首页 辩论赛中的破题技巧(The debate in the essay skills)

辩论赛中的破题技巧(The debate in the essay skills)

举报
开通vip

辩论赛中的破题技巧(The debate in the essay skills)辩论赛中的破题技巧(The debate in the essay skills) 辩论赛中的破题技巧(The debate in the essay skills) In general, the debate debate has a strong debate, is not a party to the other party for special attention and special negative, that is to say, the debate can provide the pr...

辩论赛中的破题技巧(The debate in the essay skills)
辩论赛中的破 快递公司问题件快递公司问题件货款处理关于圆的周长面积重点题型关于解方程组的题及答案关于南海问题 技巧(The debate in the essay skills) 辩论赛中的破题技巧(The debate in the essay skills) In general, the debate debate has a strong debate, is not a party to the other party for special attention and special negative, that is to say, the debate can provide the probability of winning both sides are equal. Because the two sides of the crack motion analysis of different angles, and the differences in language grade level, which leads to the imbalance of the balance of power, even from the outset doomed to debate the success. This is perhaps one of the most fascinating parts of the debate. The debate of the essay, refers to the use of concise words at the beginning of the debate, said the essence of motion. The essay determines the success or failure of the debate to a great extent. It's like fighting. At first, both sides should seize the commanding heights". Occupying the "commanding heights", we have the initiative to attack, like tigers, defense, such as Taishan. The following examples of debate, essay introduces several techniques. I. additional preconditions In the debate, if the participants feel pumped to the motion of one disadvantage, can look at the topic meaning is clear, the extension is too large. If so, we can use the "additional premise" approach to narrow its denotation, enrich its connotation, so as to make its own argument solid, for the victory of the debate to create conditions. A worker in a debate, Affirmative views is "the development of the tourism industry the advantages outweigh the disadvantages; the" views "of tourism development more harm than good". If the motion itself is difficult to win to start. In the debate competition, the clever use of the "additional premise" essay skills, the debate made this interpretation: "if regardless of time, place and environment, without conditions, blind development of tourism industry, it is more harm than good." This essay narrows the topic extension, enrich the connotation, negative change for the benefit of the initiative, the global point, all living. Then the cited a number of real-life examples to prove their point of view, it is difficult to argue against Affirmative, eventually won the debate tournament victory. The debate taboo from theory to theory and the premise of additional talk a lot, "is to guide the motion reality closer, so its practical materials to argue, so as to avoid empty talk, this is an effective way to win the audience to win. Two. Show the background In the debate, some debate if only the sake of discussion, from the local small, one party dominant, the other party seems unreasonable to argue. If the disadvantaged party can take on a greater range of motion analysis to examine, by showing the motion of the background, essay can capture the sweep down irresistibly from a commanding height, debate the "commanding heights", so as to achieve the initiative. A debate, the topic was "AIDS is (not) a medical problem, not (but) social problems". From the local small, AIDS is a medical problem, its etiology, treatment and prevention are medical problems, but the use of the "show the background of the essay skills, the debate on the great social background analysis, clearly pointed out:" AIDS is the occurrence and development in the society. Must be solved by social system engineering, which is a social problem." "AIDS has its particularity, which is its infectious, fatal and harmful to the society, it has become a serious social problem, it has been far beyond the medical field. Therefore, the control of AIDS can only rely on the power of the community as a whole." Square is difficult to refute, defeated. The essay stand high and see far, macroscopically discussed, condescending, aggressive, eloquent, and Affirmative from microcosmic, whether from the momentum or from the combination of theory and fact, are difficult to contend with opposition. The importance of a remarkable essay. Three, take the lead in defining In debate, the debate of ginseng can snatch the initiative, the first to make a favor and not conducive to each other's definition to some key subjects, And then make their own interpretation of the motion, before the other occupied debate "commanding heights", suddenly launched an offensive, the other immediately into a passive, be taken by surprise, will Parry thin, weak counterattack. In a financial system of workers in the debate, debate is: foreign investment can ensure the rapid economic growth in developing countries. In this sentence, "guarantee" should mean that the growth of developing countries can be rapidly increased with foreign investment. Obviously, the statement is too absolute, so Affirmative almost no debate, vulnerable to the attack. At the start of the debate, the square took the lead in redefining the term "ensure" by using its own definition of priority: "ensuring '" does not mean "one hundred percent guarantees". For example, on a bus in a big city, the conductor often calls with a loudspeaker: "in order to ensure the safety of all passengers, please do not hold the door." This does not mean that as long as you do not lift the door, the passenger's safety can be guaranteed one hundred percent." Affirmative "to ensure that" one word is redefined in favor of one's own, analysis of the debate became "foreign investment may make rapid economic growth in developing countries, of course, may be due to various reasons, not up to the rapid growth of economy". The opposition has not prepared, I do not know how to refute, actually default this definition, put themselves in a dilemma. This essay makes Affirmative argument is really a high skill, solid and flexible, into the attack, retreat, in an invincible position, move the passive, passive bidding, resulting in failure. Four, dialectical explanation In the debate, and debate should be good at making dialectical thinking on the topic, from the dialectical relationship between unity of opposites in the perspective of social and Dialectical Interpretation of the motion, look through the phenomenon of nature, views more incisive argument superior to others. In a debate on the topic is: the implementation of environmental protection will reduce the rate of economic growth. "We are a staunch supporter of environmental protection and we want to protect both the environment and the economy," he said as he entered the field. But you can not have it both ways. For the survival and development of mankind, and for the happiness of future generations, we would rather slow down economic growth and protect the environment." Indeed, the dialect is extremely elegant and valuable, impressed the judges and audience, prevailed. The opposition in this unfavorable situation, if you want to clarify the implementation of environmental protection does not reduce the rate of economic growth, with the judges and the audience's feelings clearly contrary, does not do well, will give people the impression of chicanery. The use of "Dialectical Interpretation" essay skills, clearly pointed out: "look from the phenomenon that the sun revolves around the earth, in essence, the earth around the sun; from the local perspective, the earth is flat, on the whole, the earth is spherical. Similarly, from the phenomenon, local, temporary point of view, the implementation of environmental protection seems to reduce the rate of economic growth, but in essence, the overall and long-term point of view, the implementation of environmental protection does not reduce, but will increase the rate of economic growth." The opposition made a Dialectical Interpretation of the motion, the natural phenomena are analogical argumentation, eloquent essay won the audience's applause and cheers. The clever essay, to the judges and the audience showed the essence through the phenomenon, the general account, reckoning tolerance, and Affirmative compared argument lofty and strict logic, laid the foundation of victory. Five, seek advantages and avoid disadvantages In debate, the debate should contain reference subjects "benefit" and "harm" factors are comprehensive and careful analysis to the "advantage" in the essay, or even harm into one's own, can get rid of the passive situation, take the initiative and win the victory of the controversy create favorable conditions. The Journal of speech and eloquence club in Chengdu at the national staff in a debate, a debate is: is the basis for marriage is not equal. At first glance this topic seems to Affirmative adverse, because "equal" is for "criticism" point of view, However, Affirmative is good at the disadvantages, such as essay: "the match is just a metaphor, the metaphor of marriage in their family, experience, culture, social status and personality, hobbies and other aspects of the general approach or consistent. The ancients called out "brambling yasutomo lofty ambition is" heroic utterance. "In the days may get, is willing to knot ', Mirs and sparrow cannot not partner fly side by side, the reason is unsuitable!" As soon as the voice had just fallen, a loud applause broke out on the pitch. This essay is to create new styles, to resolve the debate of unfavorable factors into favorable factors, the conventional word explanation has injected new meaning. The scope of the motion of the debate has been completely out of the "marriage status is" topic up HUAWEI "marriage to like-minded" topic, Affirmative completely achieved initiative in the contest. In short, in a debate, succeeded in solving the debate, to match the success of the argument. The advantage is the first step in winning the debate. It is like chess in the layout, has a decisive influence on the development of the game. As long as the Senate debate can according to the specific circumstances of the topic carefully analyze and explore new ideas, excavate essence, choose the angle, essay will create new styles, both in debate and freely, according to the advance and retreat, and better defense. Love debate friends, if you want to win in the debate, we must seriously study the skills, flexible use.
本文档为【辩论赛中的破题技巧(The debate in the essay skills)】,请使用软件OFFICE或WPS软件打开。作品中的文字与图均可以修改和编辑, 图片更改请在作品中右键图片并更换,文字修改请直接点击文字进行修改,也可以新增和删除文档中的内容。
该文档来自用户分享,如有侵权行为请发邮件ishare@vip.sina.com联系网站客服,我们会及时删除。
[版权声明] 本站所有资料为用户分享产生,若发现您的权利被侵害,请联系客服邮件isharekefu@iask.cn,我们尽快处理。
本作品所展示的图片、画像、字体、音乐的版权可能需版权方额外授权,请谨慎使用。
网站提供的党政主题相关内容(国旗、国徽、党徽..)目的在于配合国家政策宣传,仅限个人学习分享使用,禁止用于任何广告和商用目的。
下载需要: 免费 已有0 人下载
最新资料
资料动态
专题动态
is_337177
暂无简介~
格式:doc
大小:30KB
软件:Word
页数:7
分类:生活休闲
上传时间:2018-02-02
浏览量:34