PUBLIC HEALTH PAST AND PRESENT
Analysis of social epidemiology research on infectious
diseases: historical patterns and future opportunities
Justin M Cohen, Mark L Wilson, Allison E Aiello
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
See end of article for
authors’ affiliations
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Correspondence to:
Allison E Aiello, Department
of Epidemiology, Center for
Social Epidemiology and
Population Health, University
of Michigan School of Public
Health, 109 South
Observatory Street, Ann
Arbor, MI 48109-2029,
USA; aielloa@umich.edu
Accepted 17 April 2007
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
J Epidemiol Community Health 2007;61:1021–1027. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.057216
Background: Despite the many triumphs of biomedical research over infectious diseases, human pathogens
continue to impact profoundly populations deprived of social resources. Correspondingly, health researchers
have advocated a social determinants approach to the study and prevention of infectious diseases. However,
it is unknown whether this call has resulted in an increase in the number of studies examining social
determinants of infectious outcomes.
Methods: Research on social determinants of infectious diseases was systematically quantified by assessing
temporal trends in the published literature using MEDLINE, PsycINFO and ISI Web of Science.
Results: Results of the literature review spanning 1966–2005 show that socially related citations increased an
annual average of 180.3 for neuropsychiatric conditions, 81.9 for chronic conditions, 44.7 for sexually
transmitted diseases and 18.9 for non-sexually transmitted infectious diseases (p,0.0001). Of the 279
publications found to employ the term ‘‘social epidemiology’’, 15 (5.4%) investigated infectious outcomes.
Conclusions: The results of the literature review suggest a paucity of social research on infectious diseases.
There is a need for increased dialogue and collaboration between infectious disease epidemiologists and
social epidemiologists.
R
ecent publications in the epidemiology literature have
called for an evolution of theory and practice that would
move the field from a focus on proximate, independent
risk factors toward new paradigms of distal, interconnected
determinants of disease risk. Example frameworks include
‘‘eco-epidemiological’’ constructions of nested systems,1 socio-
economic foundations of health,2 predisposing childhood
exposures3 and fundamental causes.4 The case for moving from
identification of individual risk factors to broader population
and societal-level contextual determinants of risk has been well
argued in the literature4–8 and is an underlying motivation for
much of the research in the field of social epidemiology.4
Explicitly or implicitly, the need for such discussions has been
driven by the aetiological complexity of chronic diseases.8 9
The importance of social factors as causes of disease has been
well established.10 Indeed, questions of social causation of disease
have been asked throughout the history of public health.11 The
ubiquitous association between socioeconomic status and health
has been described,4 if not wholly explained;12 the decrease in
morbidity and mortality with increasing socioeconomic position is
one of the most consistent relationships in epidemiology.13 A key
difference identified by some social epidemiologists in their
frameworks for understanding disease processes has been the
focus on social conditions that promote or harm health, rather
than on specific health outcomes.11 14 It has been argued that such
inclusiveness is required by the fact that all diseases can be
considered to be products of both biological and social processes.15
In practice, however, social epidemiology has focused historically
on exploring aetiologies of non-infectious diseases. For example,
in a review of social epidemiology, Renaud defines it as a ‘‘field of
inquiry that regards the role of social and psychological factors in
the etiology of chronic diseases’’, 16 while McQueen concurs that
social epidemiology is ‘‘a term which has recently come into favor
to describe research concerned with social factors in the etiology of
chronic disease’’. 17
It is clear that social, political, behavioural and environ-
mental factors shape the emergence and re-emergence of
infectious diseases.18 19 Farmer19 has discussed the role of social
inequalities in the recent emergence of infections such as Ebola,
AIDS and tuberculosis. Despite proven successes of biomedical
research in discovering cures and treatments for many
infectious diseases, human pathogens continue to emerge or
re-emerge today and profoundly impact populations deprived
of social resources. For these reasons, Farmer and others have
advocated a social determinants approach to the study and
prevention of infectious diseases at the population level.19–21
However, we hypothesised that most infectious disease
research focuses largely on the proximate causes of the disease
of interest (ie, microbial pathogens), at the expense of more
thorough consideration of various types of distal contributors to
the causal pathway. To test this hypothesis, we undertook a
systematic review in order to quantify and summarise social
constructs that have been examined as predictors of epidemio-
logical studies of infectious diseases. In particular, we
examined this hypothesis by assessing temporal trends in the
international scientific literature on social causation of infec-
tious disease outcomes indexed in major publication databases,
such as MEDLINE and ISI Web of Knowledge.
METHODS
Three different search strategies were undertaken for this
review. First, we conducted a search to provide a comprehen-
sive list of studies that used the term ‘‘social epidemiology’’ and
then cross-classified these articles by specific disease outcomes.
Secondly, a search strategy was used to obtain studies based on
specific social determinant key words (see table 1) and these
studies were then cross-classified with specific disease out-
comes. Our final search strategy was used to identify literature
review articles on social determinants of health outcomes to
assess the frequency of reviews that focus on social determi-
nants of infectious disease outcomes. Each of these specific
search strategies is described in detail below.
Social epidemiology key word search
We queried MEDLINE, PsycINFO and ISI Web of Science for all
publications between 1966 and 2005 containing the term
1021
www.jech.com
‘‘social epidemiology’’ in the titles, abstracts or keywords. The
year 1966 was chosen as it marks the beginning of the inclusion
of abstracts in the MEDLINE database. This search follows, but
expands upon, an earlier exploration by Kaplan.22 To examine
whether infectious disease research was included in ‘‘social
epidemiology’’ literature, all results that had an English
language abstracts were subsequently categorised according to
specific health outcomes. Each abstract was read and outcomes
were classified (by J.M.C.) into one of three groups: ‘‘non-
infectious’’ (including ‘‘chronic’’ diseases and neuropsychiatric
conditions among others), ‘‘infectious’’ (recognised microbe
that is transmissible and considered the proximal causal agent)
or ‘‘other’’ (literature not focused on a particular outcome).
While recognising the false division of this classification (many
‘‘chronic’’ diseases are known to be associated with microbial
infections, and infectious diseases may be chronic), these
categories proved useful for comparative purposes. In the cases
where the subject of inquiry was an infectious aetiology of a
chronic disease, we chose to be conservative vis-a`-vis our
hypothesis, and classified the study into the infectious disease
category.
Social determinants and disease outcomes search
Because research dealing with social factors may not self-
identify as ‘‘social epidemiology’’, a second literature search
utilised MEDLINE subject headings to compile articles gen-
erally discussing socially related factors from 1966 to 2005. We
combined all citations indexed under socially relevant subject
headings listed in table 1. To examine the health outcomes
studied, we looked for citations cross-classified by MEDLINE as
addressing some of the most important disease outcomes from
worldwide morbidity and mortality estimates in the World
Health Report (2002).23 For comparison, we grouped these
searches into neuropsychiatric conditions, non-sexually trans-
mitted infectious diseases and sexually transmitted infectious
diseases categories (table 1).
Reviews of social determinants and disease search
MEDLINE classifies each article in its database under numer-
ous subject headings but highlights a few headings that
indexers deem especially important with ‘‘focus’’ labels. To
identify review articles specifically examining social determi-
nants of health outcomes, we used MEDLINE and the ‘‘focus’’
option to return only those articles that MEDLINE classified as
especially relevant to socially related subject headings, then
additionally limited those results to review articles with
abstracts. Abstracts are only available in MEDLINE beginning
in 1975, so citations before that year were not considered.
Because the ‘‘focus’’ option does not automatically include
subheadings, we specified a search encompassing any article
indexed as focusing on the headings in table 1 and included the
potentially relevant subheadings of ‘‘poverty’’, ‘‘income’’,
‘‘social class’’, ‘‘employment’’, ‘‘housing’’, ‘‘community net-
works’’, ‘‘social support’’, ‘‘civil disorders’’, ‘‘human rights
abuses’’, ‘‘juvenile delinquency’’, ‘‘needle sharing’’, ‘‘race
relations’’ or ‘‘urbanisation’’. Abstracts were used (by J.M.C.)
to classify the resulting reviews that considered possible effects
of social factors on occurrence of specific disease outcomes.
Reviews of neuropsychiatric outcomes were excluded because
social factors were often the outcomes as well as exposures of
interest in such articles. Additionally, reviews of subjects not
related to human health outcomes (eg, behaviours or policies)
and the effects of social factors on medical care, treatment
success or recovery were excluded.
RESULTS
Social epidemiology key word search
This search strategy returned 279 citations that used the term
‘‘social epidemiology’’. Our review of identified abstracts
revealed that 40 (14.3%) of these reports did not focus
specifically on health outcomes, and that 102 (36.6%) involved
general discussions of social epidemiology, such as methodo-
logical discussions or analyses of all-cause mortality. The
remaining 137 citations addressed the social epidemiology of
various health outcomes. Fifteen of these 137 studies (10.9%)
focused specifically on infectious diseases, 11 of which involved
HIV/AIDS.24–34 The other four relevant infectious disease
citations discussed gonorrhoea,35 36 varicella infection37 and
measles.38
The temporal trend in social epidemiology research, plotted
as the cumulative number of publications by year (fig 1A), and
as the number of publications per each 5-year period (fig 1B) of
publication, was similar to that published by Kaplan.22
However, the number of studies specifically dealing with
infectious diseases rose more slowly compared with non-
infectious diseases.
Studies examining social determinants and disease
outcomes
Socially relevant subject headings contained 403 935 refer-
ences. Although the chronic disease category had the largest
number of publications in general (fig 2A), a higher number of
neuropsychiatric citations were cross-referenced under socially
related subject headings (fig 2B). The infectious disease
category represented the smallest body of literature overall, as
well as within socially related subject headings. Specifically,
26 792 chronic disease citations were cross-referenced under
socially related subject headings (0.9% of all chronic disease
citations from that period). Similarly, citations for 69 437
neuropsychiatric conditions (or 11.8%), 13 573 sexually
Table 1 MEDLINE headings used to investigate quantities of articles referenced as dealing with social factors
Socially related MEDLINE
headings
MEDLINE headings, by disease category
Non-infectious Infectious
Socioeconomic factors* Neuropsychiatric Chronic Sexually transmitted Non-sexually transmitted
Residence characteristics Mental disorders Heart diseases HIV infections Respiratory tract infections
Social environment Substance-related disorders Neoplasms Sexually transmitted diseases Diarrhoea
Social conditions Cerebrovascular disorders Hepatitis B Tuberculosis
Social change Pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive Malaria
Social problems Digestive system diseases Poliomyelitis
Social welfare Measles
Diptheria
Pertussis
Tetanus
* Encompasses other important subheadings, including ‘‘poverty’’, ‘‘income’’, ‘‘employment’’ and ‘‘social class’’.
1022 Cohen, Wilson, Aiello
www.jech.com
transmitted disease (6.2%) and 6307 non-sexually transmitted
infectious diseases (2.1%) were cross-referenced under socially
related subject headings. Each year, on average, the socially
related, sexually transmitted infectious disease literature
increased by 44.7 citations, as compared with only 18.9
citations for non-sexually transmitted infectious disease. Both
of these infectious disease categories were superseded by
annual increases of 180.3 citations for neuropsychiatric condi-
tions and 81.9 citations for chronic conditions.
Review articles on social determinants and disease
The search for socially relevant review articles returned 2455
citations. Our classification of the articles by the specific
outcomes of interest (eg, ‘‘obesity’’, ‘‘asthma’’ or ‘‘tuberculo-
sis’’) resulted in the identification of 162 reviews published
between 1975 and 2005 that discussed the role of social factors
in determining risk of specific disease outcomes. Among these
reviews, cardiovascular outcomes, cancers and obesity were
most represented, with 46 (28.4%), 25 (15.4%) and 20 (12.3%)
review articles, respectively (fig 3). Infectious disease outcomes,
including infectious aetiologies of chronic conditions,
accounted for 44 reviews (27.2%). Of these, only two were
systematic reviews.39 40 The majority of the identified review
articles focused on HIV/AIDS. The types of social factors
discussed in these reviews are depicted in table 2.
DISCUSSION
The three search strategies employed here were designed to
examine critically the body of literature indexed in major
publication databases exploring the role of social factors in
causation of infectious diseases. The first search identified
articles using the key words ‘‘social epidemiology’’. These
results demonstrated that the quantity of such publications has
grown rapidly over the last three decades (fig 1), but also
revealed that infectious diseases are largely absent from this
body of literature. Of the 137 articles discussing the ‘‘social
epidemiology’’ of specific diseases, 15 addressed infectious
diseases, and only three of those discussed diseases other than
HIV/AIDS. This initial search demonstrated only a small body of
infectious disease research within the broad domain of ‘‘social
epidemiology’’. It is possible that some articles that would have
fallen under the rubric of ‘‘social epidemiology’’ did not utilise
this term. For these reasons, we conducted several other search
strategies.
We found that the lowest number of citations among all
health outcomes that were cross-referenced under headings
related to social factors was for non-sexually transmitted
infectious diseases (fig 2B). However, it is difficult to draw
conclusions from this finding since the non-sexually trans-
mitted infectious diseases category also contained the fewest
citations in general (fig 2A). The very large number of
MEDLINE citations for all non-sexually transmitted infectious
disease (n = 6307) made it impossible to evaluate whether
each of these specific citations investigated the role of social
factors in disease causation, or whether these reports con-
sidered the reverse effects of diseases on social or economic
outcomes. The breadth of this search made it highly sensitive to
social determinant research by including all research reports
discussing the role of social factors in disease causation, but it
was not specific; articles that dealt with social factors
tangentially or examined the effect of diseases on social
outcomes were also included.
Figure 1 (A) Cumulative number of
references to ‘‘social epidemiology’’, by
year, in titles, abstracts or key words of
publications on MEDLINE, PsycINFO and ISI
Web of Science from 1996 to 2005. Papers
focusing on specific health outcomes were
classified into ‘‘infectious’’ or ‘‘chronic’’
categories,* while articles not focusing on
specific disease outcomes are classified as
‘‘other’’. (B) Number of citations for ‘‘social
epidemiology’’ in each category by 5-year
period. Only citations from 1966 onward
were included in the first 5-year interval.
Social determinants of infectious diseases 1023
www.jech.com
Issues such as the ambiguous causal directionality of
returned citations could not be resolved through quantitative
MEDLINE searches alone. The large number of citations
(403 935) cross-referenced under the subject headings in
table 1 made it logistically impossible to examine individually
whether each report dealt with the role of social factors in
influencing disease risk. Therefore, our third strategy involved
evaluation of review articles. We chose to assess the topic of
review articles as a search strategy for several reasons. First,
review articles generally are designed to provide a summary of
the current state of the research.81 Second, reviews of the
scientific literature have the potential to be used for answering
Figure 2 (A) Number of citations per year
indexed in MEDLINE from 1966 to 2005
under subject headings related to important
non-infectious, neuropsychiatric, infectious
or sexually transmitted diseases. (B) Number
of citations in the same disease categories
additionally cross-referenced with subject
headings related to social factors
Figure 3 Number of review articles
indexed in MEDLINE under subject headings
related to social factors specifically involving
social causation of disease, as of November
2005. Chronic disease outcomes are in blue
and infectious disease outcomes are in red.
1024 Cohen, Wilson, Aiello
www.jech.com
relevant policy questions, and for decision making in public
health and medicine.82 83 Interestingly, our search resulted in
only 44 reviews discussing the effects of social factors on
infectious diseases, of which 15 involved reviews of HIV/AIDS,
and only two of these appeared to use a systematic search
methodology (ie, using an explicit search methodology fol-
lowed by appraisal of resulting articles). The paucity of
available review articles involving infectious diseases other
than HIV/AIDS supports the contention that such diseases are
rarely studied in the context of social determinants. Given that
systematic reviews generally aim to synthesise existing research
and define future research agendas,84 further studies that
examine trends in the topics of review articles that focus on
infectious disease outcomes are needed.
Like most systematic reviews, this investigation encompassed
only literature indexed in large indices of publications
commonly searched by biomedical researchers. MEDLINE
indicates that it contains citations from approximately 5000
journals worldwide in 37 languages,85 with about 22% of its
citations having non-English abstracts.86 Databases such as
MEDLINE include only the most internationally visible
本文档为【Analysis of social epidemiology research on infectious】,请使用软件OFFICE或WPS软件打开。作品中的文字与图均可以修改和编辑,
图片更改请在作品中右键图片并更换,文字修改请直接点击文字进行修改,也可以新增和删除文档中的内容。
该文档来自用户分享,如有侵权行为请发邮件ishare@vip.sina.com联系网站客服,我们会及时删除。
[版权声明] 本站所有资料为用户分享产生,若发现您的权利被侵害,请联系客服邮件isharekefu@iask.cn,我们尽快处理。
本作品所展示的图片、画像、字体、音乐的版权可能需版权方额外授权,请谨慎使用。
网站提供的党政主题相关内容(国旗、国徽、党徽..)目的在于配合国家政策宣传,仅限个人学习分享使用,禁止用于任何广告和商用目的。