关闭

关闭

封号提示

内容

首页 The Authority of Law.pdf

The Authority of Law.pdf

The Authority of Law.pdf

上传者: slbnju 2011-12-10 评分 4.5 0 70 10 320 暂无简介 简介 举报

简介:本文档为《The Authority of Lawpdf》,可适用于高等教育领域,主题内容包含THEAUTHORITYOFLAWEssaysonLawandMoralityBYJOSEPHRAZOXFORDUNIVERSITYPRESSGre符等。

THEAUTHORITYOFLAWEssaysonLawandMoralityBYJOSEPHRAZOXFORDUNIVERSITYPRESSGreatClarendonStreet,OxfordOXDPOxfordUniversityPressisadepartmentoftheUniversityofOxfordItfurtherstheUniversity'sobjectiveofexcellenceinresearch,scholarship,andeducationbypublishingworldwideinOxfordNewYorkAthensAucklandBangkokBogotáBuenosAiresCalcuttaCapeTownChennaiDaresSalaamDelhiFlorenceHongKongIstanbulKarachiKualaLumpurMadridMelbourneMexicoCityMumbaiNairobiParisSãoPauloSingaporeTaipeiTokyoTorontoWarsawwithassociatedcompaniesinBerlinIbadanOxfordisaregisteredtrademarkofOxfordUniversityPressintheUKandincertainothercountriesPublishedintheUnitedStatesbyOxfordUniversityPressInc,NewYorkJosephRazThemoralrightsoftheauthorhavebeenassertedDatabaserightOxfordUniversityPress(maker)FirstpublishedAllrightsreservedNopartofthispublicationmaybereproduced,storedinaretrievalsystem,ortransmitted,inanyformorbyanymeans,withoutthepriorpermissioninwritingofOxfordUniversityPress,orasexpresslypermittedbylaw,orundertermsagreedwiththeappropriatereprographicsrightsorganizationEnquiriesconcerningreproductionoutsidethescopeoftheaboveshouldbesenttotheRightsDepartment,OxfordUniversityPress,attheaddressaboveYoumustnotcirculatethisbookinanyotherbindingorcoverandyoumustimposethissameconditiononanyacquirerBritishLibraryCataloguinginPublicationDataDataavailableLibraryofCongressCataloginginPublicationDataRaz,JosephTheauthorityoflawLawandethicsITitle'BJISBNPbkPrintedinHongKongContentsPREFACEPartI:LawandAuthority:LEGITIMATEAUTHORITY*THEPARADOXESAMETHODOLOGICALDETOURTHESIMPLEEXPLANATIONFIRSTOBJECTIONTOTHESIMPLEEXPLANATIONSECONDOBJECTIONTOTHESIMPLEEXPLANATIONNORMATIVEPOWERPOWERANDAUTHORITYREFUTINGTHEOBJECTIONSDISSOLVINGTHEPARADOXES:THECLAIMSOFLAWPartII:TheNatureofLawandNaturalLaw:LEGALPOSITIVISMANDTHESOURCESOFLAW*THENATUREOFLEGALPOSITIVISMTHESOCIALTHESISTHESOURCESOFLAWLEGALREASONS,SOURCES,ANDGAPS*PROFESSORDWORKIN'SREFUTATIONOFPOSITIVISMSOURCESANDLAWSLEGALGAPS:THEIDENTITYOFLEGALSYSTEMS*THEPROBLEMISOLATEDTHEPROBLEMCLARIFIEDTHEINSTITUTIONALNATUREOFLAW*INTRODUCTIONPRIMAIRYINSTITUTIONSTHELIMITSOFLAWTHEUNIQUENESSOFLAWTHEIMPORTANCEOFLAW:KELSEN'STHEORYOFTHEBASICNORM*EXPLAININGTHEDOCTRINETHEBASICNORMANDTHEUNITYOFLEGALSYSTEMSKELSENONNATURALLAWTHEORIESTHEBASICNORMANDAVALUEFREESTUDYOFLAWKELSENONTHENATUREOFTHENORMATIVITYOFLAWANINDIVIDUAL'S'POINTOFVIEW''THELEGALPOINTOFVIEW'CONCLUSION:LEGALVALIDITY*ITSNATURESYSTEMICVALIDITYSTATEMENTSFROMAPOINTOFVIEWVALIDITYANDPOSITIVISMPartIII:InternalLegalValues:THEFUNCTIONSOFLAW*SOCIALFUNCTIONSOFTHELAWPRIMARYFUNCTIONSSECONDARYANDINDIRECTFUNCTIONSONHLAHART'SCLASSIFICATIONOFLAWS:LAWANDVALUEINADJUDICATION*THEPROBLEMREGULATEDDISPUTESDISTINGUISHINGREGULATEDDISPUTESOVERRULINGREGULATEDDISPUTESCLOSURERULESUNREGULATEDDISPUTESJUDICIALLAWMAKINGANDLEGISLATIONCONSERVATIVERESTRAINTSANALOGICALREASONINGTHECONTINUITYOFAPPLYINGANDMAKINGLAW:THERULEOFLAWANDITSVIRTUE*THEBASICIDEASOMEPRINCIPLESTHEVALUEOFTHERULEOFLAWTHERULEOFLAWANDITSESSENCESOMEPITFALLSPartIV:MoralAttitudestotheLaw:THEOBLIGATIONTOOBEYTHELAWTHECHARACTEROFTHEOBLIGATIONMORALREASONSTOOBEYPRUDENTIALREASONSTOOBEYGOODLAWWITHOUTANOBLIGATIONTOOBEY:RESPECTFORLAWAPARADOXICALCLAIMFRIENDSHIP:ANANALOGYRESPECTFORLAW:THEANALOGYTHEWORTHOFRESPECT:ARIGHTTODISSENTICIVILDISOBEDIENCEFORMSOFDISSENTCOMMONPHILOSOPHICALATTITUDESTOCIVILDISOBEDIENCEARIGHTTOPOLITICALPARTICIPATIONCIVILDISOBEDIENCEINALIBERALSTATE:ARIGHTTODISSENTIICONSCIENTIOUSOBJECTIONCONSCIENCEANDRESPECTFORPERSONSCONSCIENCEANDTHEPURPOSEOFLAWFREEDOMOFCONSCIENCEANDARIGHTTOOBJECTPREFACEThelawclaimsourallegianceandobedienceEverylegalsystemclaimsauthorityButwhatauthorityhasthelawoverusWhatauthorityshouldweacknowledgeasduetothelawThisisthemainquestionthisbookattemptstoanswerWhatkindofananswercanphilosophyprovideUnrealisticexpectationsattheoutsetareboundtoleadtounjustifieddisappointmentThequestionisofgreatpracticalimportanceinsomanyaspectsofdailylifeItsimportanceisgrowingasthelawpenetratesmoreandmoreintoeverycornerofsocialandindividualactivityButthedeeperthelaw'spenetrationintovariousaspectsoflifethemorecomplextheproblemoftheauthorityoflawbecomesandthemoreonedespairsofthepossibilityofageneralphilosophicalanswertoitConsideranymaninanyofalargenumberofrathercommonsituationsConsider,forexample,aheadmasterobjectingtotheroutingofabypassnearhisschoolHowshouldhebehaveShouldheconfinehimselftopresentinghiscaseinthelocalpublicinquiryOrshouldhetrytodisrupttheinquirysinceheknowsthatitis,bylaw,weightedagainsthiscauseShouldheorganizeamassivelocalsitinOrchoosesomeothercourseofactionSincesomanyconsiderationshavetobetakenintoaccount,theircombinationmaywellmakethecaseuniqueThenatureoftheharmtheimplementationoftheproposedplanwillcause,thebenefitsitwillbring,thechancesofhavingitchangedbythevariouspossiblecoursesofactionopentohim,thedangerthatitwillbereplacedbyaworseplan,thecostofhisactiontotheschoolintermsofreputation,affecting,forexample,possibilitiesofraisingmoneyfromoldmembers,itsimpactonhisstandingintheeyesofhisstudents,itsconsequencestohispersonalandfamilylifedophilosophersreallyexamineorneedtoexaminealltheseconsiderationsTheanswermustbebothyesandnoThedifficultyofeachindividualcasearisesbecauseoftheparticularwayinwhichgeneralconsiderationscombineinitPhilosophicaldeliberationhelpstodeterminewhichgeneralconsiderationsarerelevanttopracticaldecisionsanditimprovesourunderstandingoftheirvalueandimportanceThisunderstandingismostvaluableformakinginformeddecisionsinconcretecases,butitisinsufficientTheactualdecisionmustbebasedoncomplexjudgmentsaboutthewaythesegeneralconsiderationsmanifestthemselvesinthecaseathand,andabouttherightwaytoresolveconflictsbetweenthemPhilosophycanprovideguidance,butitishelplesstospareusanyoftheagonyoftheactualdecisionLegalphilosophyprovidesonlyonepartofthephilosophicalanswertopracticalquestionsClearlyeachconcreteprobleminvolvesmanyotheraspectsaswellThesemaybediscussedbyotherdepartmentsofthephilosophyofpracticalreasonLegalphilosophyitselfisconcernedonlywiththelegalangleofallpracticalproblems,namelywiththewayinwhichthefactthatacertainactionhassomelegalconsequencesshouldaffectpracticaldeliberationgenerallyandmoralconsiderationsinparticularThisisthequestionoftheauthorityoflawThebookisdividedintofourpartsThesecondandthirdprimarilycriticizevariousattemptstoestablishaconceptualconnectionbetweenlawandmoralitywhichensuresaninescapablemoralauthoritytothelawThelastpartprovidesaconstructiveargumentestablishingthecharacterofthelaw'smoralauthorityandcontributing(thoughonlytoolittle)totheperennialquestionoftheconditionsthelawmustsatisfytobedeservingofmoralrespectThefirstpartprovidesanintroductiontotheargumentofthebookbysupplyingaphilosophicalanalysisoftheconceptoflegitimateauthorityThisanalysisispresupposedinthelastconstructivepart,especiallyintheessaysentitled'TheObligationtoObeytheLaw'and'RespectforLaw'Thisisfollowedbyseveralessaysrefuting,directlyandbyimplication,avarietyoftraditionalnaturallawargumentsSomeoftheseargumentsattempttoshowthatourcriteriaforidentifyingwhatislawandwhatisnotassurethelawofmoralcontentEssay('LegalPositivismandtheSourcesofLaw')explainsthereasonsforrejectinganyapproachtothelawwhichassumesthatthedeterminationofthelegalvalidityofanystandardofconductinvolvesamoralargumentEssay('LegalReasons,Sources,andGaps')exploressomeoftheconsequencesofthealternativeapproach,generallyknownas'legalpositivism',whichregardslawascreatedbysocialsourcessothattheexistenceandcontentoflegalsystemscanbedeterminedonthebasisofsocialfactwithoutresorttomoralargumentThisessaydefendsthesourcebasedconceptionoflawfromaccusationsofincoherenceandexplainswhyandinwhatsensealllegalsystemscontaingapscallingfortheexerciseofdiscretionandforrelianceonextralegalconsiderationsbycourtsincertaincasesThesourcebasedconceptionoflawisthendescribedingreaterdetailinthefifthandsixthessayson'TheIdentityofLegalSystems'and'TheInstitutionalNatureofLaw'Sincetheprimaryaimofthebookistoexamineargumentsforthemoralauthorityoflaws,thediscussionofthepictureoflawwhichemergesfromthepursuitoflegalpositivismhasnotbeencarriedveryfarForamorecompletelyarticulatedanddefendedexplanationthereaderisreferredtothelasttwochaptersofmyPracticalReasonandNorms(London,)Oneofthemainstumblingblocksforlegalpositivistshasbeentheuseofnormativelanguage,ietheverysameterminologywhichisusedinmoraldiscourse,inlegaldiscourseThefactthatthelawisdescribedandanalysedintermsofduties,obligations,rightsandwrongs,etc,haslongbeenregardedbymanyassupportingtheclaimofthenaturallawyerthatlawisinescapablymoralThebestpositivistexplanationoftheuseofnormativelanguageinlawwassuggestedbyKelsenandisdiscussedintheseventhessayTheeighth('LegalValidity')offersanoutlineofanaccountoflegaldiscourselargelyderivedfromKelsenbutfree,Ihope,frommanyofhisobscurities,anddissociatedfromotheressentiallyunrelatedKelseniandoctrinesThesecondpartofthebookdoesnotadvanceusfartowardsshowingthatlawhasmoralauthorityItrejectsonekindofargumenttothateffectandintheprocessitdefendsaviewofthenatureoflawandoflegaldiscourseThethirdpartissimilarinnaturethoughlessunifiedroundacentralthemeItisconcernedwiththerefutationofthreepopularargumentsFirst,thatanunderstandingoflawinevitablyinvolvesanunderstandingofitsfunctionsandthosecannotbedescribedexceptinamorallyloadedwayFromthisvariousconsequencesaboutthemoralityoflawareoftenallegedtofollowEssayoffersanindirectrefutationbyshowinghowlegalfunctionscanbeanalysedinvalueneutraltermsSecondistheargumentthatsincelegaladjudicationdoesandshouldinvokemoralargument,lawcannotbeseparatedfrommoralityThisargumenthasalreadybeenrefutedintheessayon'LegalReasons,Sources,andGaps',whichestablishesthepossibilityofconceptuallyseparatinginageneralwaylawandvalueinadjudicationEssay('LawandValueinAdjudication')examinestheadjudicativeprocessmorecloselyandexploresthethemeoftheseparabilityandconnectednessoflawandvalueinthecourtroomFinally,theargument(mostcloselyconnectedwithLonFuller)thattherearecertainproceduralvaluesinseparablefromthelawwhichformitsinternalmoralityisexaminedintheeleventhessayon'TheRuleofLawanditsVirtue'andisseentoguaranteenoinherentmoralvaluetothelawThesecondandthirdpartsofthebookaredevotedtoarefutationofsomenaturallawargumentsfortheauthorityoflawItremainstothelastparttodevelopaviewoftheauthorityoflawconsistentwithlegalpositivismThoughsomenaturallawargumentsareconsistentwithlegalpositivism(seePracticalReasonandNorms,ch),IhavetriedtoexplaininEssaythateventheyfailtoestablishthemoralauthorityoflawTheresultisthatonecannotexplainwhylawhasmoralauthorityItmayhavenoneIfacertainlegalsystemhasmoralauthoritythiscannotbejustaresultofitsstatusaslaworoffeaturesentailedbyitslegalaspectItmustbaseitsmoralclaimonsubstantivefeatureswhichithas,butwhichitispossibleforalegalsystemtolackHencetherealquestioniswhatshould

类似资料

编辑推荐

超级漫画素描技法-基础篇(林晃).pdf

多丽丝·莱辛:另外那个女人.pdf

微信公众平台注册流程和使用技巧.ppt

物理化学复习知识点.pdf

Foundations of differential geometry Vol 2.pdf

职业精品

精彩专题

上传我的资料

精选资料

热门资料排行换一换

  • 东亚南部民族史.pdf

  • 白话本国史-吕思勉-下.pdf

  • 妙境长老瑜伽师地论笔录卷7.DOC

  • 【名家通识讲座】现代性与后现代性…

  • 中国学者论民主与法治 俞可平.p…

  • 新维生素圣典2.实用指导篇--[…

  • 02S701砖砌化粪池标准图集(…

  • 简明 X86 汇编语言教程.pdf

  • 何海波编:《人权二十讲》.pdf

  • 资料评价:

    / 283
    所需积分:1 立即下载

    意见
    反馈

    返回
    顶部