Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology
Volume 2011, Article ID 860578, 8 pages
doi:10.1155/2011/860578
Review Article
Therapeutic Implications of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in
Liver Injury
Maria Ausiliatrice Puglisi,1 Valentina Tesori,1 Wanda Lattanzi,2 Anna Chiara Piscaglia,1
Giovanni Battista Gasbarrini,3 DomenicoM. D’Ugo,4 and Antonio Gasbarrini1
1 GI & Liver Stem Cell Research Group (GILSteR), Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Gemelli Hospital,
Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
2 Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Catholic Univeristy of the Sacred Heart, Largo F. Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
3 Medical Research Foundation ONLUS, Galleria falcone Borsellino 2, Bologna, Italy
4 Department of Surgical Sciences, Gemelli Hospital, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
Correspondence should be addressed to Maria Ausiliatrice Puglisi, ausiliapuglisi@yahoo.it
Received 15 July 2011; Revised 17 October 2011; Accepted 17 October 2011
Academic Editor: Ken-ichi Isobe
Copyright © 2011 Maria Ausiliatrice Puglisi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons
Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is
properly cited.
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), represent an attractive tool for the establishment of a successful stem-cell-based therapy of liver
diseases. A number of different mechanisms contribute to the therapeutic effects exerted byMSCs, since these cells can differentiate
into functional hepatic cells and can also produce a series of growth factors and cytokines able to suppress inflammatory responses,
reduce hepatocyte apoptosis, regress liver fibrosis, and enhance hepatocyte functionality. To date, the infusion of MSCs or MSC-
conditioned medium has shown encouraging results in the treatment of fulminant hepatic failure and in end-stage liver disease in
experimental settings. However, some issues under debate hamper the use of MSCs in clinical trials. This paper summarizes the
biological relevance of MSCs and the potential benefits and risks that can result from translating theMSC research to the treatment
of liver diseases.
1. Introduction
The liver has a remarkable regenerative capacity in response
to acute injury. Mature hepatocytes can reenter the cell
cycle and undergo several cell divisions to restore the
hepatic mass. However, following chronic liver damage, the
regenerative ability of hepatocytes is lost. In such conditions,
the liver is unable to maintain its functional mass; this is
clinically mirrored by the so-called “liver failure.” Currently,
orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) represents the most
suitable therapeutic option for patients with advanced liver
diseases and hepatic failure. Nevertheless, only a minority of
candidates undergo OLT, given the organ shortage. Hence,
alternative strategies for the treatment of decompensated
liver diseases are needed to be developed [1].
Cell-based therapy has been proposed as a potential
alternative to OLT. Indeed, it has been known for more
than 30 years that hepatocytes isolated from a donor liver
and infused intraportally in animal models of liver damage
can be engrafted into the recipient hepatic parenchyma and
express metabolic activity. These results have encouraged
clinical trials using hepatocytes transplantation to treat a
variety of liver diseases [2]. The best outcome of allogeneic
hepatocytes transplantation was reported for the treatment
of acute liver failure, in which hepatocytes infusion provides
the rapid metabolism of liver toxins and the stabilization
of hemodynamic parameters. However, transplantation of
liver cells provides serious practical problems: donor scarcity,
risk of rejection, low hepatocyte viability (only 30% of
hepatocytes survive transplantation) and inability maintain
and amplify cell cultures [3, 4].
Given this background, a growing enthusiasm has
greeted the development of stem-cell-based therapies for
liver diseases. In particular, transplantation of hematopoietic
bone marrow (BM) stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells
(MSCs) has been extensively investigated as potential sources
for liver regeneration.
In 1999, Petersen et al. first showed that liver stem cells
might be derived from BM, in a rat model of liver injury [5],
and it was suggested that BM could contribute to the mature
2 Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology
hepatocyte population. Subsequent studies have shown that
BM-derived hepatocytes might arise from cell fusion and
not only by direct differentiation [6] and that BM cells give
a limited contribution to the hepatocyte population, under
physiological conditions or in response to mild injury [7].
MSCs represent another promising candidate for liver
stem cell therapy. Several studies have demonstrated that
MSCs can differentiate in vitro along the hepatogenic lineage
[8, 9]. To date, studies on animal models reported the benefi-
cial effect of MSCs in promoting hepatic tissue regeneration.
Kuo et al. have shown that both MSC-derived hepatocytes
andMSCs, transplanted by either intrasplenic or intravenous
route, can be engrafted into the recipient liver and differenti-
ate into functional hepatocytes. Intravenous transplantation
was more effective in rescuing liver failure than intrasplenic
transplantation. Moreover, MSCs were more resistant to
reactive oxygen species in vitro, reduced oxidative stress in
recipient mice, and accelerated repopulation of hepatocytes
after liver damage, suggesting a possible role for paracrine
effects [10]. These results have been confirmed also by Banas
et al., who evaluated the therapeutic potential of MSCs
for the treatment of liver failure and postulated that the
beneficial effects of human MSC transplantation were due at
least in part to the cells’ ability to produce a large number
and volume of bioactive factors [11]. To date, only a few
clinical trials have been performed in patients with end-
stage liver disease caused by hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and
alcoholic fibrosis. The results of these studies have shown
that MSC injection can be used for the treatment of end-
stage liver diseases, with satisfactory tolerability and clinically
relevant effects [12]. Nonetheless, these studies have not
provided definitive evidence that MSCs have a capability
to differentiate into functional hepatocytes in vivo [13],
because the observed improvements could be attributed to
the secretion of soluble growth factors by MSCs, rather
than to their transdifferentiation into hepatocytes [7]. MSC
cells have also emerged as promising candidate cells for
immunomodulation therapy, especially in the setting of liver
transplantation, given their ability to interact at various levels
with the immune system [14, 15].
Overall, a number of different mechanisms contribute
to the therapeutic effects exerted by MSCs, which can
differentiate into functional hepatic cells and also produce
a series of growth factors and cytokines that can sup-
press inflammatory responses, reduce hepatocytes apoptosis,
regress liver fibrosis, and enhance hepatocytes functionality
[16].
2. MSC Properties
MSCs were first described by Friedenstein in the early 1990s,
as an adherent, fibroblastoid cell population that showed
inherent osteogenic properties [17]. Numerous studies have
demonstrated that MSCs have a high degree of plasticity,
as they differentiate into cells of the mesenchymal lineage,
but they can also transdifferentiate into neurons, splenocytes,
and various epithelial cells, including lung, liver, intestine,
and kidney cells. BM was originally considered the reference
source for MSC isolation, although they have been isolated
from a multitude of adult tissues, including muscle, adipose
tissue, connective tissue, trabecular bone, synovial fluid,
along with perinatal tissues, such as umbilical cord, amniotic
fluid, and placenta [18]. In particular, adipose tissue (AT)
has several advantages compared to other adult tissues as
a source of MSCs. Indeed, AT is abundant and can be
easily removed by simple lipoaspirate. Moreover, adipose-
tissue-derived MSCs (AT-MSCs) can be maintained longer
in culture and possess a higher proliferation capacity than
BM-derived MSCs. Thus, AT may be an ideal source of large
numbers of autologous stem cells [19].
MSCs do not express the hematopoietic surface markers
CD34 and CD45, but stain positive for CD44, CD29, CD105,
CD73, and CD166 [20]. Moreover, MSCs express human
leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I, but not HLA class II, and
secrete several extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules, such
as collagen, fibronectin, laminin, and proteoglycans. For
this reason it has been postulated that MSCs might play a
central role in ECM organization. We performed a high-
throughput molecular analysis of BM- and AT-MSCs. The
gene expression profile analysis has revealed that they share
190 coherentlymodulated transcripts, whichmight represent
the molecular “MSC stemness signature.” Among them, we
found several genes involved in basic biologic mechanisms,
such as embryogenesis, organogenesis, signal transduction,
cell adhesion, stress response, and transcription regulation.
In particular, a key role in determining the outcome of
MSC fate determination is played by KLF4, highlighting the
specific binding of KLF4 to regulatory sequences of genes
involved in adult stem cell maintenance [19].
BM-derivedMSCs are known to naturally support hema-
topoiesis by secreting a number of trophic molecules, includ-
ing soluble extracellular matrix glycoproteins, cytokines, and
growth factors [21, 22]. Recent studies have demonstrated
that MSCs can produce some antiapoptotic cytokines such
as stromal-cell-derived factor-1 and vascular endothelial
growth factor, which efficiently reduce the apoptosis of recip-
ient cells via the stromal cell-derived factor-1/CX chemokine
receptor-4 axis. The antiapoptotic effects of MSCs have been
observed in liver injury models [23–26]. Furthermore, MSCs
can secrete several cytokines such as hepatocyte growth
factor (HGF), epidermal growth factor, IL-6, and TNF-α;
in turn, these cytokines stimulate hepatocyte proliferation
and maintain hepatocyte function, as indicated by the high
levels of albumin and urea secretion granted upon MSC
transplantation [27]. Finally, MSCs can produce a series of
cytokines and signal molecules that can potentially suppress
inflammatory responses such as IL-1 receptor antagonists
and can upregulate anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-
10 [25].
3. MSC Plasticity
Given their wide differentiation potential and their self-
renewal capacity, MSCs have been considered a promising
candidate for cell-based therapy and tissue engineering.
Moreover, these cells have the ability to proliferate to an
extensive but finite degree, an important characteristic that
Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology 3
should reduce concerns about potential tumorigenicity upon
in vivo transplantation.
The high degree of plasticity of MSCs has been widely
demonstrated during the last decade [28–31]. In particular,
in vitro models, using culture medium supplemented with a
cocktail of growth factors, were used to successfully induce
the transdifferentiation of MSCs into hepatic cells with
functional properties, such as the production of albumin
and urea, along with glycogen storage [32]. Moreover, the in
vivo transdifferentiation of MSCs into hepatic cells has been
described in rats [33], mice [34], and humans [35].
Seo et al. first reported that human AT-MSCs injected
into SCID mice, following toxic liver damage, were able to
differentiate into hepatocyte-like cells [36]. Several reports
have confirmed the possibility of generating hepatocyte-like
cells from AT-MSCs [37, 38]. In particular, in a xenogeneic
transplantation model of liver regeneration, the engraftment
of AT-MSCs predifferentiated in vitro to hepatocyte-like cells
was significantly more efficient versus undifferentiated AT-
MSCs, and AT-MSCs were better candidates than BM-MSCs
for cell therapies [39].
We confirmed that AT-MSCs can transdifferentiate in
vitro into hepatocyte-like cells, using a two-step protocol
with sequential addition of growth factors. Under this
regimen, spindle-shaped fibroblastoid cells differentiated to
a layer of compact polygonal epithelial cells. These cells
acquired specific liver functions, as shown by their ability
to store glycogen and to express hepatic-associated genes
and proteins. Moreover, the comparative high-throughput
molecular analysis of AT-MSCs, before and after hepato-
genic conversion, allowed the identification of a complex
interplay between cell receptors, signaling pathways, and
transcription factors, responsible for tissue cross-lineage
conversion through the mesenchymal-epithelial transition
(MET). Our study showed that the AT-MSC plasticity is
dependent on MET and suggested that subtle regulations
of the canonical pathways of BMP, WNT, and TGF-β may
be important to allow MSCs to transdifferentiate into other
lineages [40].
The pivotal role that MET plays in determining AT-
MSCs transdifferentiation in hepatocytes was also confirmed
in an interesting article by Yamamoto and colleagues [41].
The authors compared the transcriptomes of three cell
populations, undifferentiated AT-MSCs, AT-MSC-derived
hepatocytes (AT-MSC-Hepa) and human primary hepato-
cytes, and human liver tissue, using microarray analysis.
The results indicated that AT-MSC-Hepa and hepatocytes
displayed a similar gene expression profile, while undif-
ferentiated AT-MSCs showed a different pattern. The list
of genes upregulated in AT-MSC-Hepa, liver cells, and
tissue comprised, in particular, genes encoding hepatocyte-
specific metabolic enzymes and markers [41]. Interestingly,
the microarray data indicated the downregulation of two
regulators of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT),
Twist and Snail, along with the upregulation of epithelial
markers, such as E-cadherin and a-catenin, in AT-MSC-
Hepa. In contrast, the expression of mesenchymal markers,
such as N-cadherin and vimentin, was downregulated. These
findings support the notion that MET is activated during the
hepatic differentiation of AT-MSCs, representing a pivotal
step for stem cell transdifferentiation [41].
4. MSCs and Immune System
MSCs express fewHLA class I and no HLA class II molecules,
allowing them to evade allogeneic immune response. This
is the so-called “immunoprivilege,” an interesting feature
in MSC biology, which makes these cells extremely suitable
for both autologous and allogeneic transplantation [42].
Moreover, several studies have established that MSCs exert
a generally suppressive effect on a wide variety of cells
belonging to both adaptive and innate immunity, including
T and B lymphocytes and natural killer cells (NKs). This
immunomodulatory effect provides a rational basis for the
application of MSCs in the treatment of immune-mediated
diseases, such as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). To date,
the mechanisms underlying this immunoregulation remain
unclear: some investigators suggested a cell-to-cell contact-
mediated suppression, while others hypothesized a soluble-
factor-mediated mechanism [43].
MSCs can suppress the activity of CD8+ cytotoxic T
lymphocytes both directly by inhibiting their proliferation
following antigen stimulation and indirectly by increasing
the relative proportion of CD4+ T helper-2 (TH2) lym-
phocytes and CD4+ regulatory T lymphocytes [44]. Since
B-lymphocyte activation is largely T cell dependent, the
influence of MSCs on T lymphocytes may also indirectly
suppress B-cell functions [45]. Additionally, MSCs exert a
direct influence on B-lymphocytes via cell-cell contact and
through secretion of paracrine molecules [46].
MSCs exert significant effects on the innate immune
system cells, including monocytes, dendritic cells (DCs),
macrophages, NKs, and neutrophils. The mechanisms by
which MSCs exert their inhibitory effect on DC maturation
is still poorly defined. Spaggiari et al. have shown in vitro
that MSCs inhibit the early stages of the progression from
monocytes to immature DCs, induced by interleukin-4 (IL-
4) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor
(GM-CSF). The authors have shown that different soluble
factors mediate the inhibitory effect exerted by MSCs, and
they provided a convincing evidence of the pivotal role
of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) [47]. MSCs have a profound
inhibitory effect on NK function, suppressing the IL-2-
induced cell proliferation, their cytolytic activity, and the
production of cytokines. MSCs can inhibit NK-cell function
via the production of soluble factors, including indoleamine
2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) and PGE2 [48]. Lastly, an in vitro
study demonstrated that MSCs inhibit apoptosis, expression
of adhesion molecules, and migration capability of neu-
trophils. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that,
within the BMniche,MSCs protect neutrophils of the storage
pool from apoptosis, preserving their effector functions.
Moreover, MSCs reduce intensity of the respiratory burst
preventing the excessive or inappropriate activation of the
oxidative metabolism. This may be a critical mechanism
through which MSCs can limit the severity of tissue damage
following ischemic and ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury
[49].
4 Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology
5. Therapeutic Implications of MSC-Based
Treatments of Liver Diseases
The therapeutic potentialities ofMSCs are also based on their
inherent ability to home in sites of inflammation following
tissue injury when injected intravenously. This involves their
capability of migrating across endothelial cell layers and
being attracted to and retained in the ischemic tissue but
not in the remote or intact tissue. Although the mechanisms
driving this property are not fully understood, it is likely
that injured tissues express specific receptors or ligands that
facilitate trafficking, adhesion, and infiltration of MSCs to
the damaged site, similarly to leukocytes [50, 51]. It is well
known that chemokines are released after tissue damage
and that migratory direction follows the chemokine density
gradient. In this regard, it has been recently demonstrated
that MSCs express chemokine receptors and ligands that
are involved in leukocyte migration during inflammation,
including the stromal-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) chemokine
receptor (chemokine (C-X-Cmotif) receptor 4, CXCR4) that
stimulates the recruitment of progenitor cells to the site of
tissue injury [52–55]. MSCs also express several adhesion
molecules that respond to SDF-1, as well as chemokines,
such as CX3CL1, CXCL16, CCL3, CCL19, and CCL21
[56–58]. Hence, the increase of inflammatory chemokine
concentration at the site of inflammation is a key mediator
of MSC trafficking to the site of injury [52]. In addition,
many integrins, selectins, and chemokine receptors involved
in the tethering, rolling, adhesion, and transmigration of
leukocytes have also been reported to be expressed on MSCs.
In particular, E- and P-selectin, CD44, and VCAM-1, which
function in leukocyte adhesion, have been shown to be
functionally important in the adhesion of MSCs to the
endothelium [59–61].
The therapeutic role of MSCs has been investigated us-
ing either autologous or allogeneic transplantation of cells,
which were previously expanded in culture and then intro-
duced intravenously or directly into the tissue of interest. To
date, infusion of MSCs has shown encouraging results in the
treatment of several immune- and inflammatory-mediated
conditions including GVHD, diabetes, and ulcerative colitis
and in the protection of solid organ grafts from rejection
[62]. Recent experimental studies have shown the successful
application of MSC transplantation in the treatment of
fulminant hepatic failure (FHF), end-stage liver disease
(ESLD), and inherited metabolic disorders (IMDs). These
studies have shown that MSC tran
本文档为【Therapeutic implications of mesenchymal stem cells in liver injury】,请使用软件OFFICE或WPS软件打开。作品中的文字与图均可以修改和编辑,
图片更改请在作品中右键图片并更换,文字修改请直接点击文字进行修改,也可以新增和删除文档中的内容。
该文档来自用户分享,如有侵权行为请发邮件ishare@vip.sina.com联系网站客服,我们会及时删除。
[版权声明] 本站所有资料为用户分享产生,若发现您的权利被侵害,请联系客服邮件isharekefu@iask.cn,我们尽快处理。
本作品所展示的图片、画像、字体、音乐的版权可能需版权方额外授权,请谨慎使用。
网站提供的党政主题相关内容(国旗、国徽、党徽..)目的在于配合国家政策宣传,仅限个人学习分享使用,禁止用于任何广告和商用目的。