首页 ISO50001能源管理體系培訓

ISO50001能源管理體系培訓

举报
开通vip

ISO50001能源管理體系培訓 1 Energy Management Standards (EnMS) Paul Scheihing U.S. DOE January, 2009 2 Why an Energy Management Standard? ƒ Most energy efficiency in industry is achieved through changes in how energy is managed in a facility, rather than through installat...

ISO50001能源管理體系培訓
1 Energy Management Standards (EnMS) Paul Scheihing U.S. DOE January, 2009 2 Why an Energy Management Standard? ƒ Most energy efficiency in industry is achieved through changes in how energy is managed in a facility, rather than through installation of new technologies; ƒ An energy management standard provides a method for integrating energy efficiency into existing industrial or commercial management systems for continuous improvement; ƒ All existing and planned energy management standards are compatible with ISO 9000/140001; ƒ Companies who have voluntarily adopted an energy management plan (a central feature of an EnMS – Standard) have achieved major energy intensity improvements2. 1 International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 2 Btu/lb of product ANSI Accredited U.S. TAG to ISO/PC 242 3 Business Benefits Implementation of an energy management plan assists a company to: ƒ Develop a baseline of energy use ƒ Actively manage energy use and costs ƒ Reduce emissions without negative effect on operations ƒ Continue to improve energy use/product output over time ƒ Document savings for internal and external use (e.g. emission credits) ANSI Accredited U.S. TAG to ISO/PC 242 Energy Management Results Companies who have used energy management to achieve major energy intensity improvements include: • Dow Chemical achieved 22% improvement ($4B savings) between 1994 and 2005, and is now seeking another 25% from 2005 to 2015 • United Technologies Corp reduced global GHG emissions by 46% per dollar of revenue from 2001 to 2006, and is now seeking an additional 12% reduction from 2006 to 2010 • Toyota’s North American (NA) Energy Management Organization has reduced energy use per unit by 23% since 2002; company-wide energy-saving efforts have saved $9.2 million in NA since 1999. 1 Btu/lb of product 4ANSI Accredited U.S. TAG to ISO/PC 242 Components of an Energy Management Standard(EnMS) Typical features include: 1. A strategic plan that requires measurement, management, and documentation for continuous improvement for energy efficiency; 2. A cross-divisional management team led by a representative who reports directly to management and is responsible for overseeing the implementation of the strategic plan; 3. Policies and procedures to address all aspects of energy purchase, use, and disposal; Continued 5ANSI Accredited U.S. TAG to ISO/PC 242 Components of an EnMS Standard 4. Projects to demonstrate continuous improvement in energy efficiency; 5. Creation of an Energy Manual, a living document that evolves over time as additional energy saving projects and policies are undertaken and documented; 6. Identification of key performance indicators, unique to the company, that are tracked to measure progress; and 7. Periodic reporting of progress to management based on these measurements 6ANSI Accredited U.S. TAG to ISO/PC 242 Energy Management Principles ƒ Bridge management and technology. Technology alone cannot achieve optimal savings, but when coupled with O&M practices, as well as, management systems can lead to significant savings. ƒ Commitment by upper level management ƒ Development of management strategies ƒ Clearly stated goals on energy efficiency, waste reduction, and sustainability ƒ Communication of goals, tactics, and achievements throughout all levels of the firm ƒ Delegation of responsibility and accountability to the appropriate personnel ƒ Sustained tracking and assessment of energy use and technology application ƒ Continuous investigation of potential energy reduction projects ƒ Application of business investment models to energy technology projects ƒ Establishment of an internal recognition and reward program for achieving energy goals. Energy Management Resources ƒ Energy Quick Start www.energyquickstart.org Combines DOE, EPA and NIST energy efficiency program resources in one website Energy Management Resources, continued ƒ Georgia Tech Management System for Energy: ANSI/MSE 2000:2008 http://innovate.gatech.edu/Default.aspx?tabid=2005 http://www.mse2000.net/Default.aspx?base ƒ Wisconsin Focus on Energy “Practical Energy Management” http://www.focusonenergy.com/Business/Edu cation-and-Training/Practical_Energy.aspx 10 ANSI/ MSE 2000:2008 www.ansi.org ANSI Accredited U.S. TAG to ISO/PC 242 Standard Revised for 2008! ™ Create broader stakeholder representation on Consensus Board: U.S. Industry, DOE, EPA Energy Star, NIST, Consultants ™ Expand Ownership of Potential Users ™ Increase Implementation MSE 2000 Recent Developments Energy Management Standards Current Status • Several countries already have national energy management standards (Denmark, Ireland, Sweden, US, Thailand, Korea) • Energy management standards are under development in China, Spain, Brazil, and European Union • ISO has initiated work on an international energy management standard (2008-2011), with preparatory assistance from the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) UNIDO Support for ISO EM Standard ™ March 2007, United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) hosted the first meeting to put forward the idea of an energy management standard ™ July- September 2007, initiated a program to foster coordination between developing and developed countries for the development of an international standard for energy management • Regional meetings (9/07-Kanchanaburi, Thailand; 8/08- Sao Paulo, Brazil) • Conducting a survey of industry and standards authority in several regions to provide input to ISO standard 13 Beijing Working Group Meeting April 2008, UNIDO and the Standardization Administration of China (SAC) hosted meeting in Beijing to facilitate harmonization of existing national standards: • 58 energy management and standards experts from 14 countries participated, including the leadership organizations for PC 242, UNIDO, and ISO Secretariat • Key Input: Summary Comparison of National Energy Management Standards prepared by Georgia Tech and LBNL as US contribution to the meeting • Key Output: UNIDO/SAC Framework for Action Key Findings in Framework for Action ™ Develop the standard quickly ™ Should be broadly applicable to all types of organizations • Industrial, commercial, institutional, large residential, and transportation sectors. • To maximize the impact of the ISO MSE in emerging economies, the initial implementation focus should be on industry. • The role of entities such as government, consultants, designers, equipment suppliers, and educational and financial institutions in affecting implementation will also need to be considered. ™ Must be usable by Small and Medium Size Enterprises (SMEs) ™ Participation in the standards development process by representatives from developing countries and emerging economies is essential 16 ISO 50001- Energy Management System Scope (From the New Work Item Proposal) Standardization in the field of energy management, including: ƒ energy supply, ƒ procurement practices for energy using equipment and systems, ƒ energy use, and ƒ any use-related disposal issues. The standard will also address measurement of current energy usage, and implementation of a measurement system to document, report, and validate continuous improvement in the area of energy management. ANSI Accredited U.S. TAG to ISO/PC 242 ISO Project Committee 242 September 8-10, 2008, 1st PC 242 Meeting in Arlington, VA ƒ 90 participants from 25 countries from all regions of the world, as well as UNIDO, which has liaison status ƒ Participating countries have existing activities on energy management and strong interest in developing a harmonized international standard ƒ Key decision to base standard on the common elements found in all of ISO’s management system standards (e.g. 9001, 14001) to ensure maximum compatibility ƒ Two-year accelerated schedule to have ISO 50001 ready for publication by the end of 2010 17ANSI Accredited U.S. TAG to ISO/PC 242 ISO/PC 242 MEMBER COUNTRIES PARTICIPATING (33) and Observing (6) COUNTRIES ƒ Argentina (IRAM) ƒ Australia (SA) ƒ Barbados (BNSI) ƒ Belgium ( NBN ) ƒ Brazil (ABNT) ƒ Canada (SCC) ƒ Czech Republic ( CNI ) ƒ Chile (INN) ƒ China (SAC) ƒ Denmark ( DS) ƒ Ecuador ( INEN ) ƒ Finland (SFS) ƒ France (AFNOR) ƒ Germany (DIN) ƒ Ireland (NSAI) ƒ Israel ( SII ) ƒ Italy ( UNI ) ƒ Japan (JISC) ƒ Kazakhstan ( KAZMEMST ) ƒ Korea, Republic of (KATS) ƒ Malaysia ( DSM ) ƒ Mauritius ( MSB ) ƒ Netherlands (NEN) ƒ Nigeria ( SON ) ƒ Pakistan (PSQCA) ƒ Poland (PKN) ƒ Portugal (IPQ) ƒ Saint Lucia (SLBS) ƒ Singapore (SPRING SG) ƒ South Africa (SABS) ƒ Spain (AENOR) ƒ Sweden (SIS) ƒ Switzerland ( SNV ) ƒ Thailand (TISI) ƒ Tunisia (INNORPI) ƒ Turkey (TSE) ƒ United Kingdom (BSI) ƒ USA (ANSI) ƒ Zimbabwe (SAZ) 18ANSI Accredited U.S. TAG to ISO/PC 242 US Technical Advisory Group (TAG) Objectives of the US TAG ƒ Represents the US through ANSI on ISO PC 242 ƒ To develop the US position at ISO PC 242 International Meetings ƒ Participation in US TAG is open to all energy management experts. ƒ See Superior Energy Performance website of how to join US TAG www.superiorenergyperformance.net 19ANSI Accredited U.S. TAG to ISO/PC 242 Challenges ahead ƒ Inertia –ISO 9001 or ISO 14001 conformance offers an advantage ƒ Management needs to support this approach ƒ Baseline needs to be established, processes and controls developed ƒ For some customers this is a new way of managing and evaluating their business ƒ Infrastructure is not in place to support customers and confirm conformance 20ANSI Accredited U.S. TAG to ISO/PC 242 Supportive National Policies for EnMS In all countries with existing standards: ‰ Energy management standards are voluntary1 ‰ Programs target large industrial plants ‰ Technical assistance is available ‰ Case studies are used to publicize benefits ‰ Provide recognition for outstanding performers 1 Mandatory for selected large facilities in Thailand Supportive National Policies for EnMS In addition, most countries: ‰ Offer financial incentives for compliance, usually as part of a target-setting agreement1 ‰ Provide training on standards compliance ‰ Provide opportunities for companies to network and learn from each other ‰ Several countries also offer system optimization training 1 typically energy or carbon dioxide tax relief ISO EnMS Standard and EE ƒ This standard will allow companies to become more competitive nationally and internationally. ƒ Improved energy performance ƒ Green Marketing ƒ Customer demand ƒ U.S. Stakeholders in Energy Services can use this as an opportunity to market EE programs to their customers Collaboration of industry, government, and non-profit organizations ƒ Seek to improve the energy intensity of U.S. manufacturing through a series of initiatives. ƒ Guide development of the Superior Energy Performance program Superior Energy Performance Steering Committee ƒ Foster an organizational culture of continuous improvement in energy efficiency in U.S. manufacturing facilities ƒ Develop a transparent system to validate energy intensity improvements and management practices ƒ Create a verified record of energy source fuel savings and carbon reductions with potential value in national and international markets Superior Energy Performance Program Strategy Certifying Organizations for Professionals (TBD) Standards & Protocols Superior Energy Performance Program Infrastructure ISO 50001 Energy Management Standard System Assessment Standards Measurement & Verification Protocol Certified SEP Program Validators System Assessment Practitioners Energy Management Practitioners Participating SEP program Manufacturing Plants Save Energy Now: A Resource for Success Superior Energy Performance Program Participants establish energy management system that complies with ISO 50001 and meet other SEP program requirements Plant Assistance ƒ Strengthens corporate support for energy management program ƒ Plant energy management & system optimization tools ƒ Training and assessments by Certified Practitioners Helps individual manufacturing plants improve energy management and intensity performance 28 Contact Information Paul Scheihing Program Manager, US DOE Superior Energy Performance partnership steering committee member paul.scheihing@ee.doe.gov 202-586-7234 Bill Meffert Manager, Energy & Sustainability Services Georgia Institute of Technology 404-894-3844 email: bill.meffert@innovate.gatech.edu To track status of ISO 50001 energy management standard www.superiorenergyperformance.net ANSI Accredited U.S. TAG to ISO/PC 242 Energy Management�Standards (EnMS) Why an Energy Management Standard? Business Benefits Energy Management Results Components of an Energy Management Standard(EnMS) Components of an EnMS Standard Energy Management Principles Energy Management Resources Energy Management Resources, continued Slide Number 10 MSE 2000 Recent Developments Energy Management Standards UNIDO Support for ISO EM Standard Beijing Working Group Meeting Key Findings in Framework for Action ISO 50001- Energy Management System ISO Project Committee 242 ISO/PC 242 �MEMBER COUNTRIES US Technical Advisory Group (TAG) Challenges ahead Supportive National Policies for EnMS Supportive National Policies for EnMS ISO EnMS Standard and EE Superior Energy Performance�Steering Committee Superior Energy Performance�Program Strategy Superior Energy Performance�Program Infrastructure Save Energy Now: �A Resource for Success Contact Information
本文档为【ISO50001能源管理體系培訓】,请使用软件OFFICE或WPS软件打开。作品中的文字与图均可以修改和编辑, 图片更改请在作品中右键图片并更换,文字修改请直接点击文字进行修改,也可以新增和删除文档中的内容。
该文档来自用户分享,如有侵权行为请发邮件ishare@vip.sina.com联系网站客服,我们会及时删除。
[版权声明] 本站所有资料为用户分享产生,若发现您的权利被侵害,请联系客服邮件isharekefu@iask.cn,我们尽快处理。
本作品所展示的图片、画像、字体、音乐的版权可能需版权方额外授权,请谨慎使用。
网站提供的党政主题相关内容(国旗、国徽、党徽..)目的在于配合国家政策宣传,仅限个人学习分享使用,禁止用于任何广告和商用目的。
下载需要: 免费 已有0 人下载
最新资料
资料动态
专题动态
is_223340
暂无简介~
格式:pdf
大小:826KB
软件:PDF阅读器
页数:28
分类:生产制造
上传时间:2011-03-21
浏览量:216