1
Energy
Management
Standards
(EnMS)
Paul Scheihing
U.S. DOE
January, 2009
2
Why an Energy
Management Standard?
Most energy efficiency in industry is achieved through
changes in how energy is managed in a facility,
rather than through installation of new technologies;
An energy management standard provides a method
for integrating energy efficiency into existing industrial
or commercial management systems for continuous
improvement;
All existing and planned energy management
standards are compatible with ISO 9000/140001;
Companies who have voluntarily adopted an energy
management plan (a central feature of an EnMS –
Standard) have achieved major energy intensity
improvements2.
1 International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
2 Btu/lb of product
ANSI Accredited U.S. TAG to ISO/PC 242
3
Business Benefits
Implementation of an energy management
plan assists a company to:
Develop a baseline of energy use
Actively manage energy use and costs
Reduce emissions without negative effect on
operations
Continue to improve energy use/product output
over time
Document savings for internal and external use
(e.g. emission credits)
ANSI Accredited U.S. TAG to ISO/PC 242
Energy Management
Results
Companies who have used energy management to
achieve major energy intensity improvements
include:
• Dow Chemical achieved 22% improvement ($4B
savings) between 1994 and 2005, and is now seeking
another 25% from 2005 to 2015
• United Technologies Corp reduced global GHG
emissions by 46% per dollar of revenue from 2001 to
2006, and is now seeking an additional 12% reduction
from 2006 to 2010
• Toyota’s North American (NA) Energy Management
Organization has reduced energy use per unit by 23%
since 2002; company-wide energy-saving efforts have
saved $9.2 million in NA since 1999.
1 Btu/lb of product
4ANSI Accredited U.S. TAG to ISO/PC 242
Components of an Energy
Management
Standard(EnMS)
Typical features include:
1. A strategic plan that requires
measurement, management, and
documentation for continuous improvement
for energy efficiency;
2. A cross-divisional management team led
by a representative who reports directly to
management and is responsible for
overseeing the implementation of the
strategic plan;
3. Policies and procedures to address all
aspects of energy purchase, use, and
disposal;
Continued
5ANSI Accredited U.S. TAG to ISO/PC 242
Components of an
EnMS Standard
4. Projects to demonstrate continuous
improvement in energy efficiency;
5. Creation of an Energy Manual, a living
document that evolves over time as additional
energy saving projects and policies are
undertaken and documented;
6. Identification of key performance
indicators, unique to the company, that are
tracked to measure progress; and
7. Periodic reporting of progress to
management based on these measurements
6ANSI Accredited U.S. TAG to ISO/PC 242
Energy Management Principles
Bridge management and technology. Technology alone cannot achieve
optimal savings, but when coupled with O&M practices, as well as,
management systems can lead to significant savings.
Commitment by upper level management
Development of management strategies
Clearly stated goals on energy efficiency, waste reduction, and
sustainability
Communication of goals, tactics, and achievements throughout all levels
of the firm
Delegation of responsibility and accountability to the appropriate
personnel
Sustained tracking and assessment of energy use and technology
application
Continuous investigation of potential energy reduction projects
Application of business investment models to energy technology projects
Establishment of an internal recognition and reward program for achieving
energy goals.
Energy Management Resources
Energy Quick Start
www.energyquickstart.org
Combines DOE, EPA and NIST energy
efficiency program resources in one
website
Energy Management Resources,
continued
Georgia Tech Management System for
Energy: ANSI/MSE 2000:2008
http://innovate.gatech.edu/Default.aspx?tabid=2005
http://www.mse2000.net/Default.aspx?base
Wisconsin Focus on Energy “Practical Energy
Management”
http://www.focusonenergy.com/Business/Edu
cation-and-Training/Practical_Energy.aspx
10
ANSI/ MSE 2000:2008
www.ansi.org
ANSI Accredited U.S. TAG to ISO/PC 242
Standard Revised for 2008!
Create broader stakeholder representation on
Consensus Board: U.S. Industry, DOE, EPA
Energy Star, NIST, Consultants
Expand Ownership
of Potential Users
Increase Implementation
MSE 2000 Recent
Developments
Energy Management
Standards
Current Status
• Several countries already have national energy
management standards (Denmark, Ireland,
Sweden, US, Thailand, Korea)
• Energy management standards are under
development in China, Spain, Brazil, and
European Union
• ISO has initiated work on an international
energy management standard (2008-2011),
with preparatory assistance from the United
Nations Industrial Development Organization
(UNIDO)
UNIDO Support for
ISO EM Standard
March 2007, United Nations Industrial Development
Organization (UNIDO) hosted the first meeting to
put forward the idea of an energy management
standard
July- September 2007, initiated a program to foster
coordination between developing and developed
countries for the development of an international
standard for energy management
• Regional meetings (9/07-Kanchanaburi, Thailand; 8/08-
Sao Paulo, Brazil)
• Conducting a survey of industry and standards authority
in several regions to provide input to ISO standard
13
Beijing Working
Group Meeting
April 2008, UNIDO and the Standardization
Administration of China (SAC) hosted meeting in
Beijing to facilitate harmonization of existing national
standards:
• 58 energy management and standards experts from 14
countries participated, including the leadership
organizations for PC 242, UNIDO, and ISO Secretariat
• Key Input: Summary Comparison of National Energy
Management Standards prepared by Georgia Tech and
LBNL as US contribution to the meeting
• Key Output: UNIDO/SAC Framework for Action
Key Findings in
Framework for Action
Develop the standard quickly
Should be broadly applicable to all types of organizations
• Industrial, commercial, institutional, large residential, and
transportation sectors.
• To maximize the impact of the ISO MSE in emerging economies,
the initial implementation focus should be on industry.
• The role of entities such as government, consultants, designers,
equipment suppliers, and educational and financial institutions in
affecting implementation will also need to be considered.
Must be usable by Small and Medium Size Enterprises
(SMEs)
Participation in the standards development process by
representatives from developing countries and emerging
economies is essential
16
ISO 50001- Energy
Management System
Scope (From the New Work Item Proposal)
Standardization in the field of energy
management, including:
energy supply,
procurement practices for energy using
equipment and systems,
energy use, and
any use-related disposal issues.
The standard will also address measurement of
current energy usage, and implementation of a
measurement system to document, report, and
validate continuous improvement in the area of
energy management.
ANSI Accredited U.S. TAG to ISO/PC 242
ISO Project
Committee 242
September 8-10, 2008, 1st PC 242 Meeting in
Arlington, VA
90 participants from 25 countries from all regions of
the world, as well as UNIDO, which has liaison
status
Participating countries have existing activities on
energy management and strong interest in
developing a harmonized international standard
Key decision to base standard on the common
elements found in all of ISO’s management system
standards (e.g. 9001, 14001) to ensure maximum
compatibility
Two-year accelerated schedule to have ISO 50001
ready for publication by the end of 2010
17ANSI Accredited U.S. TAG to ISO/PC 242
ISO/PC 242
MEMBER COUNTRIES
PARTICIPATING (33) and Observing (6) COUNTRIES
Argentina (IRAM)
Australia (SA)
Barbados (BNSI)
Belgium ( NBN )
Brazil (ABNT)
Canada (SCC)
Czech Republic ( CNI )
Chile (INN)
China (SAC)
Denmark ( DS)
Ecuador ( INEN )
Finland (SFS)
France (AFNOR)
Germany (DIN)
Ireland (NSAI)
Israel ( SII )
Italy ( UNI )
Japan (JISC)
Kazakhstan ( KAZMEMST )
Korea, Republic of (KATS)
Malaysia ( DSM )
Mauritius ( MSB )
Netherlands (NEN)
Nigeria ( SON )
Pakistan (PSQCA)
Poland (PKN)
Portugal (IPQ)
Saint Lucia (SLBS)
Singapore (SPRING SG)
South Africa (SABS)
Spain (AENOR)
Sweden (SIS)
Switzerland ( SNV )
Thailand (TISI)
Tunisia (INNORPI)
Turkey (TSE)
United Kingdom (BSI)
USA (ANSI)
Zimbabwe (SAZ)
18ANSI Accredited U.S. TAG to ISO/PC 242
US Technical Advisory
Group (TAG)
Objectives of the US TAG
Represents the US through ANSI on ISO PC
242
To develop the US position at ISO PC 242
International Meetings
Participation in US TAG is open to all
energy management experts.
See Superior Energy Performance website
of how to join US TAG
www.superiorenergyperformance.net
19ANSI Accredited U.S. TAG to ISO/PC 242
Challenges ahead
Inertia –ISO 9001 or ISO 14001 conformance
offers an advantage
Management needs to support this approach
Baseline needs to be established, processes
and controls developed
For some customers this is a new way of
managing and evaluating their business
Infrastructure is not in place to support
customers and confirm conformance
20ANSI Accredited U.S. TAG to ISO/PC 242
Supportive National
Policies for EnMS
In all countries with existing standards:
Energy management standards are voluntary1
Programs target large industrial plants
Technical assistance is available
Case studies are used to publicize benefits
Provide recognition for outstanding performers
1 Mandatory for selected large facilities in Thailand
Supportive National
Policies for EnMS
In addition, most countries:
Offer financial incentives for compliance, usually
as part of a target-setting agreement1
Provide training on standards compliance
Provide opportunities for companies to network
and learn from each other
Several countries also offer system optimization
training
1 typically energy or carbon dioxide tax relief
ISO EnMS
Standard and EE
This standard will allow companies to
become more competitive nationally and
internationally.
Improved energy performance
Green Marketing
Customer demand
U.S. Stakeholders in Energy Services can
use this as an opportunity to market EE
programs to their customers
Collaboration of industry,
government, and non-profit
organizations
Seek to improve the
energy intensity of U.S.
manufacturing through
a series of initiatives.
Guide development of
the Superior Energy
Performance program
Superior Energy Performance
Steering Committee
Foster an organizational culture
of continuous improvement in
energy efficiency in U.S.
manufacturing facilities
Develop a transparent system
to validate energy intensity
improvements and management
practices
Create a verified record of
energy source fuel savings and
carbon reductions with potential
value in national and international
markets
Superior Energy Performance
Program Strategy
Certifying Organizations
for Professionals (TBD)
Standards & Protocols
Superior Energy Performance
Program Infrastructure
ISO 50001
Energy Management
Standard
System Assessment
Standards
Measurement &
Verification
Protocol
Certified SEP
Program Validators
System Assessment
Practitioners
Energy
Management
Practitioners
Participating
SEP program
Manufacturing
Plants
Save Energy Now:
A Resource for Success
Superior Energy
Performance Program
Participants establish energy management
system that complies with ISO 50001 and
meet other SEP program requirements
Plant Assistance
Strengthens corporate support
for energy management program
Plant energy management &
system optimization tools
Training and assessments by
Certified Practitioners
Helps individual
manufacturing plants
improve energy
management and
intensity
performance
28
Contact
Information
Paul Scheihing
Program Manager, US DOE
Superior Energy Performance partnership steering committee member
paul.scheihing@ee.doe.gov
202-586-7234
Bill Meffert
Manager, Energy & Sustainability Services
Georgia Institute of Technology
404-894-3844
email: bill.meffert@innovate.gatech.edu
To track status of ISO 50001 energy management standard
www.superiorenergyperformance.net
ANSI Accredited U.S. TAG to ISO/PC 242
Energy Management�Standards (EnMS)
Why an Energy Management Standard?
Business Benefits
Energy Management Results
Components of an Energy Management Standard(EnMS)
Components of an EnMS Standard
Energy Management Principles
Energy Management Resources
Energy Management Resources, continued
Slide Number 10
MSE 2000 Recent Developments
Energy Management Standards
UNIDO Support for ISO EM Standard
Beijing Working Group Meeting
Key Findings in Framework for Action
ISO 50001- Energy Management System
ISO Project Committee 242
ISO/PC 242 �MEMBER COUNTRIES
US Technical Advisory Group (TAG)
Challenges ahead
Supportive National Policies for EnMS
Supportive National Policies for EnMS
ISO EnMS Standard and EE
Superior Energy Performance�Steering Committee
Superior Energy Performance�Program Strategy
Superior Energy Performance�Program Infrastructure
Save Energy Now: �A Resource for Success
Contact Information
本文档为【ISO50001能源管理體系培訓】,请使用软件OFFICE或WPS软件打开。作品中的文字与图均可以修改和编辑,
图片更改请在作品中右键图片并更换,文字修改请直接点击文字进行修改,也可以新增和删除文档中的内容。
该文档来自用户分享,如有侵权行为请发邮件ishare@vip.sina.com联系网站客服,我们会及时删除。
[版权声明] 本站所有资料为用户分享产生,若发现您的权利被侵害,请联系客服邮件isharekefu@iask.cn,我们尽快处理。
本作品所展示的图片、画像、字体、音乐的版权可能需版权方额外授权,请谨慎使用。
网站提供的党政主题相关内容(国旗、国徽、党徽..)目的在于配合国家政策宣传,仅限个人学习分享使用,禁止用于任何广告和商用目的。