首页 功率MOSFET基础:理解和质量因子相关的MOSFET特性

功率MOSFET基础:理解和质量因子相关的MOSFET特性

举报
开通vip

功率MOSFET基础:理解和质量因子相关的MOSFET特性 AN605 Vishay Siliconix Document Number: 71933 08-Sep-03 www.vishay.com 1 Power MOSFET Basics: Understanding MOSFET Characteristics Associated With The Figure of Merit Jess Brown, Guy Moxey INTRODUCTION Power MOSFETs have become the standard choice as...

功率MOSFET基础:理解和质量因子相关的MOSFET特性
AN605 Vishay Siliconix Document Number: 71933 08-Sep-03 www.vishay.com 1 Power MOSFET Basics: Understanding MOSFET Characteristics Associated With The Figure of Merit Jess Brown, Guy Moxey INTRODUCTION Power MOSFETs have become the standard choice as the main switching device for low-voltage (<200 V) switchmode power-supply (SMPS) converter applications. However using manufacturers’ datasheets to choose or size the correct device for a specific circuit topology is becoming increasingly difficult. The main criteria for MOSFET selection are the power loss associated with the MOSFET (related to the overall efficiency of the SMPS) and the power-dissipation capability of the MOSFET (related to the maximum junction temperature and thermal performance of the package). This application note focuses on the basic characteristics and understanding of the MOSFET. There are several factors which affect the gate of the MOSFET, and it is necessary to understand the fundamental basis of the device structure before the MOSFET behavior can be explained. This application note details the basic structure of the Trench MOSFET structure, identifying the parasitic components and defining related terminology. It also describes how and why the parasitic parameters occur. With a large variety of topologies, switching speeds, load currents, and output voltages available, it has become impossible to identify a generic MOSFET that offers the best performance across the wide range of circuit conditions. In some circumstances the on-resistance (rDS(on)) losses dominate, and in others it is the switching losses of the transient current and voltage waveforms, or the losses associated with driving the gate of the device. It also has been shown1,2 that the input and output capacitances can be the dominant loss. INTRODUCING THE FIGURE OF MERIT FOR MOSFET SELECTION To add to this confusion, device manufacturers specify MOSFET parameters at different static and dynamic conditions, diminishing designers’ ability to compare like for like. Therefore, the only true method of making the correct MOSFET choice is to compare a selection of devices within the circuit in which the MOSFET will be used. There are methods available that, though sometimes difficult to implement, enable the designer to compare MOSFETs that appear suited for a given application. One method for evaluating MOSFETs is according to “figure of merit.” In its simplest form, the figure of merit compares gate charge (Qg) against rDS(on). The result of this multiplication relates to a certain device technology, which is effectively scalable to achieve the required rDS(on) or Qg . However, the lower the rDS(on) the higher the gate charge will be. A similar method for comparing devices is the “Baliga high-frequency figure of merit,” BHFFOM1, which assumes that the dominant switching loss will be associated with the charging and discharging of the input capacitance (Ciss). A third method uses the “new high-frequency figure of merit,” NHFFOM2, which assumes that the dominant switching loss is due to the charging and discharging of the output capacitance (Coss). The latter two methods are geared towards the applications in which the MOSFETs will be implemented. However, these methods only allow like-for-like comparisons; they do not enable the user to determine that a device with one figure of merit is necessarily better than a different device with another. Figure 1 shows the Qg x rDS(on) figure of merit for a sample of Vishay Siliconix’s range of 30-V SO-8 n-channel MOSFETs. The Si4888DY, for example, may be better in certain switching applications than the Si4842DY, but it is not possible to use this graph—or other graphs using more complex figures of merit—to determine objectively the best device for a specific application. FIGURE 1. Typical figure of merit for Vishay Siliconix n-channel, 30-V SO-8 MOSFETs r D S (o n) ( � ) Gate Charge (nC) � Siliconix VGS = 4.5 V 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Si4886 Si4888 Si4880 Si4842 Si4872 Si4822 Si4874 Si4420 Si4442 Si4430 1. IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 10, No. 10, October 1989, “Power Semiconductor Device Figure of Merit for High Frequency applications,” B. Jayant Baliga. 2. Proc. of 1995 Int. Sym. on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, Hokohama, “New Power Device Figure of Merit for High-Frequency Applications,” IL-Jung Kim, Satoshi Mastumoto, Tatsuo Sakai, and Toshiaka Yachi. AN605 Vishay Siliconix www.vishay.com 2 Document Number: 71933 08-Sep-03 MOSFET STRUCTURE Table 1 identifies the common definitions of the majority of the MOSFET parameters and parasitics found in a Trench MOSFET. TABLE 1 Definitions of MOSFET Parameters ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ Symbol ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ Description ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ RB ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ Base resistance ÁÁÁÁ Rg ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ Gate resistance internal to the MOSFET ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ Cgs ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ Capacitance due to the overlap of the source and channel regions by the polysilicon gate. Independent of applied voltage. ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ Cgd ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ Consists of two parts: 1.. Associated with the overlap of the polysilicon gate and the silicon underneath in the JFET region. Independent of applied voltage. 2.. The capacitance associated with the depletion region immediately under the gate. Non-linear function of voltage. This provides a feedback loop between the output and input circuit. It is called the Miller Capacitor because it causes the total dynamic input capacitance to become greater than the sum of the static capacitors. ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ Cds ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ Capacitance associated with the body drift diode. Varies inversely with the square root of the drain source bias. ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ BVDSS ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ Voltage at which the reverse-biased body drift diode breaks down and a significant current starts to flow between source and drain by the avalanche multipication process, while the gate and source are shorted together. This is normally measured at 250-�A drain current. ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ rDS(on)ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ On-state resistance for Trench. Equals RSOURCE + RCH + RA + RD + Rsub + Rwcl ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ RSOURCE ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ Source diffusion resistance ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ RCH ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ Channel resistance ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ RA ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ Accumulation resistance ÁÁÁÁ RJ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ JFET component resistance ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ RD ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ Drift-region resistance ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ Rsub ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ Susbtrate resistance ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ Rwcl ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ Bond wire, contact and leadframe resistance (significant in low-voltage devices) ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ gfs ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ Transconductance, a measure of the sensitivity of drain voltage to changes in gate-source bias. Normally quoted for a VGS that gives a drain current equal to 1/2 of maximum current and for VDS that ensures operation in the constant-current region. Note: gfs is influenced by gate width, which increases in proportion as cell density increases. Reduced channel length is beneficial to both gfs and rDS(on). ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ Ciss ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ Input capacitance. Equals Cgs + Cgd with Cds shorted. ÁÁÁÁ Crss ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ Reverse transfer capacitance, Cgd ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ Coss ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ Output capacitance. Equals Cds + Cgd ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ Qg ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ Total gate charge. The amount of charge consumed by the capacitance of gate ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ Qgs ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ Gate source charge. The charge consumed by the gate source capacitance. ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ Qgd ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ Gate drain charge. The charge consumed by the gate drain capacitance. The foundations of any power MOSFET device can be derived from the vertical planar DMOS technology. Currents emanating from the source flow laterally along the surface, then turn and flow in a perpendicular direction away from the surface between adjacent body diffusions, through the epitaxial drain, into the substrate, and out of the wafer backside. The channel is formed under the polysilicon gate layer along the planar surface. However, the planar structure has an effective finite level of cell density because the JFET pinch-off effect3 leads to an increased device on-resistance, compared with the Trench structure, at very high cell densities. With such electrical and geometric restrictions, further increases to planar DMOS cell density above 30 million cells/inch2 are not only unwarranted, but also likely to be detrimental to performance. Only by eliminating the pinching effect can cell reductions significantly benefit MOSFET on-resistance. To overcome the planar pinch-off problem, device designers at Vishay Siliconix implemented the trench-gate vertical power MOSFET, or TrenchFET�. Rather than conduct current along the surface, the TrenchFET conducts via a channel formed vertically along the sidewall of a trench etched into the silicon. A Trench DMOS cross-section is shown in Figure 2. Using a closed cell pattern similar to that of planar DMOS, the trench forms a grid surrounding islands of silicon. Each silicon island is the location of a double diffused channel region and its associated source diffusion. The trench is oxided, then filled with a conductor and planarized to form the device gate. With this trench technology, it is feasable to increase the cell density without any JFET pinch-off effects, and as such, high cell densities (>200 million cells/inch2) are achievable. It is beneficial to have incremental steps up to this level of cell density, thereby creating a family of devices balancing ultra-low on-resistance, gate characteristics, and cost. However, the increase in die per wafer, which improves cost benefits, and reduction in rDS(on), which improves performance, remain the two most compelling advantages. Figure 3 shows a cross-section of the MOSFET Trench die at a density of 178 million cells/inch2. This is a slice through the actual ultra-high-density cell wafer in an area that demonstrates the high-density cell scaling. To achieve such a cell figure, the focus has been placed on both the lateral and vertical cell scaling, optimizing not only the rDS(on) but also the gate characteristics. Along with advances in lateral scaling designed to increase the cell density, there also have been improvements in the associated capacitance, Figure 3b, to enhance fast switching, which is essential for high-frequency operation (>400 kHz). Also at light current loads, the gate drive losses become a significant contributing factor to the overall system efficiency, so the gate capacitances must be taken into consideration. The vertical scaling improvements have achieved lower capacitance, resulting in lower merit values of rDS(on) x Qg of <100 (m� x nC). 3. “A Fivefold Increase in Cell Density Sets the New Milestone in TrenchFET� Device Performance,” G. Moxey and M. Speed. PCIM, 2001. AN605 Vishay Siliconix Document Number: 71933 08-Sep-03 www.vishay.com 3 FIGURE 2. Trench DMOS 3D cross-section, with associated resistive elements. Gate Interconnect Source Interconnect Spreading Epi Substrate Drain Interconnect P-Body N+ N++Gate P-Body N-Epi N-Sub Drain a) TrenchFET Power MOSFET Cross Section b) Trench Vertical DMOS Components of Resistance Channel Source FIGURE 3. Ultra-high-density die cross-section with equivalent parasitic parameters a) b) rDS Body rDSrDS rDS Drain Source GateGate Cgs Cgs Cgd Cgd The on-resistance of the DMOS Trench MOSFET is the sum of all the individual regions through which the mobile carriers must flow (as shown in Figure 2). (1)rDS(on) = RSOURCE + RCH + RA + RD + Rsub + Rwcl It should be noted that for a Planar MOSFET, the rDS(on) figure also includes the JFET component resistance. PARASITIC CAPACITANCE IN A MOSFET The simplest view of an n-channel MOSFET is shown in Figure 4, where the three capacitors, Cgd, Cds, and Cgs represent the parasitic capacitances. These values can be manipulated to form the input capacitance, output capacitance, and transfer capacitance, as described in Table 1. Drain Source Gate Drain CDS npn Source CGD CGS Gate FIGURE 4. Simple equivalent circuit for a n-channel MOSFET, showing the parasitic capacitance, npn transistor and Rb resistor. RG RB AN605 Vishay Siliconix www.vishay.com 4 Document Number: 71933 08-Sep-03 FIGURE 5. Gate-drain capacitance over the drain-source voltage range Turn-On Turn-Off CDG CDG(on) CDG(off) VGS = VDS VDS FIGURE 6. Gate voltage and respective voltage and current during turn-on VDS Miller Plateau Current Gate Voltage However, it should be noted that because the equivalent circuit is much more complex than a resistor and three capacitors, these capacitances may only be used for understanding the behavior of the switching transients. The gate-drain capacitance Cgd and the gate-source capacitance Cgs are voltage-dependent capacitances, and therefore the capacitance value changes depending on the voltage that appears across the drain source and also across the gate source of the device. The change in Cgd is more significant than Cgs, simply because the voltage that appears across it is much larger than that seen across Cgs. The change in Cgd4, shown in Figure 5, can be as large as a factor of 100 and usually is approximated to two static values. These changes in capacitance have an influence on the voltage that appears at the gate of the device, called the Miller Plateau4. This causes the turn-off and turn-on rise and fall times on the switching transients and causes the gate voltage to “flatten out” as shown in Figure 6. CONCLUSIONS This application note is the first in a series of technical documents describing the basic characteristics and operating performance of the power MOSFET when implemented in a switched-mode power supply. It is intended to give the reader a thorough background on the device technology behind Vishay Siliconix MOSFETs. The FOM does not in itself enable the power supply designer to choose the ideal device, but does give an overview of the device technology and possible performance. To give a definitive and subjective analysis, every FOM would have to be modified to include information on the application in which the MOSFET was to be used. Therefore the application note defines the principle characteristics (Table 1), which need to be taken into account when choosing the correct device for a specific application. 4. “Power Electronics, converters, Applications and Design,” Mohan, Underland and Robbins. ISBN 0-471-58404-8.
本文档为【功率MOSFET基础:理解和质量因子相关的MOSFET特性】,请使用软件OFFICE或WPS软件打开。作品中的文字与图均可以修改和编辑, 图片更改请在作品中右键图片并更换,文字修改请直接点击文字进行修改,也可以新增和删除文档中的内容。
该文档来自用户分享,如有侵权行为请发邮件ishare@vip.sina.com联系网站客服,我们会及时删除。
[版权声明] 本站所有资料为用户分享产生,若发现您的权利被侵害,请联系客服邮件isharekefu@iask.cn,我们尽快处理。
本作品所展示的图片、画像、字体、音乐的版权可能需版权方额外授权,请谨慎使用。
网站提供的党政主题相关内容(国旗、国徽、党徽..)目的在于配合国家政策宣传,仅限个人学习分享使用,禁止用于任何广告和商用目的。
下载需要: 免费 已有0 人下载
最新资料
资料动态
专题动态
is_315853
暂无简介~
格式:pdf
大小:99KB
软件:PDF阅读器
页数:4
分类:
上传时间:2012-04-27
浏览量:32