V3 0.43 1.07 0.59 0.53 0.31 0.11 0.07 St 212.5 140 118.32 97.2 100 88 76 Sz 75.625 75.625 75.625 75.625 75.625 75.625 75.625 T4 36% 54% 64% 77% 76% 86% 99% No.4 V4 1.81 0.85 0.56 0.29 0.32 0.16 0.005 St 239.50 220.44 78.47 57.82 93.94 39.69 34.16 Sz 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 T5 14% 15% 43% 59% 36% 86% 99% No.5 V5 6.04 5.48 1.30 0.70 1.76 0.16 0.005 St 163.76 147.85 128.70 133.54 82.54 49.53 34.12 Sz 30.63 30.63 30.63 30.63 30.63 30.63 30.63 T6 19% 21% 24% 23% 37% 62% 90% No.6 V6 4.35 3.83 3.20 3.36 1.69 0.62 0.11 St 131.59 107.56 77.78 77.41 65.78 39.92 29.88 Sz 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 T7 21% 26% 36% 36% 43% 70% 94% No.7 V7 3.69 2.84 1.78 1.76 1.35 0.425 0.07 St 120.46 103.01 87.51 68.17 51.12 45.44 30.29 Sz 26.02 26.02 26.02 26.02 26.02 26.02 26.02 T8 22% 25% 30% 38% 51% 57% 86% No.8 V8 3.63 2.95 2.36 1.62 0.96 0.75 0.16 St 345 288 203.09 153.76 155.52 125.12 109.44 Sz 104.25 104.25 104.25 104.25 104.25 104.25 104.25 T9 30% 36% 51% 68% 67% 83% 95% No.9 V9 2.31 1.76 0.94 0.47 0.49 0.20 0.05 St 434 554.67 346.56 360.89 336 337.78 327.11 Sz 314 314 314 314 314 314 314 T10 72% 57% 91% 87% 93% 93% 96% No.10 V10 0.38 0.77 0.10 0.15 0.07 0.07 0.04 Regression analysis Calculation on average image fitting degree and average error rate For reducing error, the average values of image fitting degree and error rate of ten samples are used as final value, and then the relationships between them are analyzed by SPSS software. From Table 4 and Fig.3, for logs with diameter ranging from 20 to 40 cm, at least 12 sensors were needed to meet the re- quirement which ensure a high testing accuracy of roughly 90% of fitness with 0.1 of error rate. And 10 sensors are recom- mended to judge the possible locations of defects and 6 sensors are sufficient to decide whether there are defects or not. Table 4. Average image fitting degree and average error rate with different sensor quantity Sensor quantity Item 3 4 5 6 8 10 12 T 41.3% 40.5% 53.7% 61.3% 63.8% 79.7% 93.9% V 2.374 2.079 1.178 0.937 0.747 0.285 0.066 Regression analysis by using SPSS software SPSS softwares were used to conduct the regression analysis between sensor quantity and image fitting degree or error rate Journal of Forestry Research, 18(3): 221−225 (2007) 225 and the analysis results are shown as following: The correlation coefficient (R) between image fitting degree and sensor quantity is 0.983, and the regression equation is 0 .2 2 0 .0 5 8y x= + , { }3 , 4 , , 1 2x = " (3) where, y is the image fitting degree and x is the sensor quantity. The correlation coefficient (R) between error rate and sensor quantity is 0.939, and the regression equation is 2 .7 8 7 0 .2 4 7y x= − , { }3 , 4 , , 1 2x = " (4) where, y is the error rate and x is the sensor quantity. The image fitting degree and error rate between actual defect and tested defect with different sensor quantity are estimated by the regres- sion equation. Fig. 3 The relation between sensor quantity and average image fitting degree or average error rate Conclusions The correlation between sensor quantity and image fitting degree is positive and notable. The regression equation between them is 0 .2 2 0 .0 5 8y x= + , { }3 , 4 , , 1 2x = " . The correlation between sensor quantity and error rate is nega- tive and notable. The regression equation between them is 2 . 7 8 7 0 . 2 4 7y x= − , { }3 , 4 , ,1 2x = " . For logs with diameter ranging from 20 to 40cm, at least 12 sensors were needed to meet the requirement which ensure a high testing accuracy of roughly 90% of fitness with 0.1 of error rate. And 10 sensors are recommended to judge the possible locations of defects and 6 sensors are sufficient to decide whether there are defects or not. Sensor quantity has great effects on the precision of log de- fects testing by using stress wave. Appropriately increasing sen- sor quantity can enhance image fitting degree and reduce error rate, and finally enhance the precision of stress wave testing. However, it is not enough to enhance the precision of stress wave testing by increasing sensor quantity. Because it is influenced by various factors, for example power of hitting the shock bolt using small hammer, position of sensor on the level, various assort- ments, percentage of moisture and density etc. Therefore further research work should be beneficial on testing the log inner de- fects by using stress wave. References Butler, D.A., Brunner, C.C., Funck, J.W. 1989. A dual-threshold image sweep-and-mark algorithm for defect detection in veneer. Forest Products Journal, 39 (5): 25−28. Conners, R.W., McMillin, C.W., Lin, K., et al. 1983. Identifying and locating surface defects in wood: part of an automated lumber processing system. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 5 (6): 573−583. Lin Wenshu, Yang Huimin, Wan Lihai. 2005. Comparative study on ultrasonic and stress wave for nondestructive test of wood defects. Forestry Science and Technology, 30(2): 39−41. Sobey, P.J., Semple, E.C. 1989. Detection and sizing visual features in wood using tonal measures and a classification algorithm. Pattern Recognition, 22 (4): 367-380. Wang Lihai, Yang Xuechun. 2002. Current situation of research on the non-destructive testing technique for wood defects. Forestry Science and Technology, 27(3): 35−38. Yang Xuechun, Wang Lihai. 2005a. Impacts of structure defaults on propaga- tion parameters of stress wave in wood of korean Pine. Journal of North- east Forestry University, 33(1): 30−31. Yang Xuechun, Wang Lihai. 2005b. Study on the Propagation Theories of Stress Wave in Log. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 41(5): 132−138. Yang Xuechun, Wang Lihai. 2002. Research progress of testing timber char- acteristics by using stress wave technique. Forest Engineering, 18(6): 11−12. 0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 100.00% 3 4 5 6 8 10 12 Sensor quantity Im ag e fit tin g de gr ee 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 4 5 6 8 10 12 Sensor quantity Er ro r r at e Chinese Abstracts 3 黑曲霉对二氯甲烷提取物进行抑菌性能测试,结果表明该提 取物对黑曲霉没有抑菌能力。图4表2参29。 关键词:日本花柏;心材外缘;二氯甲烷提取物;气质联机; 抑菌. CLC number: Q946.8 Document code: A Article ID: 1007−662X(2007)03-0042-08 07-03-009 ACQ 防腐剂对扭叶松蓝变部分木材力学性能的影响/江京辉 任海青 吕建雄 骆秀琴 吴玉章(中国林业科学研究院木材工 业研究所,国家林业局木材科学与技术重点实验室,北京 100091)//Journal of Forestry Research.-2007, 18(3): 213−216. 本文利用三种不同浓度 ACQ 防腐剂对扭叶松蓝变木材 进行浸注处理,其浓度分别为 1.2%、2.0%和 2.8%。研究其 抗弯弹性模量、抗弯强度、冲击韧性和顺纹剪切强度(弦面) 与未处理蓝变木材相应力学性能的差异,测试 标准 excel标准偏差excel标准偏差函数exl标准差函数国标检验抽样标准表免费下载红头文件格式标准下载 参照 GB1927~1943-91。研究结果显示,经浸注处理后的试样均达 到美国 AWPA 标准 UC4A 等级规定的药剂保持量;ACQ 防 腐处理大约降低了 20%扭叶松蓝变木材的冲击韧性,与未防 腐处理试样对比,在 0.01水平上有显著差异,但不同浓度间 差异不显著;三种浓度 ACQ处理间以及与未处理的扭叶松蓝 变木材的抗弯强度、抗弯弹性模量和顺纹剪切强度差异不显 著;随着 ACQ浓度的降低,冲击韧性、抗弯强度、抗弯弹性 模量和顺纹弦面剪切强度有所增大,但影响都很小。图 4 表 10 参 6。 关键词:扭叶松,蓝变处理材,非处理材,冲击韧性,抗弯 强度,抗弯弹性模量,顺纹剪切强度(弦面) CLC number: S781.2 Document code: A Article ID: 1007−662X(2007)03-0213-04 07-03-010 不同水分条件下紫藤叶片光合作用的光响应/张淑勇(中国林 业科学研究院林业研究所, 北京 100091;国家林业局林木 培育重点实验室,北京 100091),夏江宝(滨州学院黄河三角 洲生态环境研究中心,滨州 256603),周泽福(中国林业科学 研究院林业研究所, 北京 100091;国家林业局林木培育重 点实验室,北京 100091),张光灿(山东农业大学林学院,泰 安 271018) //Journal of Forestry Research.-2007, 18(3): 217−220. 通过测定 2 年生紫藤叶片气体交换参数的光响应,确定 紫藤正常生长发育所需的土壤水分条件。结果表明:紫藤的 光合速率(Pn)、蒸腾速率(Tr)及水分利用效率(WUE)对 土壤湿度和光照强度的变化具有明显的阈值。维持紫藤同时 具有较高 Pn和WUE的土壤湿度范围,在体积含水量(VWC) 为 15.3%~26.5%,其中最佳土壤湿度为 23.3%。适宜的土壤 水分条件下,紫藤光饱和点在 800µmol·m-2·s-1 以上,在水分 不足(VWC为 11.9%,8.2%)或渍水(VWC为 26.5%)时, 光饱和点低于 400µmol·m-2·s-1。此外,光响应曲线表明,随着 光合有效辐射(PAR)增加到一特殊点,气孔限制值(Ls)和 胞间 CO2浓度出现相反的变化趋势。这个点的光合有效辐射 称为光合作用由气孔限制转变为非气孔限制的转折点。并且 不同水分条件下的转折点各不相同,当 VWC 为 28.4%, 15.3% 11.9%和 8.2%,转折点分别为 600, 1000,1000 and 400 µmol.m-2.s-1。总之,紫藤通过对自身生理机能的调节,对水 分胁迫具有较高的适应能力。图 6参 26。 关键词:净光合速率;土壤湿度;光合有效辐射;水分利用 效率;紫藤 CLC number: Q945.11 Document code: A Article ID: 1007−662X(2007)03-0217-04 07-03-011 传感器数量对应力波检测原木内部缺陷精度的影响/王立海, 徐华东, 周次林, 李莉, 杨学春 (东北林业大学,哈尔滨 150040) //Journal of Foresetry Research.-2007, 18(3): 221−225. 木材无损检测技术
本文档为【传感器数量对应力波检测原木内部缺陷精度的影响_英文_】,请使用软件OFFICE或WPS软件打开。作品中的文字与图均可以修改和编辑, 图片更改请在作品中右键图片并更换,文字修改请直接点击文字进行修改,也可以新增和删除文档中的内容。
该文档来自用户分享,如有侵权行为请发邮件ishare@vip.sina.com联系网站客服,我们会及时删除。
[版权声明] 本站所有资料为用户分享产生,若发现您的权利被侵害,请联系客服邮件isharekefu@iask.cn,我们尽快处理。
本作品所展示的图片、画像、字体、音乐的版权可能需版权方额外授权,请谨慎使用。
网站提供的党政主题相关内容(国旗、国徽、党徽..)目的在于配合国家政策宣传,仅限个人学习分享使用,禁止用于任何广告和商用目的。
下载需要: 免费 已有0 人下载
最新资料
资料动态
专题动态
is_620235
暂无简介~
格式:pdf
大小:617KB
软件:PDF阅读器
页数:6
分类:农业
上传时间:2012-11-12
浏览量:12