某高科技公司绩效考评表（A high-tech company performance appraisal form）

某高科技公司绩效考评 表 关于同志近三年现实表现材料材料类招标技术评分表图表与交易pdf视力表打印pdf用图表说话 pdf （A high-tech company performance appraisal form） 某高科技公司绩效考评表(A high-tech company performance appraisal form) Home company director / Department Manager quarterly appraisal form Employee name: Position: Department: Assessment period: Performance appraisal 1, quarterly work plan completion summary: (completed by the appraisal staff) Work plan for the quarter Completion of the plan One One Two Two Three Three Four Four Five Five Six Six 2, the quarterly overview: (by staff to fill in, attach another quarter report) The following are the scoring criteria: Unsatisfactory (less than 60 points) Staff performance and company requirements vary greatly, the company needs to increase the management of the staff Below target requirements (60-80) The employee plan is not up to the expectations of the company. The employee should develop a detailed performance improvement plan under the direction of his supervisor Meet the target requirements (80-90) The completion of the post staff plan basically meet the company requirements for the post Above target requirements (above 90) The performance of the staff at this level is outstanding, and their work is representative of all aspects 1, the completion of the plan evaluation table: (this part of the assessment by the direct leadership fill in, out of 100 points) Fill in comments Completion of the plan scoring: (directly under the leadership evaluation) 2. Direct leadership suggestion: 3 、 human resources department recommends: Note: the HR department needs to feedback the results to the person being evaluated Signature table Signature of the person being evaluated Direct leadership signature Signature of jury Human resources manager signature Evaluation completion time Director of FAI COMPANY / Department Manager, annual assessment form Employee name: Position: Department: Assessment period: Performance evaluation is based on three aspects: work performance, work ability and work attitude Performance appraisal 1, the completion of the annual plan brief (completed by the assessment staff, accompanied by annual work report) Work plan for the year Completion of the plan 2, the completion of the assessment plan: (this part of the assessment by the direct higher ups fill out 100 points) Fill in comments The appraisee direct supervisor according to the appraisee report of plan evaluation scoring Plan achievement evaluation score: The following are the scoring criteria: Unsatisfactory (less than 60 points) Staff performance and company requirements vary greatly, the company needs to increase the management of the staff Below target requirements (60-80) The employee plan is not up to the expectations of the company. The employee should develop a detailed performance improvement plan under the direction of his supervisor Meet the target requirements (80-90) The completion of the post staff plan basically meet the company requirements for the post Above target requirements (above 90) The performance of the staff at this level is outstanding, and their work is representative of all aspects Work attitude evaluation 1, work attitude assessment form (by direct leadership, level leadership, Department staff fill out) Assessment content weight Score Are there adequate preparations for the implementation of the business plan? 20% Are you interested in employee growth and productivity? 20% Are you concerned about the long-term direction of the company and the implementation of long-term goals? 10% Is the problem comprehensive? 10% Are you brave enough to take responsibility? 10% Does it focus on teamwork and team spirit? 10% Does it focus on employee training? 10% Are you asking yourself to set an example? 10% Summary 100% 2, work attitude evaluation summary sheet Examiner Score Evaluation weight Weighted score Direct leadership 50% Level leadership 20% Staff evaluation average 30% Summary 100% Work attitude assessment score 3, work attitude evaluation form According to the employee's work attitude score, the human resource department determines its work attitude and evaluation level Corresponding scoring 100 points -90 points 90 points -80 points 80 points -70 points 70 points -60 points 60 points or less level A is especially good B excellent C regular D needs hard work E Explain Disciplined and active in work. Belong to a team model Be loyal to one's duties and efficiency Trustworthy, but still need to work actively Hope for self innovation and effort A fundamental re education is needed Work attitude rating: Work ability evaluation This section lists the 3 core competencies of this position. Please evaluate the performance of the year by the participants and fill in each indicator in the box Summary of core competencies: (direct leadership, sub level leadership scoring, human resources department is responsible for filling out) Core competence Examiner Score Evaluation weight Weighted score Capacity weighting Weighted aggregated score Direct leadership 70% Level leadership 30% Direct leadership 70% Level leadership 30% Direct leadership 70% Level leadership 30% Summary 100% Ability to work eventually scored: Overall performance appraisal 1. Summary of performance appraisal (completed by human resources department) Evaluation items Scoring weight Weighted score Job performance 60% Industrial attitudes 20% Working ability 20% Summary 100% Total score of performance appraisal: 2, directly under the leadership of the evaluation table (using text to describe the assessment of the performance of people in the assessment, the overall performance of work ability and two aspects of the need to improve) working attitude Aspects to be improved Action arrangements Job performance Need improvement Action arrangements Working ability Need to improve Action arrangements 3. Signature form (completed by the person being evaluated, directly under the leadership and human resources department) Signature of the person being evaluated Direct leadership signature Signature of jury Human resources manager signature Evaluation completion time Performance evaluation work change and implementation adjustment sheet The following is filled out by human resources department 1, employee overall performance evaluation form: Dissatisfied Acceptable Satisfied Over average Excellent Failure to achieve the desired goal must be improved Most of the major projects have achieved the desired objectives A small number of important projects exceeded expectations A number of important projects exceeded expectations Most of the major projects exceeded expectations 2, the performance evaluation of the overall evaluation: (whether the assessment of job changes and salary adjustments) 3. The work change analysis of the evaluated person: Employee interests and objectives Staff promotion direction What are the potential aspects of employee promotion? Promotion possibility Employee defects are reflected in those areas Downgrade or transfer direction and possibility 4. Analysis of the adjustment of the salary of the evaluated person: Employee present salary scale Proposed range of salary adjustment Analysis of the reasons for staff salary adjustment Possibility of salary adjustment 5 signature form: (by direct leader, human resources manager) Direct leadership comments Direct leadership signature Human resources manager comments Human resources manager signature Evaluation time Employee training interview form The following is completed by interview with HR department and staff 1, last year's employee training plan has reached what specific results?: 2, according to the results of the assessment, the company for training staff ability or improve existing work performance will be taken, including: 3, what are the specific steps involved in improving the performance? When to do it? Who will be responsible for the completion? : 4. What results will be achieved when the employee training plan will be evaluated in the next year?: 5, signature form: (by the Ministry of human resources, direct leadership to fill) Human resources department comments Human resources manager signature Direct leader review signature Interview time Home company staff quarterly quarterly appraisal form Employee name: Position: Department: Assessment period: Performance appraisal 1, quarterly work plan completion summary: (completed by the appraisal staff) Work plan for the quarter Completion of the plan One One Two Two Three Three Four Four Five Five Six Six 2, the quarterly overview: (by staff to fill in, attach another quarter report) The following are the scoring criteria: Unsatisfactory (less than 60 points) Staff performance and company requirements vary greatly, the company needs to increase the management of the staff Below target requirements (60-80) The employee plan is not up to the expectations of the company. The employee should develop a detailed performance improvement plan under the direction of his supervisor Meet the target requirements (80-90) The completion of the post staff plan basically meet the company requirements for the post Above target requirements (above 90) The performance of the staff at this level is outstanding, and their work is representative of all aspects 1, the completion of the plan evaluation table: (out of 100 points) Fill in comments Completion of the plan scoring: (directly under the leadership evaluation) 2. Direct leadership suggestion: 3 、 human resources department recommends: Signature table Signature of the person being evaluated Direct leadership signature Signature of jury Human resources manager signature Evaluation completion time Annual staff performance appraisal form for Hui Hui company Employee name: Position: Department: Assessment period: Performance evaluation is based on three aspects: work performance, work ability and work attitude Performance appraisal 1. Brief description of annual plan completion (attached to annual work report) Work plan for the year Completion of the plan 2, the completion of the plan evaluation table: (out of 100 points) Fill in comments The appraisee direct supervisor according to the appraisee report of plan evaluation scoring Plan achievement evaluation score: The following are the scoring criteria: Unsatisfactory (less than 60 points) Staff performance and company requirements vary greatly, the company needs to increase the management of the staff Below target requirements (60-80) The employee plan is not up to the expectations of the company. The employee should develop a detailed performance improvement plan under the direction of his supervisor Meet the target requirements (80-90) The completion of the post staff plan basically meet the company requirements for the post Above target requirements (above 90) The performance of the staff at this level is outstanding, and their work is representative of all aspects Work attitude evaluation 1, work attitude assessment form (direct leadership and separate leadership fill out) Assessment content weight Score Attendance rate 10% Are you serious about completing the task? 20% Is it efficient? 15% Compliance with superior instructions? 10% Report the work to the superior in time and accurately 10% Is there a sense of responsibility and willing to take on more responsibility? 20% Are you open-minded and eager to learn? 15% Summary 100% 2, work attitude evaluation summary sheet Examiner Score Evaluation weight Weighted score Direct leadership 70% Level leadership 30% Summary 100% Work attitude assessment score 3, work attitude evaluation form According to the employee's work attitude score, the human resource department determines its work attitude and evaluation level Corresponding scoring 100 points -90 points 90 points -80 points 80 points -70 points 70 points -60 points 60 points or less level A is especially good B excellent C regular D needs hard work E Explain Disciplined and active in work. Belong to a team model Be loyal to one's duties and efficiency Trustworthy, but still need to work actively Hope for self innovation and effort A fundamental re education is needed Work attitude rating: Work ability evaluation This section lists the 3 core competencies of this position. Please evaluate the performance of the year by the participants and fill in each indicator in the box Summary of core competency evaluation: (direct leadership, sub level leadership scoring, human resources department is responsible for filling out) Core competence Examiner Score Evaluation weight Weighted score Capacity weighting Weighted aggregated score Direct leadership 70% Level leadership 30% Direct leadership 70% Level leadership 30% Direct leadership 70% Level leadership 30% Summary 100% Ability to work eventually scored: Overall performance appraisal 1. Summary of performance appraisal (completed by human resources department) Evaluation items Scoring weight Weighted score Job performance 50% Industrial attitudes 20% Working ability 30% Summary 100% Total score of performance appraisal: 2, directly under the leadership of the evaluation table (using text to describe the assessment of the performance of people in the assessment, the overall performance of work ability and two aspects of the need to improve) working attitude Aspects to be improved Action arrangements Job performance Need improvement Action arrangements Working ability Need to improve Action arrangements 3. Signature form (completed by the person being evaluated, directly under the leadership and human resources department) Signature of the person being evaluated Direct leadership signature Signature of jury Human resources manager signature Evaluation completion time Performance evaluation work change and implementation adjustment sheet The following is filled out by human resources department 1, employee overall performance evaluation form: Dissatisfied Acceptable Satisfied Over average Excellent Failure to achieve the desired goal must be improved Most of the major projects have achieved the desired objectives A small number of important projects exceeded expectations A number of important projects exceeded expectations Most of the major projects exceeded expectations 2, the performance evaluation of the overall evaluation: (whether the assessment of job changes and salary adjustments) 3. The work change analysis of the evaluated person: Employee interests and objectives Staff promotion direction What are the potential aspects of employee promotion? Promotion possibility Employee defects are reflected in those areas Downgrade or transfer direction and possibility 4. Analysis of the adjustment of the salary of the evaluated person: Employee present salary scale Proposed range of salary adjustment Analysis of the reasons for staff salary adjustment Possibility of salary adjustment 5 signature form: (by direct leader, human resources manager) Direct leadership comments Direct leadership signature Human resources manager comments Human resources manager signature Evaluation time Employee training interview form The following is completed by interview with HR department and staff 1, last year's employee training plan has reached what specific results?: 2, according to the results of the assessment, the company for training staff ability or improve existing work performance will be taken, including: 3, what are the specific steps involved in improving the performance? When to do it? Who will be responsible for the completion? : 4. What results will be achieved when the employee training plan will be evaluated in the next year?: 5, signature form: (by the Ministry of human resources, direct leadership to fill) Human resources department comments Human resources manager signature Direct leader review signature Interview time 1 (1) provide free access to mass management data! More free downloads, at 1 (1)