1
����������
��
���������������
��
���������������
��
���������������
��
�����
������������
�����
��
��
�����
����
����
��
��
���� �����
�������� !"��� #
��
� #
��� #
��� #�����
�$%&'()*+,-�.(
)�/0
� 1����� 2345����
����
����
6789�:;� <=5
��>9?
@
��234�AB
A��
�B ����� 2�&'C(D��EF
AB
,?./0+@ABC0DEFGHIJ�
�KLAFMN0OPQ,$%%R(S�
2
(���Ë()
YZ[Ò
([n�<��*[���\���YZ[��§
�
���%tYZ['ëï��
A�
¡j(YZ[ !�"#�æ$$
%%
&ò�Ù'(¡)*
+¤ì ,-
Ç.
/N0Ð
1234
5
6�Ù8°a���
7Rì 8
9Ø@£\::����^;
���
��YZ[<�=8ì ;
¢£
�->-ì ��
Ç.
/N0Ð
1234*56��HI?@�ABC;��
YZDE*[�DEtF
\G
H#ì �I
JKL�ì ���-0@
�á-·Mñ^
@
®�§N»
��['�OPQ
�@
®�§NRS�I
KÒ�
S#HIèéTò
UVWX
æWj¡UVsY�ABvø�|}Z�A
Bvø [~H2�vA��
B
\#¢|}�A��
B~�IH]B
�¥��^~��
B�¥�_
`a~�]BA�AbÑ~�®�¦§cd
efgX]h
9~ABvø
�À��m��mti#jkgl�ì 0
÷��YZ[�m�
�h[
�
n\#11H0÷
No�®�¢£�pgD��[w�h
æ�q¹ºAr��
n¦§�
��I
RSsN�t!
vøo�uvw,0
�xyz
²-jk
{�E|�I
E|ñ^
E|z�
\]�^-0
-ñ^
Ç.
�Ù*®�|}�h���[n
w
}§NÎì ~
ì 2�[¼
uvD^)[w�ì \�~
RSì
�j(
#Gù� �Ù
�-��
12j(
ì 8Ǧ
»��
j(56n¡P�HI1Ù
^#¡¦§�
²��
��{
<� Ej(
á-ì
lN�
%äÊ+
��"[)Ø (Alberto O. Hirschman) �&'YZ
(World Politics) �&<£�g? ¡¢ (The Search for
Paradigms as a Hindrance to Understanding)
e�3·£He¤�ì W�¥�
g.�e¤
`V�1968ÊË(;¦#�N¬§¨©Ëª
«
N� John
Womack
¬®»¯�Ì°±(Zapata and the Mexican Revolution)
4cN
� James L. Payne
ÌÍÎÏ
²³´(Patterns of Conflict in Colombia).5 +
n�¬§¯�̵�>¶·¸¬®
¹º»+�Âná�¼½
ýÙ�¾¿¬
®
^*+�O#ÀÁ
åÂ����Ã
Ä
\®�b;ÅÆ�«�
)ÇÈ;¦,;¦�kn<É�ª?�Ân/
�ÊM*¢ËÌÍÎ
«
ÏÏÐÐÑ;#%ä0Ð
WÒC¤<�ÓÔH0Ð�¥!¶�
Æ;
,�0а�<#ÓÔ�p«ÂnÕ³^ªÖ
á�×Ø#
Å
3 Alberto O. Hirschman, “The Search for Paradigms as a Hindrance to Understanding,” World Politics, Vol.
22, No. 3 (April 1970), pp. 329-343.
4 John Womack, Zapata and the Mexican Revolution (New York: Knopf, 1968).
5 James L. Payne, Patterns of Conflict in Colombia (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968).
3
^°¦ �òt
Ù1t#ÌÍÎÏ
YZÚù�HN«��Û�ÜÝ
Þß
8[;¦,;¦
�àá�O
â
Wµã
kN«Î+N«äT��[
��å
� æØcIÃkâ·�
²æçXèéN«�ê
§ë�^ �¨©Ëª
#�/H¡â
�¨©Ëª
VW�ÌÍÎϼ
ì*íÂ<
Øî#+N«ï1�kN«�Ea<�ðñ{
òP
ó
N´®ôX��ÌÍÎÏYZ
Ø�6õ�Womack�«j®�>-|}��
1234
æ£�yö^�÷
»+
^ �A-øù¯�̵�°±
aú
=û
\-�ü�&'ÑW�týµ�°±
�7 ��Ù
êë
j(::?Z@�EA�.()
(authoritarianism)�8 ¢£�
H¡âB\"-§ïù�
�ÏCD�
�ÛYE�
FGH�*IP��j(í�(
æ12WYE�
J
Ç.nÖ�K(�H©
Ç.§�YZ12�|}LMN~sYW_
-OP�Q¹OP
�BC;��
Úù�X}R
�
!"�ÖS�TUÔV( a
j(#¡W()�XYWZ"Å#�[
\]^
W
8{Tí}Xê_�H���^�`
�
6 TUVWXYHZ,7[Y\]^_ `A Propensity to Self-Subversion (Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press, 1995).
7 ab,cdef./ghi j�� �� YklmnopqYrskStuYv,wxyzn{kY
C|@}=S
8 ~,w
Fdm-=.6���� ��� ��
���(SY0
|S�
4
Lucian Pye;¼�aH
¼bN§j(56
�_cÅ<Ë(YZ[-
-d
j(56n��e��
@"����efj?ö-¤�j(µ
µ�¡eµn0g#¡�h() (China is a civilization pretending to be
a nation-state)��*W��[nEa
j(}W
Tò�iW
jk
+
lÂá�1mxn#¤� H©E
/�[~Pye 0#
�]�$
���h()
/o��h�.
j(W
/oAA�e
�!�j(^>
�ª>
e�
��
�h() (4�pqg
q
�
����^
j(^
�h�.��rs#
�r~#)�
$ã
���h()
tu�vùwx�
Úù�
j(ÂIeµy
zÚù�
{N�9 PyeH|12\]�j(^}al�
æ��£
nnW~Ar
V���x;�
�h()
¶��h�.*Úù�
�¢£���
"Ôá�T
"Ô
���h()
§Äj
(8W
¹WN~¾�ÖT"Ôj;�
Ú
Ôü�¼½¾
¿XW�eµ
H�h[
øùN~10
!"1995Ê
ëË([na(Francis Fukuyama) ;¦#N8« ÖÅ�
ü&'Ñ,�()1�>¤vÖÅù()*2ÖÅù()�Ë(���
§+n
j(�#kn�Ë(�¥�vÖÅù()!�^8
11HfàL�&�MXj(
a
k®�Å/o
á�1��
!�+Ñ
j(�
56°�=\tµ
ª�&'Ñ8X
[()
j(�¡vÖÅù()�� InglehartÁ�
�&'OP5
6 1990Ê$üj(�ÌÍ�j
Æ;���?ÌÍ
ä¡()j
j(ªÖ8X[^PbÖÅ
Î=và1Vä
A§
A
Ñ$��Av§8X[$%&'()
\v§
Ë(�
8X[���()�H¡Æ;³ Inglehart8�
�
I
ÌÍ�;#¢£�
��
Á1993Ê
�FëN[n��>¢£�j(
�O#ÌÍ�
Æ;õ�Î InglehartÁ
�2
æ5�v§,�
��()* ��()Á���Á1996Ê
InglehartÁ�O#
�&'O
9 Lucian Pye, “China: Erratic State, Frustrated Society,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 69, No. 4 (1990), pp. 56-74.
10 �Edward Friedman FdY F¡¢£¤¥¦§¡S¨©Ysª
«ss¬M,[Y@®,@¯°±²³, [vªv0´µ¶·¸¹º»¼S Edward
Friedman, “Reconstructing China’s National Identity: A Southern Alternative to Mao-Era Anti-Imperialist
Nationalism,” Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 53, No. 1 (1994), pp. 67-91.
11 Aaron Xavier Fellmeth, “Social Capital in the United States and Taiwan: Trust or Rule of Law,”
Development Policy Review, Vol. 14, No. 2 (June 1996), pp. 151-171.
12 Ronald Inglehart, Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43
Societies (Princeton: Princeton University Press), p. 173.
13 Kazufumi Manabe, “People’s Attitudes Toward Technology and Environment in China,” Kwansei
Gakuin University Annual Studies, 1995.
5
PÌÍ
ä ¡()*tý
j(\��ÁH
Æ;»+
�
Æ;8>þ
5�<à1¡ä
j(^0
ªÖ8X[^
PbÖÅ���Áõ� InglehartÁ5�ÙÄj(^:�v
ÖÅù
æ!�
xy�I
[/�¢£#�ì»TÂn�¢�ÊÂ
ÌÍã£
�<à
1%ä
j(¤¥¦�ªÖ,-Ñ8X[^PbÖÅ�H¡Î=Î+å
ÌÍÆ;2bX
�l�Vì
ÌͶ
´�Vj(
,-ÖÅ
!�§¨L©���Á�¢äÊ�
Ë(
,-ÖÅ\ª«#]X���Á�Y¨}
0
�à1%ä
^,-Ñ8X[^PbÖÅ
H�&'Ñ5�§
vÖÅù()�a|}-Ö¬®~Inglehart|}�ñ
¯/�
xy
��xyj([/
¦°�~HsY°» ±²jóü³´���
¬�-��E&'
¨}-�E5{[~Á
!"0X��
¡����O
���
j(YE!öX#^�
µi
¶
J#W·Y
!���NaYE�X8GùÑÛ�!���¡¢£�á
0
®�/Ö¬
¸�¹#��['
8º�æWX��[n
»��\j( ¼^lÂ
i��½¾¾×Ú
2�¦§¿b
^�
À�V�
j½YE®�!����Á
®3�;£/�
æ�
ÂËj([nÆ_Ã
ÄÅ
ÆÇ-8È
[/µ
H¡�O
EÙ�ÉÊ
���Á¦Ë
�
�§
��»�O
���ä
W56
Æ;�ÌÍ,?GwQY
ôõAQö÷Y¡øJ��KLAKLFMN0ùúÖ×û,$%%&(,����'üRý'&üS
6
c
zN*é�
\ê¶N��
2�ò
�§á�å���
�ê
ë���*zN�¶���
\oà]ê¶N���¶��^\]
-0
^¬¨}§���¶[~ìíÚ^¬���¶�_"t.
�
Ñ
ê¶Nî(���¶ÎÇc*zN����d
ÅÆ�íXä¢&ï
ð
ãä&ïñ
�^¬�¶
ÚsYÎ�Çc*zN�¶
Ú�Sb
X�
�
Ái�^¬���¶i�ÅÆm=
���^Ev§�E *�"�
��
£jo�.
|}��['n��.��[~H¡¹¸Xè
�òS#
´�óôS#
~
!"âk¡=
\»��E&'
¹¸�¬�ÐÑk
��v<
´�òÓ
Ô
²��� ����§�##YZ[j
9Ø@£�æ��� ::?
�õX¾Z
`<Á»Gö��¼
R§^��¥t!§�)Â�<ãb�
·�#�:÷øøùÊ
Ë(;#�ú�û�üý=
t�þM��
�k
`YE
å®EX©
56����g
�
���,�
()
Gö����°§�a�^�»��������
¼Á
K
ôÁ»:�Ú�
Hô()¼���()*tý
HI����
a
7R��YE�ø»��
�¨ê�
�;��
t¼
8´,-²
³Á»�%�
ÏËêÏ
����
�ù��ϼ
¯^Q�.� »^��
+�¼�|}-;�H©
Tò~Gö���
T��|}~á
0
t!¬v��
^�Aop¬v��
"
\o¬v��
JÈ
¬v�RJ��
]i�ÑÁ=
;#WPb56
¢£¤:�|
}]iL
¾��OGö������ Å*�Q!
~�]i�#�
"
L
|}©
Úù�Ð�,#
Å$~æ���H©¢ãb�YZÑ
�!¶
V����56/NÑ#Hä1¬%
¢£��
Âj(
[n
ò&ÒK°j(YZÚù
ÅÆÅ$
ì n�§�H¢£' (
v�
Ñò
=
0µ
WX¢£�����YZ[jg�X)�:;¾�-��
124��
á-³ì ��#
�&'öX;*���
j([n
�WX¢£\®��#
)�;9�[~ìE
;9sY�§�+,ù-
jÃgl
�.3��YZ[/1
>�
0NùØW¹¸
v1WT�
-
19 John Torpey, The Invention of the Passport: Surveillance, Citizenship and the State (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2000),
20 Cþ,�vÄ�cd� Robert D. Kaplan �nªM�,Ý “Was Democracy Just a
Moment? The Atlantic Monthly, Vol. 280, No. 6, pp. 55-80�[YfM����n+k The Coming
Anarchy: Shattering the Dream of the Post-Cold War (New York: Random House, 2000)�{k�^
çn
�Y�},./0
���������OY²³S
7
ì Ãt
.9�j(*&'
YZ��ORS�
wæ�H¡
YZO
:;/o (²,�^°��
,Â,�
�#³�I
ê<â8�)
V�¦
t÷
e�
-aÄC(
�C¡�=f
CIY
ZO�21£�`a8[n�
e::
¶�¸£h[e
VWZÙï
#[[Ï*�>��<
XY�`a8a?@@
5�WX[n�A�
B�
�^Ã0
RSXº+C
�`a´®�Xh[
ò�22 �^
�� t
;
�`a��h[
�Igl"øD��A®�
e
�
E�No2�Ë(t�e�
�23
Ñ
��`a56 +
[n F!�G¡óN�
¢£¤
YZ[�®�¦§(#h[~H¡GsY´-HIL=�ÖNJ(Ontology)
9ùE
¡[h�#h[34ï!%¡]i�$
W56��K;8�
D$ã
p56�LM
ÚD$%
HÚ�NO
�-V
56n
O*56Æ;
PQ�¼(��YZ[56
��¥4�Htu
[~
$¡]iã��ï!
�YZ��K;8�
��YZ[nRST1;
a
�æ$ã*$%¡]i2lÂ` ï!#��NJ
g.Ñ
C(YZXè
�>J´��,@þ~Ö��YZ;a
,U�Ú �¥>©"-§
��
()~� ^(�����^
æ\
�� )^
��e�2�&'
e
�
�������.��^>
*NO
OP
��()Ø#5��
Q9 \2ñ�`a��H^Ea
��
ê_2�$%&'
µ_
Ò�
21 Robert H. Bates, “Area Studies and the Discipline: A Useful Controversy?” PS, Political Science &
Politics, Vol. 30, No. 2 (June 1997), pp. 166-169. �� Robert H. Bates, et al, Analytic Narratives
(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).
22 � Donald P. Green and Ian Shapiro, Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications
in Political Science (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994)
23 Chalmers Johnson, “Preconception vs. Observation: On the Contributions of Rational Choice Theory and
Area Studies to Contemporary Political Science,” PS, Political Science & Politics, Vol. 30, No. 2 (June
1997), pp. 170-174.
8
Z
�Ù
^>,-÷-VÓï>
ÖOP3D*ÚùWÑD��EF���
�
/§æç��YZb;
�Ú ��"-§,�()
²³ê_�"-
:�_-"-�HIEÙ»FÊ��¹Xü�/YXEÙ>;�
A�IÖ
Z!
n��[Ñ#\]]
[�^_�`ab (Samuel P. Huntington)
�
�RÑcD::d$%&'�e1
æRS�¡��I;¸��|}'(
^�
@0f#
��øbgh�ii^
��^\�r���
eµ²³
Ñ!"j£
��eµ�>»W�eµ
CIeµ�-ï>���¨}-�eµ
²³[~ka
ce¤úû£º2Z@���¤Ãt
��
&
�24 `ab
EÙ
ª�§W�()
��<=�Ãt
���Ãt
Nk�Ãt
�&'ï><��Êl
��
u0
mn
���X
èÃt�éo[~`abÑ<#�]¤"e�
/YX¹W
ôªK
pE»
YE
1q
ÙZ
Xr�.»Ï�,-
�stÚ
¡^�.�H�]1
a
E
å®�]�Ãt
�æ�]�#
WJ
^�º
� "V
�ºN
¦ Ö :
"Ôj�
O[wD �A-?¶tÂ;?o
\-�¶Â;`a�
?o�*`
aÒt°��î÷
�^
HtJ³bYZj
V;¬Òä1M�
\³b��
(È *�V(È No4�vù
�¶÷��ò�H©
56�
YZ[n�
�
�Ú �¦§Wd�-�#X
HI�Ú 2-J
Vº
N
[w§N*RSN¦§K(YZ�»n
O´7RYZ��
<�
Ñ
YZ[No2-�
³W��
�Ú J
V�YZ�»n
[w
iÖ�o"Åj[w
\ÖYZ[n:Æ
�Ú j[w�25
:;YZ[��
�Ú i�§
��§¹à&�¢
�¨}¦§#h[[~
24 Samuel P. Huntington, “The West: Unique, Not Universal,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 75, No. 6, pp. 28-46.
25 Gabriel A. Almond, “Clouds, Clocks, and the Study of Politics,” World Politics, Vol. 29, No. 4 (1977).
9
��
ì Ó
0÷YZ[¦ #h[
æH\�gqÒ��YZ[!
"##h[�1990Ê+k
�*Hô
+,-�.YE³�#�0³�
�V��/#y}X×)
�#y}X"
Æ;n®§XH©
(�W
<=åäÊ
YZ[�!¶t��^��YZ2�¬§�=
ôªfI¡^ (Dead, European, White, Male)
[¢
¶ä1¹p�j(8[f
¢YZw1Æ
÷�¢��YZw1ÆD��8[¢YZw1Æ
£�-¢j
(YZw1���j(
�¢
\�-¢�ù¯W�eµ�^>YZw1
¤
f�h¥���YZ
_t
á�)
ñ�1¦�
ß
ãäÊa
HIYZöX#a���
§Ñ� e�Xr�.*
¨E�.jÃ��YZ#���
$%&' (the third world within
the West)
²©¨*S[�h���
"�¼#(�¤l�*�l�
)¬§©¨*S[�h
Á?Ö»ª«f¬#;a�26 æ��jv
Tò®
�K(
á�<Ö�=
ôªfI¡^ (��=
ôË^ !�:;0
�¨E�.*e�Xr�.
YZ2����
YZ
@
��
W�eµ¤f
YZ������
�
(¬Ò
��j((¬Ò56
��*®¯ ej
27°&P
;
��CI(
¬Ò
w1z±²a����o¤
26 Susan J. Carroll and Linda G. Zerilli, “Feminist Challenges to Political Science,” in Ada W. Finifter, ed.,
Political Science: The State of the Discipline II (Washington, D.C.: American Political Science Association,
1993), pp. 55-76; Amy Gutmann, ed., Multiculturalism and “The Politics of Recognition (Princeton:
Princeton University Press, 1992.
27 8��,-FddTgÖ×Y����6,Ç�Ê,1999 ÏS
10
�Ea�Ù(
³�
(�YE�ø0a�d(
´�
(?N
²µa�Ù(
�¶
*P*��.w1a�§!(
6!
(²
³a�!(
vê�}·
()jva�§!(
¸{¹�
Ñk
Ë((¬Ò
1�._88ºs
3�
�~Ì?N
��.
H�Ë(»�G»D�tF
�YZ£÷
£��[h��
�ÕÖ£÷
�ÐÑÆ)k
Ë((¬Ò['�^¼`���*P \>©
�no#Ë(\�Y½Ì~
�����.0Ð
á�¦§
@
¡^*()2
- ~¾s�H¡ÕÖ-aÄ��<=
¿��.*��
w(�.��WT
"
æ�^¢-
o��j(�
ê
�=:
±§��.�8
�j(AÅ
���.�8
��
�*P
��.
�DEÌ÷ ñ` Í>
�ÅÆÎÆ
*�eµ²³
�
µã»j(Ï
���j(a
�
�
l;II�j(
()ê<�À�<
�
£#H=@
4´¦ Ð�t0��(¬Ò�h[[~
Ë(YZ
Ë(YZ[56
·¸�Ë(YZ
Ë(YZ56
·¸�
Ë(���Ë
(��Úù, &3��HIt÷
"ø
»Ë(YZ[n�Ñk· ÷.��
��¬Ò�e@0
Ë(YZ[����YZ
�;çn
>�\�YZ
É
7�»n�����
��h[��ÕÖ
���
ãÑ+k
g8ê
!(*�
ÑÒYZ³Ë([nüÓÔÊ
¼YÑÒY
Z\¹ÕXË(a��Ö
�
���×ÌÍ��
�Ë(�ÒlÂ���O
P
Àùª�2�ò�s�
AÅ
Ë(YZ[
±ò^�õ>
Ø>`#
���Þü (liberal guardianship)
9
W@Ù�· ÷.���
Ù�^
11
�
Ù�Ú�
YZ�»Ð
ÛYZÜd�.ÝÞ�28�H¡
ÏÒê<
��ê<êë Z
ìG¡íî�HI"Â
9ùE
�Üd2�^� (The elites are, for all
practical purposes, the people)�31 v#
Ua#y}8ï2�#ÛÜdY
ZÝÞ�
HYZ[n
0N�APQ#YZ
\�W8GùÑ÷#YZ[56
·¸�ÑkË(YZ56�%¡·¸
²ðñO
Ͻ×*Ͻ`a�ðñ
O#·¸o�ijk
+
VȖ
��()ªÎ
Ë(
ðñÂW2�
:W8`
ðñÂ::�à1¡äòó
j`< ((-sô`<)
ðñÂ<á
�à1ã
%ä�:;8X[^®�&�I
ê<
YZ!�35º+
´�§¢
��â
)*
�
�¼�M (explain the obvious)���12��YZ�X8Â-�8
y¢
12
��YZ�¥-bÑ�
sY�¡8
¢
�
"Ô�56�1�>
>�tý56
>�,U�jÚ56
(middle-range theories)�§
Hf�×ØMkn
VMtý56÷-
ñ� �
0Xtý56
��ttQQ
ÐÑ�1945Ê
�Ë(åÂg�;¡
Ð
��YZ�G
YZÒ
ê_
å®�¡YZÒ�
Ð�¬
��YZ
�G�HI�_�t
(��¼�ÐÑv��y�Ë(ò&Ò�4�ì
�
�
4�ì
Ï^ H¡Û�¢£
n�§®�#
��()
-^x�
^e·¸
H�[RX����
Ë(YE (tñ�($�*¡98�)�b
��-,-h[�Ù56�jþ^I (funny people)36 *�k^I (exotic
33 Ibid, p. 6.
34 F��7,½9��� !G. W. "=!,?#C0J,(¥$Aì%k&,1999)S
35 '7 Donald N. McCloskey, The Rhetoric of Economics (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press,
1985)�
36 William Nelson Fenton, “Integration of Geography and Anthropology in Army Area Study Curricula,”
American Association of University Professors Bulletin, XXXII (1946), p. 706).
13
people)37 ð�z�VW�1957Ê��I�ü^SÞ�Ì�rS
³Ë(<
( !�Ê
Ë((-�<("X#Ù�� kãäXÊf
/�Ù
$
V$
Ë(C8[
tý56jv¯X#a�YE±±�
zM�Ë(
C8/
%-�YE
@ÙúT&'
\((ÐÄ×/%)Mtý56�tý56
·¸
W§0µ¢£���YEzM
*º
´�/%-)M
*º
W·¸°�\�
�/Hô¯j(/HÏ
°�Ë(�ÐÑj
Ï��W�tý
:¨Ë
ª
�Ï\�56
º
��LË(¶÷ÐÑj
Ï��38 ��Ë(YE)M
tý
56*º7RíAúñ(
YZ
:+�ó,Ä8[
¡*ºLM�
-./
YE01õ+2ç
39 c¡�
*º(²3�4�
Operation Camelot) �
<��,-²³
56g;LMË(56YE�7G^
89�40
ì0H
Ô�gj£,�Ö+tý56
^°�Ë(YE
L:
\�gj
£<=åäÊ
tý56��^�ì1
;
�)*
+¤tý56»
»ÐѪ¬
»Ë(
()W�ª¬
H�§�PQW56
·¸*�Ù
V��
��
\�¦§��
�4�pqg.
�
�ÐÑk
HI
�� cI
�&�#;a�ÐÑÆ)k
Ë(�J=#WÏ^
§�Ë(YE�1:t
ý56fð;<=
lb�tý56zM
8 º��Ã�>
Ë(
/%-
>�ð�
³C8[
tý56*º?Ñ�@
` H�î§N�8
�
æ�ån§¨L©
Æ;S##[�'
mt�41 á�H�mt
UVn»[
��¬
!:tý56
`UV»[��¬©�
½�.Úù56�tý56
¡·�1À
Hf¦ E;jÚ»tý
56
¬Ò�á0½�.�Ë(
Ï^
��
56Ë(×)oXA¸BC
�
£WRS���<
±E½�.56
ºD
lÂ�¸zô¦Æ�
Almond * Roselle �1989Ê�&<e¤M½�.56»YZ
¬Ò
-#¡EZ�¿´� (model fitting)
ä1¹p�/ ;ç
ÖäÊ�
ðX�äÊ�ð
½�.56·/NÑ�C>\a
Fut�7E�.´
� (The totalitarian model)
Æ�B§´� (structural functionalism)
YZe�´�
(political culture)
��´� (the development model)
Xr´� (pluralist model)
ê<êë´� (the interest group model)
TÂ�.´� (corporatism)
Y½GH´
� (policy network)
÷øYZ´� (bureaucratic politics)
�Ö¬Ò´� (patron-
37 Harry Eckstein, “A Critique of Area Studies From a West European Perspective,” in Lucian W. Pye, ed.
Political Science and Area Studies: Rivals or Partners (Bloomington: Indiana University Press 1975), p.
203.
38 Immanuel Wallerstein, “The Unintended Conseq